Jump to content

avrahams1

Players
  • Content Сount

    86
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    10209
  • Clan

    [PINZ]

About avrahams1

  • Rank
    Leading Rate
  • Insignia

Recent Profile Visitors

125 profile views
  1. avrahams1

    Are CVs counterable?

    Figures of speech ,are you familiar with those? Are you a bot? When someone uploads a score screen saying "he kicked my [edited]", I assume you call the police to report an assault?
  2. avrahams1

    Are CVs counterable?

    Okay, now I'm sure you're either trolling me or being purposely difficult. I refuse to believe you read me writing "she has no citadel" and thought I literally meant Conqueror has no citadel. I'm done dude, frankly, you're exhausting :(
  3. avrahams1

    Are CVs counterable?

    The citadel is objectively underwater, can only be hit from far away by plunging fire. Also - are you seriously disputing the fact that Conq HE is stupidly strong? As in, pens everything, has insane fire chance? Are you just making a point of defending WG at any cost? Because that's how it looks.
  4. avrahams1

    Are CVs counterable?

    Are you trying to be controversial? The BB that has no citadel and does 16K + 3 fires per salvo isn't OP? Sure dude...
  5. avrahams1

    Are CVs counterable?

    Just had an Akizuki game, CV literally blapped me first minute with 1 dive bombers squad, so much fun. I see your point, CVs are so balanced and add so much value to the game, not like they need to get nuked out of existence or anything :(
  6. avrahams1

    Are CVs counterable?

    Somehow I doubt WG are using only these numbers to judge.
  7. avrahams1

    Are CVs counterable?

    Also that's ignoring so much that isn't reflected in dry damage number tables. What about spotting? What about making the enemies sail out of position and be easy targets for your team? What about making enemy DDs stay away from the caps? There's so much more to the game than what a dry damage numbers table can show.
  8. avrahams1

    Are CVs counterable?

    BBs are made to be shot at, not to take flooding and 3 fires, why do you think the Conqueror is considered stupid OP? It's too easy to get an irreparable flooding on a BB with torp bombers.
  9. avrahams1

    Are CVs counterable?

    So 2 things about this: 1. Not all damage is equal - BBs usually fight other BBs, so the big numbers are to be expected. If most of the damage done by CVs is done to cruisers and DDs (which I assume is the case), that damage is MUCH MORE valuable. 2. Give it another week. The numbers are skewed by the many people who've just tried out the new CVs, that are not CV mains. In another week the numbers will reflect more the damage by people who continue to play CVs.
  10. avrahams1

    New CVs

    They asked about CVs, I said what I think about CVs.
  11. avrahams1

    New CVs

    It's not. CVs were broken OP and are still broken OP. Basically IMO CVs haven't changed mostly, except that there's no counter-play between the CVs now - meaning a CV can't really counter the enemy CV cuz he doesn't have fighters.
  12. avrahams1

    Are CVs counterable?

    How can a CV help against the enemy CV in the new system? In the old system he had fighters to vector, with the new stupid fighter consumable it's infinitely less probable a CV will use it to provide air cover.
  13. avrahams1

    Are CVs counterable?

    I like how you keep moving the goalposts. So now a CV killing an AA spec'd BB escorted by 2 super-AA cruisers is acceptable, as long as he didn't do anything else? Notice, that's an assumption on your part - 2 minutes after he killed the BB the CV was free to keep his killing spree. Let's take an equivalent of that - a DD killing a Missouri escorted by Des Moines and Woorster, assume all players involved are competent - does that make sense? 99/100 times I'd expect that DD to be dead in 1 minute max.
  14. avrahams1

    New CVs

    Same as Arty in WoT - a class that can stay in the back away from any risk of damage and still do damage is automatically OP. CVs are the only class that doesn't need to stick it's head out to do damage, worst that'll happen is that you lose a squad and have to wait a few minutes till you can use that kind again (and use the other planes in the meantime).
  15. avrahams1

    A simple fix for Aircrafr carriers-Everyone happy

    I'm far from being a CV player, I hate CVs as much as the next guy. HOWEVER - I think your solution is as bad as the arguments given by CV advocates. Your argument is basically "nerf the class and count on teamwork to make it work", but that's exactly what CV advocates say (not that I fully agree) - "BBs and DDs should be covered by allied AA cruisers, allied CV should cover the air, stick together, use teamwork". Your argument is (in my opinion) as flawed as theirs - you can't assume teamwork in random battles, you can't even assume competency.
×