wilkatis_LV

I wonder why do people think CV rework will be a general nerf for them? It's less exciting than watching grass grow, but how could that ever be a nerf when you basically move at jet speeds with AA nerfed below the ground?

Nothing has changed, it's just RNG as per usual Even accurate ships like Yamato and Montana can get those salvos, not even talking about something like GK on whom you most likely don't have ASM1 in 3rd slot.

Allright, lets see: Right, clearly nothing here refers to current CVs instead of the rework on PTS. Clearly. And again, you are avoiding the answer for your 9 out of 10. Going to do that for long?

I think what you fail to understand is that he's complaining about CVs as they are RIGHT NOW, not the CV rework Also - just like Robber_Baron - I'd like to see your source for that "9 out of 10...". You've been asked about it multiple times, please stop avoiding the answer

You didn't get any doubloons for this period because WG gifted you WPA with the same duration as your PA still had left in it. That would be those 57 days you mentioned. You lost nothing, your original PA (in this case for WoT) is running at the same time as your new & improved WPA (in WoWS) Any new PA you get while having WPA will give you those doubloons

Last post from OP before this one:

This has nothing to do with a ship, fire resistances for non-CV ships are tier locked. Richelieu catches fire exactly as easily / hard as every single other t8 non-CV without a single exception That is nothing more than an assumption. You often overpen broadside cruisers at close ranges as your shells are going too fast to explode before leaving the ship

It's not about citadelling them, it's the fact that past 13km you wont have enough pen to go through their main belt. For t8 BBs that's likely even a bit closer than those 13 Secondary build is hilarious on PEF. Totally worth it imho. Just that manual secondaries doesn't do much if the ship is t6 or lower Meanwhile if you want to build your KM BBs tanky - she can handle that too. So I wouldn't say no to it

All of that is in the first pages of these threads. Basic points are: Don't bother shooting BBs waterline (main belt) past 13km Cruisers can be citadelled at any range Never underestimate concealment builds regardless of what else you are going for Usually keep your speed up Keep wiggling a lot, similarly to how you would do in ships like Nagato Angle against AP, you are absolutely able to tank it. Don't go bow in to it, this isn't t8+ Dropping speed + turning makes you lose speed insanely fast. Use this to dodge effectively

But when will I read & spam the chat then? Was going to write this aswell just probably as WAD, enough of them know how to reverse as soon as the game starts

It's a "premium", they don't get nerfed. Afaik Black hasn't changed a single bit. It's a Fletcher with trollishly slow torps (Khaba & LeTerrible (in this ships case even if you have torp acceleration) actually go faster than those) but you have the broken combination of Smoke + Radar. Not that a 7.5km 24s radar is particularly strong, it's just the combo of things.

Funny how you keep forgetting this: With a x2 multiplier instead of the normal x3 / x4 on rather weak base values With a 3min (premium) or 4min (standard) cooldown - CV can normally drop you twice (or even more if you get close enough) during a single cooldown - that's ofc assuming they didn't AP-bomb delete you with the 1st squad that approached you through your DefAA Probably becuase if they leave that island they will be dead within seconds. Takes nothing more than an AP salvo in the side for that. And that bow is far from being super tanky, just don't fire at the waterline. The 50mm belt is sitting very low, nearly all of it is 25mm which you can freefarm It's a BATTLECRUISER, class which aren't separated out on their own Can't wiat for Azuma to be released and to have similar performance to Stalingrad - dmg output between CAs and BBs. Exactly like they should Or what about t9? Kronstadt clearly does more dmg than any cruisers! Could it again be the case that CBs would do that? Zao on Zao - 8 of 12 shells as citadels (66.67% hits) Stalin on Zao - 5 of 9 shells as citadels (55.56% hits) (or since Stalingrads are always island-hugging and bow-on -> 5 of 6 shells as citadels (83.33% hits)) If we look at kill by pen dmg (without saturation) Zao on Zao - 24 pens = 2 salvos in 13.7s + flight after the 1st shot Stalin on Zao - 15 pens = 2 salvos in 20s + flight after the first shot (or since Stalingrads are always island-hugging and bow-on -> 15 pens = 3 salvos in 40s + flight after the 1st shot) And since they don't have 100% hitrate - with every miss Stalingrad loses more dmg output that Zao, simply because she has less guns firing Your point was...? Just dropping it once more since you still seem unable to get it: That's because of how high up Moskvas 50mm plating goes. It covers like 2/3 of the bow. Meanwhile Stalingrad gets a small strip right above the waterline, would be lucky if that reached even 1/3 of the bows height If you are in a spot where you have to choose between to whom you give your side and against whom you angle = you are already mispositioned. You didn't die because they had a Stalingrad, you died because you screwed up

Oh the irony of him going "can't hit anything", yet his 1 game in randoms with PEF has 41.25% hitrate and in 21 ranked games 39.13% hitrate, which he can't get even close to in any other BB Citadelling crusiers - he can't know he would have citadelled instead of overpening them, that's nothing more than a baseless assumption No citadels on BBs - good for you, meanwhile others have done it Struggling to do 60k in a 5v5 t6, what a surprise. That 60k is worth like 2 full cruisers in health No issues in Arizona - the WR difference and the hitrate difference clearly shows that "Secondaries when fully spec'd go 6.5km" - 7.56km actually "Fire % is just not there" - actually it's quite average for the caliber So yeah, clearly that opinion is based on actual performance rather than hearing a lot of , getting that in his head and then going by his feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeels instead of facts

Doubt all those values are known Base disp: With ASM in 3rd slot:

Yeah, afaik that's the number they're going for. We should know the finalized number wherever they'll release patchnotes, so... around 15th Jan?

Asked LWM about the turning radius, she has tested it and it is those same 800m as listed. So as predicted my feeeeeeeeling was off, those turns aren't tighter than they were supposed to be.

I'm wondering how did I see those as triple-barrel turrets? Also - yeah, should have just checked the name at the Stern... oh well, glad someone did it correctly

Actually I'm pretty sure that would be the BBs. DDs come in close 2nd

Uhh... 1st of all I have no idea what you mean. But my best guess is that you don't quite know the difference between the test server and live server...?

If I'm not mistaken the cap is something like 4 CVs per team

Ever heard of A and D keys? (alternatively Q and E keys?) Or maybe a keyboard in general? Is it slow? No. Is it slower? Yes. Also both have the same 18.2km range which is far from being short at t6/7 You mean by every BB with 358mm or larger guns? That's only half of t6, nearly all t7 and all t8+ BBs. But that's the same for every t6 & 7 BB, all of them have a 25mm bow / general plating. Nelson actually gets quite a lot of 32mm sections which other BBs get only starting with t8

"We can't test stuff in test environment" has to be one of my favorite things WG have claimed in the recent history At least get stuff half-balanced before you plan any kind of release instead of just showing middle finger to everyone willing to play the game in the next 4...5 months... if not even longer

Oh right, this Concealment changes will probably require a lot of tweaking & rebalancing CV changes most definitely needs a lot of tweaking and balancing Why the hell are those 2 being released together? Especially since the influx of planes will completely screw with concealment??!

29.4 with a flag, but since now I know how hard it is for you to understand anything that involves words and / or numbers I guess you can be forgiven Funny thing about that - I'm going in detail there to explain it & to make you finally understand dispersion, as despite what you think - you actually are quite clueless as to how it works. So go ahead and read up on it

I mean, everyone knows that, we don't need a book written about it