Takeda92
-
Content Сount
3,802 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
8478 -
Clan
[PRAVD]
Everything posted by Takeda92
-
Akizuki - suggestion for a high tier IJN premium Destroyer
Takeda92 replied to Elenortirion's topic in Destroyers
that's in real life.. but in WoWS on the other hand! -
Akizuki - suggestion for a high tier IJN premium Destroyer
Takeda92 replied to Elenortirion's topic in Destroyers
I like to have my Akizuki to have 90 degrees, fire the guns and see the shell fall on myself -
yeah but the forums went crazy. There were like 4-5 threads about how WG ruined IJN DDs today in both NA and EU
-
Anyone realized that the torp removal changes were removed from the original notes? http://forum.worldof...s-and-downtime/
-
Akizuki - suggestion for a high tier IJN premium Destroyer
Takeda92 replied to Elenortirion's topic in Destroyers
Speaking of Akizuki, is there any documents on the effectiveness of the 10cm guns at AA? are there any documented planes shot down by any 10cm gun? -
19k games for Fletcher against 22k games for Kagero in the last week is hardly USN numbers are low.
-
Tell me, since when NA released patchnotes before anyone else and no other server released anything yet? Devs on Q&A said there was a big nerf planned but they decided not to do it. They also said they wanted to do a captain reset but also decided not to do it. Guess what the patchnotes said... Please wait for more reliable notes before judging?
-
There's a big chance that these notes are outdated. NA patch almost never release notes first and no other server have released any patchnotes so far. I think the removal of these torpedoes is what the devs had in mind for this patch and decided not to do it in the end. I'd wait for more reliable patchnotes, no offence to NikoPower.
-
With the commander compensation, I think there won't be any need. Saying that, now I'm actually worried. The devs said that they were planning another severe nerf but they decided not to do it, along with refunding the captain skills. What if this was the changed they had in mind and by mistake they forgot to remove it from the patch notes? I can imagine the rage of people expecting a captain reset only for them not to get it.
-
I think it was because most people stopped using them anyway. If very few who couldn't handle the shorter torps and still used the long ones finally leave the Shimakaze and Kagero, her numbers will go down and WG can probably re-buff them to be effective again. It seems that Kegero was played 22k times and Fletcher only 19k times. Considering Fletcher has faster reload and 2 more torps, I wonder who is contribute to the torpedo soup more.
-
The new patchnotes from NA mentions that the long range torpedoes on Fubuki, Kagero and Shimakaze are being completely removed. They also mentioned that captains on the ships who got changed (I don't know if this also includes the ships that got their AA changed) will get a free captain reset. http://forum.worldofwarships.com/index.php?/topic/80610-056-patchnotes-and-downtime/
-
PRAVDA Kai - Open Now! [KancollexGuP Community]
Takeda92 replied to Xandier59's topic in Clan Recruitment
Technically wows doesn't have clans yet. We are more like recruiting for the community of Pravda which eventually, the WoWS clan will be part of. -
They did say the aimbotters are very rare, so it's not like you're suddenly safe from fire and doesn't need to use your WASD.
-
Akizuki - suggestion for a high tier IJN premium Destroyer
Takeda92 replied to Elenortirion's topic in Destroyers
Well since the test server is running it can be a good chance to test a sec build Zao there. Too bad I haven't downloaded the test server. -
Akizuki - suggestion for a high tier IJN premium Destroyer
Takeda92 replied to Elenortirion's topic in Destroyers
It would be cool if someone spec a full secondaries Zao and test the 10cm guns in a training room. -
I started a similar thread on the NA forum after a discussion I had there and I thought I share it here as well.
-
I bet it will be the first branch to be released in 2017, unless they don't make the promised 4 branches for 2016.
-
Because Anshan is a tier 6 DD?
-
Good. Now compare it to tier 6 DDs....
-
No, the devs actually state that detection ranges are based on the ship height, with some balance exception!
-
Uh... detection ranges depends on how tall the ship is, not how long. Montana is longer than Yamato yet it is still more stealthy because it is shorter.
-
Akizuki - suggestion for a high tier IJN premium Destroyer
Takeda92 replied to Elenortirion's topic in Destroyers
I used to think that if HE penetrated, it does an increased damage (up to its full damage if it hit the citadel) and if it didn't penetrate it does reduced damage, sort of like AP but with less penetration and no bouncing. -
I don't get it when people say remove on launcher from Shimakaze or add another launcher to Kagero. How about we remove the 460mm guns from Yamato and replace them with 410mm to fix the overmatch mechanic, does that sound alright? She initally had 3x3 but they were removed because they caused stability issues. All Hatsuharu class DDs ended up with 2x3 by the time they got sunk. There's a reason why the newer destroyer classes used 2x4 launchers after the Hatsuharu.
-
I guess so. I mean after all, it's us who got the information here, not our EU office who probably never heard of such thing
-
There was no such thing as 3x4 torps Kagero. Kagero was the most widely used IJN DD in the war, not some fantasy design. Instead, they can giver her much faster reload like 75 seconds. They can give her the torpedo reload consumable as a third slot, they can lower her torp detection, anything within the capabilities of the ship and within balance reasons.
