x00Starki

You gotta look just cute and innocent, then they leave you alone...

There will be none!

So do I.

From OBT on it would be quite nonsense to keep it.

As in real life, spotting, shooting and to see where and what you are shooting are all different things... 40km+ range were also hard to handle in real life. To my mind, no balancing would be needed at all, because even if I take the in-air-time at 20km ingame - without saying too much in this OPEN! forum - it gives you enough time to evade at least a few shot of each salvo with a slight change of your course.

There are fast and faster cruisers...and there is St.Louis-class...

It is simply not possible in todays academic world to check every footnote / link / reference. Especially if the essay / thesis includes English scientific literature... If you are unlucky, you didn't even get the book in time to check it - let alone the effort neccessary. Sorry for OT. If there were further WE-test neccessary, we would already have had a third one - and more alpha-invitations.

+1 I can tell you, half of all historians operate this way...

read the edit from Riches.

We are refering to his video and he refers to the forum...nice circle. Anyway, for he is an alpha-/supertester, perhaps his sources are better than ours...

Would explain the maintanances on website this and last week, as a Dev said in an interview that he is preparing website for the oncoming testing phases.

That's the one I didn't get, but perhaps you can't tell us more... ty, +1 Please don't tell me that I missed the start of CBT... ;)

If they don't hurry, I become a family man too before CBT starts... and I'm not exaggerating - I'm damn serious...

What the ... is PAX?

This is something I just cannot believe - not even in my worst dreams... CBT will start before may begins (worst case). No, I have no source, just my opinion and my impression from last beta-WE.

He is talking about beta-WE in general --> maybe also open-beta-weekends...

...and, it didn't even look cool...

Especially that one critical hit can take out five barrels. See Prince of Wales.

How do you want to implement a manual mode for different types of guns firing all together? different calibre, range, firing angles, RoF, fuses (contact, time, proximity...)... that just won't work.

Nobody shoots ally to score - in all other WG-games you even lower your score by killing teammates. Why should it be different in WoWS? And, afaik it isn't / wasn't different last beta-WE.

NDA as I understoud it forbids us to give away information about content of the game that is more specific than that the DEVs give away to public. I don't exactly know if general public is aware of the PvE-content of WoWS. In my mind this issue (only the PvE-part) would only have been ok in alpha- or beta-forum. Didn't want to harass you - in case I did --> sorry!

Total agree to you both. In one of my earlier battle at last beta-WE I even sank an ally with my torps accidently. Guns aren't a problem due to their trajectory.

Of course. Anything else would make the game a deathmatch.

It has! It isn't. Controls are absolutely intuitive.

NDA or wrong forum - but true.