Spellfire40

The problem with 3 DDs is you cant play together since usally you have to go for diferent caps anyway

Sims+ Atlanta?

agist 6 hydros? and 6 radars that rivals your torp range too?

true efectiv gameplay isnt that fun but in randoms you usally gets enogh players doing it anyway. Sometimes its stupid and lead to totally unbalanced games sometimes it throws of efectiv gameplay off so much that it actually creates fun and interesting ones. That unpedicaility is whats for me as a solo clanless player makes WoWS enjoyable. But then again i can analyze and see problems related to CW gameplay becasue once again its a no brainer and anyone with a half decent understanding can see the problems just not WG. Then again might be a ploy to fish for some gold.....just dont flood my reserves with rent a ship captains like tehy did on rampage mode in WoT i think if i install again i still have like 3-4 IS 7 crews without ever having it unlooked.....

Its basical 1000 gold plus module demont cost times 2 if they dont fit the gameplay of the setup.Well i gues they could reaching a midway point giving a gold reward to conter that could solve that too, thogh thats only part of the problems Fara pointed out a few more. they might have to fiddle with other consumables too to give the remaining classes even a decent level of normal gameplay and the rent a ship selection is a joke if they dont change anything else sice the ships you can select are the worst choise posible under the rules creating basically a farm clan for thouse that have the right ships that can compeate. Nobody likes to be farmed if no significant rewards come in early or mid only the big ones will even brother with it like they allready do in the open tornaments. If thats hapens its a failure too. Well you can counter that to a bit by creating divisions so only the big boys compeate for the big prices and anyone else can have fun battles for more modest ones.Just dont give out real big names because you will anger the larger comunity.......after all only a small part of players are in clans and even a smaler are interested in competitiv play....since up to now competitiv play has 0 to do with naval combat and at least for me thats a total turnoff that kills immersion.

why? 6 BBs called Moskwa and one Mega Za...ehm i mean Conqurer as a cruiser.... Honestly if you create a alternate reality with that enforced team composition how about removing radar too? Far to few real choices otherwise . Also how about creating clone of all your T10 ships and captain with reseted skills and phantom modules so you dont force them to pay gold to get reset to match that alternate reality setup and dont handicap players that dont have specal modules? There are so many things that dont really match up and handicap you if you try to play this.

You have a real hard time traing a Italian BB captain in Iron Duke.....

Then look the stream on twitch? I dont like Flamu too much but that dont mean he dont is a very good player that can make sound judgements what is good and what is crap. Not that another cruiser like stealth and pinpoint acuracy ship needs a Flamu to aknowlege that the 1st build was way too OP. Do i find that larger dispersion AND crap sigmal is the way to go? Hell no! Do I think the old build was bad for the game hell yes we dont need another cruiser deleting ship, There are way too many allready.

But If CCs gets their hand on it it means they are past ST dosnt it? Anybody think that CL is really fit for T6? Do we really need another crazy Krym that only apeal to colectors (and even as someone who bought every ship to date i wouldnt buy this fantasy design that is totally unknown if it isnt play fun....) I just hope in both cases you actuall hear what CCs have to say about this ships. You certainly messed up more than once.....

Well anyway the rent a ship option is a joke. Its just there to get some victims for clans that have the T10 ships needed to really compeate anyway to roflstomp Not that it matters to me since i have enogh T10 ships if i were interested wich im not. What do interests me are changes like the smokenerf that seriously looks like they are aimed at competiv play but have a negativ impact on random gameplay.

If they wanted to make it accessible why they give rent a shima and Groser Kurfürst instead of a Gering/Z52 and a Conqueror. ?

Well mikasa is a good ship too......if anybody is stupid enogh to let it with its snail seed actually get into secondary range. GZ armor dont matter agist anthing that seriously shoots at it. Its as useless as kagas 203mm guns a gimic nothing else to get a laugh out of 1 in 100 games. I detonated a kagaro once too with a secondary shell of my cleveland . GZ hull has decent speed but thats it. Its to visible for a T8 CV its AA is totally crap thats it about the ship itself. If its fires its secondarys its dead anyway in 99.9 % of all cases. About the airgroup ... Well GZ tester got both test versions removed and we got a pretty detailed point by point questionary what we thoght about her. Even if you got lucky and the enemy CV allows it to oneshot a BB or 2 its a unfun ship that has very little carry potential and more often than not due to mirrior MM puts your own team at a huge disadvantage due to being to specialized.

wasnt it 6km? not that it mater if it were 0.1 km for a khaba

and make them all 46 kn khaba like?

Pan asia DD line T 10 5.5 km detection range AND mod 7kmish radar?

Dont worry there will be a T5 0 fighter low speed DB only CV inc. The same developer that thogh GZ was fun, UK BB He shells are balanced and is now pushing for Pan Asia DDs with radar when T10 allready has Kagaro like conceilent said its ok and balaced....what do the players that actaully see the game not only in a 3d model viewer kow about the game?

They dig their grave when they made it 7 vs 7 and T10. That a T10 CV is a major force in a game with that little ships is a no brainer. Even if CV were balanced and fun to play (wich they are not).....either way id rather have that format than balacing CVs for it and screwing them over in random as a result. Because all said and done CW is a tiny percentage of what players do. And organized Tornaments can still be whatever they want. Im just wondering whey they disabled teambattles and then put out such a crap......

A air droped 7 km low detectable torp would be an intersting Idia to implement .....

Im saying anything that is designed to hurt BBs WILL devestate crusers. Thats the reson IJN lost their 0/3/3 setups on Tir 7/8 was not because it killed BBs but devestated anything but BBs automatical.... Since most cruisers are a legit Target for deepwater Torps........

No this one will outright kill cruisers too or at least heavily wreck them. while BBs pobably survive them easier than AP bombs...

mal ne einfache frage...Welches schiff skillt den bis jetzt def fire und manual AA. Ich meien selbst in meier Iowa hab ich nur aft und flackrange modul. in meiner FdG nur aft. Insovern sollten Flugangriffe einen in einen BB doch wehtun oder? Persooelich wurde ich sogar AFT spliten in 2 skills einer fuer flack einer fuer secondarys.

Yama has a actuall citadel that can be hit most other T10 dont. Better? Well GK is big and clumsy as a drawback. Monty ... well has no real drawack. Conqu has low hit points but the superheal to make sure it dont matter ...

47 damage sieg: 375k 109 k niederlage 605 k 68k niederlage 428k 26k niederlage 345k 82k niederlage 450k jeweils mot 20% flag (edit) und der 50% flagund der standard camo von ihr. Spass machen tut sie aber nicht kaum cits gegen BBs nund frst pens ohne ende.

Können besagte Schiffe aber auch nur einen Typ schiff angreifen sinvoll?