Jean_Bart

The carriers are meant to promote offensive gameplay, not camping (just as in real life)! Noobs are obviously not happy with camping behind an island and being torped and bombed to death from above! Sitting ducks are an easy target! This is what happens with all ships that are camping, instead of attacking! That is why carriers are considered "unbalanced" - because they are meant to curtail camping! The best tactics against an enemy carrier is to attack it as fast as possible, not to run or hide (because you cannot)! WG has suffeed mismanagement since the start and it is surprising how they bring their own games to demise so systematically by repeling the playerbase! It has happened with ALL 3 "Worlds of...", I guess now it is just WoWs' turn! WORKINGASINTENDED! This is meant to accelerate people's discontent with the carriers so they could remove them altogether without much noise... ...oh wait - they have just started! Arty in WoT was there for the same reason as carriers in WoWs - to reduce camping, to make the gameplay more aggressive and the matches - more dynamic! Noobs can never win such games, because they require brain, instead to camp behind some cover, staring at single pixel on the screen with finger on the trigger - that is the most noobs are capable of! But noobs are ready to pay real money to win and for WG they are their most important customers and will do ANYTHING to make them stay in the game and spend more money! At this point that includes wrecking the carriers! I quit WOT, then i quit WoWp - history repeats itself more often than not, i guess it is time to quit WoWs now!

Your analysys is quite narrow, covers a single particular situation and the only one when the few of Musashi's assets can have an edge against other ships! When i play battleships i am not afraid of other battleships, but only destroyers! Musashi is an easy target for any DD, even if it is 2 tiers lower, while Mighty Mo is much more versatile! Musashi is slow and sluggish - a damage/XP pinata! It cannot escape once it gets in trouble! It has weak AA and is easy prey for carriers too! Mighty mo is faster, more nimble, has superiour AA defences and can fight destroyers much more effectively, just as any other ship type in the game! Musashi is in huge disadvantage against carriers too, not only because of sligghishness and weak AA, but also because she is unable to catch any carrier she would encounter! So, to sum it up, Musashi has an edge against other BBs, while being in hopeless disadvantage against DDs and carriers! Mighty Mo fares well against any type and tier of ship she will encounter!

It is! At least compared with the Mighty Mo - otherwise they would not remove it! Musashi may have more armour, health and bigger guns but it is also more clumsy, slower and cumbersome compared with Mighty Mo! This means, Musashi is much less versatile and can get in troublesome situations much more often than Missourri! Didi i mention anything about the Mighty Mo's radar ?! The thing is many people already have large amounts of free XP (thereby not spending cash to get it), so they make it worthless - people simply don't have anything good to spend it on! Then WG introduce new currency (coal), hence there are few players who have it in large amounts, in order to make them spend CASH for it ! Large amounts of accumulated game currency will be made worthless in order to force people to spend CASH to get the new currencies! It is just a variety of... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beryozka

WG said multiple times that they will introduce Jean Bart for free XP, but they delay its release because they are still testing it! Yet again they broke their promise! The difference is that Musashi is a junk, while Mighty Mo and JB are not! That's why Mighty Mo was removed from the tech tree! If you say so, i am within that 1% of people you are talking about! I collected ALL my free XP from battles and i am NOT going to spend such insane amounts of money for Jean Bart! I was waiting for this ship since i first registered my account (for obvious reasons), but now i WILL NOT spend money to get Jean Bart! More people than you can imagine have obtained enough free XP to claim a reward in the shape of exquisite and exceptional ship, but with the Mighty Mo removal, and WG offering JB for cash, i really don't see anything attractive to spend my free XP on ! What are my options?! - Crippled Downgraded Yamato (aka Musashi), Tier 7 british BB (tier 7 is already preoccupied with 3 british premium BBs - Nelson, Duke of York and Hood) and a fictional soviet battlecruiser?! 750 k is 90 EUR for newbies and noobs, for people like me it is free and a lot of time spent to play! Because Musashi is a junk and Missouri and Jean Bart are NOT! That is called pay-to-win! You can get the best ships only if you pay cash for them ! Let me consolate you with one song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOgFZfRVaww Imagine WG keeps their promises Imagine Jean Bart is for free XP Imagine that Mighty Mo is not so IMBA and is still in the tech tree...

If you don't have tallent - don't play!

Carriers are dead! From 1941 onward they were the most important capital ships, but in this game they have become useless from strategic and tactical standpoint! The most important asset and ablity for a carrier, was that it could perform its tasks while moving, evading attacks and running away from the enemy! Carriers are always on the move while attacking, now they are nothing more than stationary floating platforms with limited usefulness in the game. Dear friends and players - you know that Wargaming is right, even when its wrong! They will never revert the carrier gameplay, because everything is "workingasintended"! Always have, always will!

I wonder why SMS Nassau was so heavily nerfed (decreased rate of fire and repair-party charges reduced from 3 to just 2). Now it is the worst tier III battleship - worse even than Kawachi! Nassau has the smallest gun calibre among tier III BBs so the higher ROF was obviously justified and historical. Nassau also has the second shortest gun range among tier III BBs, while lacking the HE and concealment of Kawachi! On top of that, the number of repair-party charges was outrageously reduced, making Nassau considerably less resilent than all other BBs in game.

SMS Nassau was heavily nerfed. Now it is the worst tier III battleship, even worse than Kawachi!

Your post is full of lame excuses and the lack of justification is not convincing (too many "likely", "hopefully", "probably" and other ambigous guesstimation narration)! BC tree?! When? After 2-3 more years ?! What about slow-fast BB split? 5-6 more years?! Yet this would lead to many more fantasy ships to fill up these branches from tier 1-3 to 10. My main point (which you missed) was that the british BB tree has too many fantasy ships, while many real, historic ships were omitted!

You mad bro? About the RN battleships - at last! I am happy with the introduction of these ships, but my happiness is severely mixed with disappointment, because... 1. No HMS Dreadnought. (I guess WG intend to make it premium, to squeeze money out of that ship's fame). 2. The introduction of "super dreadnought" (Orion class) too soon at tier 4 doesn't seem right to me. It could lead to imbalance due to the combination of high caliber and the high number of barrels. 3. No Revenge class. (It could be an alternative tier 6 ship along with Queen Elizabeth. Ommiting 5 RN BBs that participated in both world wars is certain letdown and disappointment. Although similar, QElizabeths were faster, R-class were smaller and could have better concealment in-game.) 4. No Renown/Repulse. [These ships were quite unusual and could add diversity to the game and playstile in the british BB line, instead to fill tiers with very similar (Orion, Iron Duke) or fantasy ships at higher tiers. It is bad surprise to see so many fantasy ships in the RN BB line.] 5. No Glorious/Corageous/Furious. (Same as for Renown/Repulse. Even more - Furious could have module upgrade to its historic main battery of two 457 mm guns, which could certainly add flavour and diversity to the game.) 6. No Nelson class in the researchable tech tree (so far). (Nelson-class could be easily tier 7 or 8 british BB. Why fill the tree with fantasy ships and ommit historic ships or introduce them only as premiums/special to squeeze money?! Very silly!) 7. No HMS Vanguard. (The last RN battleship could be easily tier 7, 8 or even 9, but i guess WG has written it off the tech tree in order to squeeze money out of it as premium or promo ship.) Just my ...

The question is simple: How to leave a clan?

No, there is no such thing!

You need a brain to begin with ! No, it doesn't! Even if it did, it is pretty useless! Do you really need a skill in order to find out you are being shot at ?!

:My 2 cents and remarks are in blue!

Not always, since your own smokescreen doesn't always help your teammates, but the ennemies, depending on the situation.

I used signals and camouflages generously, in order to complete the missions faster and i did and got the Graf Spee on time. You should have done the same and you would have been even more successful and faster than i, assuming your WR%.

The new update is terrible - the last nail in the WoWs' coffin! Period! WoWs is going down the drain as happened with WoT and especially WoWp! I am seriously considering to uninstall WoWs as i did earlier with the other two games! Wargaming never listen to feedback - it is useless! They have never reverted or admitted their own mistakes! Will this time be any different?! I don't think so! "Oh my God, these muppets (players) think that somebody gives a damn about their feedback !"

It is the Kriegsmarine/Kaiserlishe Marine, so it has to be bad in game by default , accoring to WG! After a few more updates, it will turn out that the Soviet Navy, comprising of 3 obsolete battleships, handful of cruisers and few dozens of destroyers was the strongest navy in the world! The Royal Navy doesn't even exist in WoWS !

MrConway, on 24 February 2016 - 01:32 PM, said: I can also not assure you that any changes will be made, we can however assure you that we are collecting this feedback and presenting it to the devs emphatically! "Oh my God, these muppets (players) think that somebody gives a damn about their feedback !"

The game is too retarded to continue playing it anymore!

Guys guys guys... all behind this update is to make destroyers and russian ships in particular, more powerfull than existing capital ships, just to boost the appearance of the Soviet Navy which was a midget, compared with a number of other navies in the world in the first half of 20-th century ! At the start of the WW1, these were the strongest navies in the world: At the start of WW2, these were the strongest navies in the world: The update is meant to make soviet DDs and premium cruisers appear to have parity with capital ships and hide the impotence of the Sovier/Russian navies in he face of stronger advrsaries from reality! This game lacks the formidable Royal Navy (except a single premium ship) and notable navies like Regia Marina or Marine Nationale, but has a whole line of DDs and some imbalanced premium cruisers of the Soviet Navy, yet updates are made to boost the performance of these little red boats ! Yet again, this game confirms that it has nothing to do with reality, historical accuracy or basic logic or common sense !

This game is totally unplayable - both from technical and gameplay standpoints!

Why are you commenting posts that you have deleted and other people cannot see them ?! Do you think that i care anymore ?! No, thanks, i have uninstalled all 3 games and i will never again come back to play them !