Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Takeda92

Weekend Tester
  • Content Сount

    3,802
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    8478
  • Clan

    [PRAVD]

Everything posted by Takeda92

  1. Provided the RU cruisers get their well-deserved nerf too, I don't mind. Anyone who calls IJN cruisers "flamethrowers" instead of RU cruisers doesn't know better. Also, Sub_Octavian said himself they are not trying (they are trying) to turn the game into World of Battleships so who cares about little ships? Battle-Brainlessships is all you need. In seriousness though, Zao does need a slight nerf (unlike Shimakaze whom they screwed up with). Personally, I'd change her shells to the ones the previous cruisers use, this way She could keep the muzzle velocity but the damage numbers will go down. This is WG we are talking about so I'm a bitt worried they will screw this up like the always do.
  2. That ship could use a nerf, provided Montana won't get buffed ever again.
  3. Babies just don't know when to stop don't they.
  4. Takeda92

    aim modification 0

    Do you want an I win button for paying money for the game too?
  5. Takeda92

    There's no way Tirpitz has 56 AA rating.

    It has been buffed for like 17 times, so why not. Buff it. Everyone likes buffs for premium ships regardless if they need them or not.
  6. Takeda92

    Is Flint really that OP?

    What makes you think Sharnwhatever was made bad? it could still be a very good ship as far as care (I don't really). And none of these 3 ships are being sold so WG can just gift them. They don't want to take Sharwhatev from the store.
  7. Takeda92

    Is Flint really that OP?

    It's a premium ship. It is defended by the devs by default. You don't players to defend them. I mean, you actually think the devs don't know how strong/OP (take your pick) this ship is? They are the ones who balanced it after Atlanta, they know what were they doing.
  8. Takeda92

    Is Flint really that OP?

    It works both ways. Why are the same people who haven't seen Flint defend it and say it is not OP? What's with the playerbase and defending premiums mentality?
  9. Takeda92

    Mogami's no. 5 turret angles

    Speaking of that, two salvos of a Budyonny set my Haguro on 3 fires, and the next 2 set me on another two.
  10. Takeda92

    Mogami's no. 5 turret angles

    No, but I remember that's what the test server notes said.
  11. Takeda92

    Mogami's no. 5 turret angles

    Somehow I doubt. The devs have this nasty habit (same for WoT) of shoving the balance of regular ships way down the priority list. Sometimes, they even don't bother fixing stuff if nobody really complain about. Visual models are also part of such thing. Just look how long it took them to lower Nurnberg in the water line. Even then, they only did it for the new hull.
  12. Takeda92

    Mogami's no. 5 turret angles

    And nerf Ibuki's angle to the same one as Mogami... No wait, I have batter idea: make it worse!
  13. Takeda92

    Premium ships nerf. Acceptable?

    Yes, I did. Not impressed. You know why? Look at the back turret. All this room for the turret to turn, yet it doesn't. Meanwhile, 2 patches ago they buffed the turret angles on Tirpitz to make it "easier" to play for some reason. and This patch it gets citadel buffs as well because why not. They try to find out all the small things to make premiums desirable and pleasant to play, but if it's a regular ship then to hell with it, who cares, the ship is "doing fine statistically." It shouldn't be buffed. Tirpitz is also doing fine, but let's buff it regardless for funsies. And for reference, here's Myoko, so I doubt that Mogami couldn't turn it like that too:
  14. Takeda92

    Premium ships nerf. Acceptable?

    Tirpitz. That stupid ship keeps getting buffed patch after patch after patch. Right now, it is the easiest ship to play in the game (at high tiers). Meanwhile, heavens forbid if they gave Mogami a slightly better turret traverse.
  15. Takeda92

    IJN gunboats

    AFT doesn't always work though. In most games you're gonna meet DDs and you're going to be shooting at said DDs, and you will be spotted and shot at. You need any extra health you can get and I was saved many times by having that extra health. If I have a Kagero, I might consider having the range upgrade module instead of AFT for example, but who wants a Kagero!
  16. Takeda92

    Kantai Collection kai2

    I have been away from the game for a long time. But I hope it's an Italian ship and not German. At least in Kancolle, the Italians are getting some love XD
  17. Takeda92

    Trap map and the lemming train

    Ever since the change to this map, it just doesn't feel right to me anymore. I don't know if anyone share the same feeling about this map as I do. Each game I played in this map, it's always the same. Lemming train to C point, or at least you hope so otherwise the match is lost. B point is when some DDs and sometimes cruiser go. It's where the winners of C points go usually around midgame. A point is what you always hear about in chat: "Take B and C, forget about A." Almost no major fighting take place at A and usually I found that at most, only 2 ships go there to secure the cap. If you do that and no one faces you there then you risk finish the match without doing any significant damage in that match. Keep in mind that the area around A is a huge part of the map. The entire H, I, J and 1,2 and 3 lines are usually deserted. I've never seen a map that encourages such lemming before. Even New Dawn doesn't always end up with a Lemming to C point, and I heard a lot of people complain about that map. To me, Trap seems like a really bad map and I rarely see a diverse gameplay in it. If most of your team doesn't rush C and take it, then the game is almost always lost. Is Trap really a bad map? Should it be changed or reworked? What are people's opinions on it? Map discussion on the forums in very rare in World of Warships. I remember in WoT it happens all the time. No offense intended for Admiral Ackbar in this thread.
  18. Takeda92

    Changes to Update 0.5.9 after Public Test

    The same people who are angry in this thread and said they will leave are the same people who will throw their money at Sharnhorst and whatever premium WG release. The playerbase, unfortunately, is as pathetic as WG if not worse, and yes I am part of this playerbase. We all are still gonna play this game and pay for premiums and you know it. So please don't act angry at WG and speak empty words when you're not going to do anything.
  19. Takeda92

    German BBs line at PT - Youtube link by Baron

    Notser's video shows them in color
  20. That's... not how the skill works! SA just tells you you are spotted by someone.
  21. The Royal Martian Navy played a big role in WW2
  22. More like WGEU. On RU server this ship was a reward for an event. People look over the fact that it was deliberately made weak so it doesn't shadow over the Murmansk.
  23. Takeda92

    Some interesting info around the world

    A collectors ship, added for her historical significance. That tier is too low for competitive premiums anyway. Who do you want to compete against, newbies? I feel dirty enough just by sealclubbing in Katori. Yes, that Katori
  24. Takeda92

    Some interesting info around the world

    So people expect no downsides for torpedoes and fast top speed? The ship isn't out already and people are already complaining. As if WG have released any under performing premium in the past few months. In fact, all the premiums have been overperforming if not overpowered lately. People complained so much before Tirpitz was released, and now she is the easiest ship to play and do well in the game.
  25. Takeda92

    Scharnhorst GAMEPLAY and stats ...

    A cruiser killer shouldn't be good against battleships. However, this is the wows playerbase we are talking about. People can't stand having their premium ships with weaknesses.
×