Jump to content

mariouus

Players
  • Content Сount

    886
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    8938

About mariouus

  • Rank
    Officer Cadet
  • Insignia

Recent Profile Visitors

1,461 profile views
  1. mariouus

    CV Rework Discussion

    They can't, because this would be against their goal, what they are trying do achive in the first place. CV is a Damage Farming class, it does not have any other propeties. The changes in patch is targeted do make non-CV players less frustrated when farmed. Because of that, they can not really buff anything that is connected do CV damage farming ability. And there is nothing else left. Non-CV classes have more than 20 separate propeties do nerf or buff. CV has very few, you listed almost all of them. All the other possible propeties are allready very good (so buffing would not change anything), or mostly irrelavent (buffing would change something extremly rarely).
  2. mariouus

    CV Rework Discussion

    There is almost nothing, that can be buffed on a CV. Concept is too shallow.
  3. mariouus

    CV Rework Discussion

    You are right, they never sayed that it was because CV rework. But the timing and the fact that New CV was excellent (easy mode) for producing perma-flooding (played only 6.battles in Ranger, but achived 2. Liquidator acivements) . Kind of makes me suspicious. It was not really a problem for years, but suddenly it was big enought problem do change.
  4. mariouus

    CV Rework Discussion

    Wasn't the flooding nerf by-product of CV rework?
  5. mariouus

    Are the servers down again?!?!

    Constant server issues... if I where a paying customer I would be pissed... Luckily WG cured my habit of being a paying customer many months ago... So... Oh dear, How sad, Nevermind...
  6. mariouus

    CV Rework Discussion

    94% of your T10 matches had CV in it. (8.battles in Tier.X non-CV vs 158.battles in Tier.X CV (past 21.days)). If we consider all ALL ships that can meet tier.X, it is somewhat less. (according do WG, tier.8 seeing tier.X average of 40% of battles). 69% of all your TIER.X battles had a CV, if all your battles in non-CV class did not have a CV. Realistically, even with very optimistic expectations that only 33% of battles in non-CV had a CV - 79%. So,no, not 60%, but whopping 79%-94% of tier.X eligeble battlese you have played had a CV.
  7. mariouus

    CV Rework Discussion

    Never sayed that you are a CV main, I sayed that since the rework, you are not a DD main. Your most played singe ship-class is CV since the rework. Calling other player a fraud is non-construtive. He plays CV for his reasons. You play CV for your reasons. No difference there. Only difference is, that he is not making up insulting names.
  8. So the Yaska guy is still present...and has gotten even dumber...Interesting, did not think it was possible, but now I know.
  9. mariouus

    CV Rework Discussion

    We do not have do imagine of somebody presenting themself as a surface ship player. Whe have them from day one. Infact, one of them is claiming something about certain nation surface ship right in the very page (202). Other one, as I recall, made a topic about "how weak the CV, when compared do others", screenshot he used do display this weaknes, showd that his "weak" CV performed mutch better than he ever had in a non-CV. Actually. Considering that since february, you have played 45% of your battles in a CV. You have not been particullary truthful here either? DD main? Really? Not since the CV rework. Maybe not calling somebody a Trojan Horse (fraud essentially), because then you are one aswell.
  10. mariouus

    WG we have a problem.

    Generally speaking, no WE do not have problem. Since early days in WOT, I have Made a screenshot of every raging directed at me, in both in-game and Port Chat. And I have only 10.screenshots about that (four where raging about kill-stealing, two where usual general purpose A-holes and four actually had a point - my performance could have been summed-up in couple of rude words). So no, WoWs playerbase in not toxic, nor mean. It is actually quite Nice. I get raged upon once in every 600-700 battles. It is nothing.
  11. mariouus

    CV Rework Discussion

    Honestly? Having a CV once, for every every three- four battles with-out one. CV in game, just like it did in the real life, makes strenghts of non-CV classes mostly un-needed. Why you would need a DD or CA/CL spotting, when you have planes to do that. Why would you need BB tanking and dealing damage, when you could deal damage, with-out the need of tanking. So basically, other classes serve as AA mounts, or fodder do keep enemy CVs planes off your CV. We do have it in game aswell, in large blobs. All non-CV classes have do play by not using their strengths. In reality it was aswell. BBs, DDs and CA/CL where most used as a AA screen do keep enemy CV occupied. And not in their intended role. So real world Strategy sayes that this is how it should be. Problem here is, that Game is not a real life. People do not play it do Win a war, they play it do have fun. This can not happen, if you can not use the strenghts of your ship. And are always forced do play in Uniform, mundane way. Not do mention that AA escort duties are not fun. In a game, you can not have a class, that constantly forces other players play on their class weaknesses. And not only, even if you do so you are still attacked, alot, with-out no counterplay. So CV in current form. 1.Kills tactical variety of the game, forcing players do huddle up in blobs. 2.Takes away individual strenghts of non-CV classes. 3. Is really frustraiting for non-CV classes. Because nobody likes do be attacked, with-out any counter options. 4. Forcing non-CV players do play in probably the worste and most un-fun role. Actually the biggest mistake WG did, with the rework, was assuming that CV (or multible CV) can work in every battle. And then magnifying the frustrating parts for non-CV players even further. Some problems that "new" CV has, where present in the old, but their low numbers made them tolerable.
  12. mariouus

    Is this how CVs are intended to be "balanced"?

    It is, but this screenshot does not present how many aircrafts can AAA shoot down. It presents certain CV players ability do get their plains shot down.
  13. mariouus

    Is this how CVs are intended to be "balanced"?

    You do undestand meaning of a Passive skill? Passive skill is a skill, that is always active, but not controlled by player. Not passive in a sense that it does not fire. If one circles inside AA DPS zone long enough, his plains is shot down. It is as easy as that. And in this case it was the case.Like I sayed many-many post ago. Main thing, before trying do use any statistical value, is do understand where they come from. Actually my CV stats come from RTS Langley I tryed when I started playing. As far has new CVs are conserned, I am no worse than you are.
  14. mariouus

    Is this how CVs are intended to be "balanced"?

    Nope, this what AAA look like when you are blessed with having bad CVs in the opposing team. Enemy CVs have average PR between them of a whopping 300 and average WR of 31,255%. Even Minekaze would have excellent AAA when attacked by those players.
  15. mariouus

    Is this how CVs are intended to be "balanced"?

    I do not know what you think you posted. But I see that It list at 2019/02/23, so before E was actually relaised. It shows 21 players and 1261.battles There was 10.times as many last weeks alone. So it is not two months.
×