Pikkozoikum

That's something, that I wanted to throw in all the time. Because people are often like "But submarines only hunt merchant ships". Even though they actually sunk warships in reality, it's more about that this is a game. And as far as I remember, every submarine game has the gameplay of sinking warships, even very old ones.

But the aircrafts didn't got "sunk". If a surface ship could send out small boats or controllable Aircrafts, then those would be still controllable after the ship sunk, I guess? If it's a balancing issue, it should be nerfed. But mostly I would say, if the carrier is sunk, it's often over anyways. I could assume, that the last squadron very rarely make a change in the outcome. I don't see an issue with that, the aircrafts got launched before he got sunk and those are controllable units, so just because the carrier got sunk, I see no reason why a player should lose controll about the aircrafts. That comparison doesn't work, because the DD has not multiple controllable units. What you describe is a ressurection type of mechanic. But the Aircraft doesn't resurrects anything, he just keeps flying his aircrafts, that got launched before he got sunk.

World of Warships is 1. Arcade-mode like game, not a simulation like DCS or any other Simulation 2. A naval battle game, where Aircraft Carrier played a big role In aircraft games, you play generally a single plane, not an Aircraft carrier and the squadron(s) Beside that, most Naval battles have planes. War Thunder, Steel Ocean, War on Sea, and probably mostly every other serious game

Think that will be the main reason, even yet not all T10s have legendary modules. Guess it takes also too much time to balance them

I would say, that the DDs have much influence duo their speed and concealment. So they are flexible, similar to the CV, which has the highest speed with planes BBs are more like a wheel of fortune, sometimes you are in the right spot with the right dispersion do devaste the enemy and sometimes you sit in the wrong spot without any influence and too slow to adjust that, imo So the BB can be op and up ^^

In that case, I think both DDs wanted to go very close for the torps for some reason .... xD I mean they actively moved towards the BB, and even if 1d does a mistake, no idea why the second DD came up with the same idea

In that case, I like the current version more. Submarines are invisible for surface ships at maximum depth and the only way to get away. I also like the idea being blind but also invisible, thats how a submarine should feel underwater

You never know... Maybe the enemy is so bad, that they throw the game. I had once a match, where 1 bb in our team remained and the enemy had 2 DDs and point advantage. Then one DD moves towards the BB, gets spotted and BB kills DD. Then second DD moves towards BB, gets spottted and BB destroys that DD as well.

But that's the point, we have no skill match maker, so you should expect, that there are people who play poorly. Reporting someone for playing poorl would only make sense, if there is a very good skill-matchmaker, and you get with someone matched, who got higher rated, but plays very low. Then it would make sense, because the report could be used to show, that he somehow got higher rated than his acutal skill

That's something you can compare. If you would see Warships as a sport and compare it in that way with a gun sport, then you need to get the same conditions. Is the gun sport with random teams? Is the gun sport with different classes? No, so obviously the gun sport won't "ruin the day", because you don't even have the initial conditions. And this "runining the day for 22 other persons" is very subjective and generalized. Many games have these type of designs. Sniper in shoorter, or specific heroes in RPGs and Mobas. This game is not balance by ship types and thus people will always receive damage in an "unfair" way. I don't say, that the CV Rework is perfectly fine, but it's also exxagerated, saying it's so broken and it's griefing... I think, no matter if reports do anythign or not, it's a negative impact, and nobody likes those. Even if you don't care, it's still unnessarcy at it's best. It's same like, if someone gets bullied in school. Why should anyone care about, what those bullies say? But yet the bullied person gets hurt, even if the bully is so meaningless and shouldn't be ignored. I think that's how humans work Torpedos and shells should also disappear, when the ships sunk... idk, it's a game decision and also it's realistic. An Air raid wouldn't stop, just because 100km further away their carrier got sunk ^^ They might even return to another carrier or island and strike again. But then, realism doesn't matter much, it's a game decision and if that was broken, they could remove it.

The report system has just no effect and it doesn't even matter if reported or not. But bmaybe some are just annoyed, if they get reported for playing normally that game without any negative attitude or cheating or what so ever

Yes, such as false-reporting, blaming, naming would be unsportive. It's not unsportive to use the tools/weapons/equipment, that the sport is offering you. In fencing sport you have foil, epee and sabre, using these weapons is not unsportive. Same like it's not unsportive to use DD, CA or CV My foil has a different grip, a shorter one, it's not unsportive to use a shorter one. There are even longer ones, which are allowed. I think there are definitions, depending on the game/sport. But you can be sure, that playing a class is not unsportive, if the developers offer that class. That makes 0 sense. Also the definitions are probably made by the provider, in this case WG, who also implemented the CV. If you think, that attacking someone with a CV for 5 minutes and consider that as griefing ,then we can consider, that any type of attack is griefing... for real, that's riduclous. If it's griefing: Report it to WG. Griefing is not allowed, as far as I know. I don't do that, just because a class bothers me. They don't deserve such report, because that would be a false usage of the report system and if the report system would be something serious, then such reports would have no effect. There would be no karma loss or any punishment. Punishments would be for real griefing and cheating or afking etc. But the report system is nothing serious and not even good. I mean you can report "played bad". Which makes 0 sense, because there is no skill match maker. So obvioulsy players get matched with bad players and those are of course bad, reporting them for being bad makes no sense, they didn't chose to play with good players.

Quoting wrong is actually false quoting ;P It's up to people do do something right or wrong, yes. False reports are wrong and in some cases even illegal It's also up to a person to kill someone, does that mean, that is okay? xD Doing the wrong is up to everyone, if he decides to do that, yes, but it's still wrong. But in the end, reporting is not really important anyways, it would matter more, if the reporting system would have any impact

And that is an act, that is supposed to be done by the Developers. As I mentioned earlier, it's not about the using itself, it's about "how it is used" A gun can be used for sport. Pulling a trigger is nothing bad, and should not get reported. A CV can be used in ga game. Playing a CV is nothing bad, and should not get reported. Using a gun for an illegal murder should be reported Using a CV for bug/glitch abuse should be reported to the Devs. I got a good example for Elite Dangerous Making money with selling stuff is nothing, that you have to report, it's supposed to be done. But there was a glitch or something, that you could a specific items over and over again to get tons of money. That had to be reported and the money, that got earned this way, got removed by the Devs.

I don't see that as a matter of subjectivity. I don't can go out irl and start reporting people for crimes, just because I don't like how they do something. False reports are false reports. And the game is supposed to be played, so the pure selection of a ship is not a report reason no matter if someone likes that ship or even the whole ship type. I mean, otherwise I need 20 or 30 reports a day, when I play BB and DDs "annoy" me. So I have to report them, because they picked DD^^

I think you mean guilty for a murder? A murderer is guilty for a murder. A player is being guilty for playing a game. One thing is illegal, the other not . The comparison is quite bad, because a gun is not supposed to murder illegaly by default. A gun can be used as self-defence or in a war or as a sport. All these uses are not illegal. That comparison would only work, if a player uses the CV and knows some kind of game breaking glitch, that is not allowed or supposed to being used. Technically the sling shot drop could be something like that, though it was not a glitch, just a "mechanic" that wasn't considered by the devs So reporting a CV player just for playing a CV is like reporting a Person with a gun to the police just for owning a gun or using it as sport and training.

Ich hab nicht von Anfang an gespielt, hatte aber mal von einem Youtuber gehört, dass es die Overpens nicht von Anfang an gab

That's why the earth is flat, otherwise torpedos would always bug around! The proof

I don't see an optical illusion, he aims at the DM and against the island^^

Well, irl-arguments never work, otherwise nobody would play Destroyer, they would be 10 times weaker than a BB or a crusier. You can see that kinda in WarThunder, DDs struggle to damage cruisers and BBs, but those can one shot them or at least damage them so heavily, that they can't do anything than reparing in case the crew survived. It's a gameplay decision I think the arces are more around 18km a problem

Only bow in on long range. Otherwise a Yamato can citadell a Midway even through the bow. On long ranges any ship is hard to kill, even a Shimakaze, when she is on 18km :3

No experience yet, but I would probably keep shooting HE, because I play japanese ships. They have 100mm with 30mm pen or they have the 127mm with buffed HE damage.

Mayb a Desync issue. He gives the fire-order and his client is recognizing it and drops the trops Desync happens and server notices that order a tiny bit later and launches the torpedos after the aim is a tiny bit later to the left. So the client is ahead and the server follows later with a wrong aim But that's just an assumption

Hmm, weird, it felt like the rockets do more damage. Against Repu almost 13k with japanese planes, can't remember having that ever before. And someone mentioned the dispersion here, so I thought, they changed something

though I think that is acutally good. People are complaining about, that the CV is almighty, so there is some way to play against a CV, that he is somehow defensiveless, unless it's a secondary GZ