wilkatis_LV

And everyone else is talking about the rework. Rather obviously, since with the rework you loose that control ability which this whole thread is about

The lack of that extra "u" bugged me aswell

That plane view WASD is for... planes. Afaik the only way you control the ship while controlling planes is by setting autopilot commands on the map. And let me tell you, autopilot is bloody useless, especially if there is an island within a few km of you

What I find rather amusing is that the 3 most played DDs - Shima, Gearing and Z - are the 3 worst performing ones. Every category, except that Shima now outperforms the nerfed YY in kills per battle. Potato power! That leads to me questioning if the ship is underperforming because it's weak (it might be, as you pointed out), or is it so simply because of the amount of clueless potatoes playing it? But that we'll never know, we can just speculate

Well, I remember someone claiming they got PTSD from... was it twitter? I guess snowflakes are capable of anything stupid these days

Yamato and Shimakaze would like to have a word with you

Ranked being in an odd tier is the whole point of this - CVs are only in even tiers, and they are far from bring balanced.

And what exactly was wrong in that video? That's a perfectly normal BB salvo. Hell, he actually landed one on that DD, that alone might make it above average Or, or, or... wait for it... maybe nothing changed and it's time for you to get your tinfoil hat off? Fun fact: Every day that's not a patch day every ship + most ships on days that are patch days are affected by "wasn't changed". Such a struggle Note: We changed nothing. Carry on, you have been notified! Yeah, that would have been a nice one Seeing how there isn't any "problem" to begin with - you could say it's already fixed! Don't want to take our word for it? When this got popular (quite a while ago btw, you are really late to this party) LWM did her standard dispersion test on Missouri and compared it to the same test from way back. Results?

Either you played RANDOM battles, or you DIDN"T meet a CV. Ranked is t9, there are no t9 CVs They are there. A lot of them. Stop playing gamemodes where they are excluded (ranked) and don't play Co-Op where they don't yet have AI developed for them. Go play random battles where lots of people are testing their CVs Read again yourself: THERE ARE NO CVS IN THE RANKED AS THERE ARE NO T9 CVS Clear now? Oh now it's Random not Ranked? Div up (in RANDOM match) with someone who plays a CV, enemy team will be forced to have at least one of them then

Depends on which premium you buy: Standard Premium Account: +50% credits +50% XP Note that increase in XP also serves to increase your FreeXP and CaptainXP due to how they are calculated Works cross-platform, so also on WoT and WoWP, if you play thsoe Warships Premium Account: +50% credits +65% XP Note that increase in XP also serves to increase your FreeXP and CaptainXP due to how they are calculated Works only in WoWS The duration is real-time from the moment you buy it, not "play time".

At the same time I find NA layout incredibly impractical massively favoring the EU one. Whenever I have some reason to be on the NA Forums page I just can't find anything there. It's simply a question of what you're used to

Well, technically the new CVs are an inverse version of SC - you don't really control the ship, you control the drones

It's already there, you can't disable it

Uhh, anyone able to translate this from "Milan" to "English"? Especially the "wide see" part? Also I think @Milan_G_ believes you can launch aircraft from land-based airfields in this game... Someone has played too much operation Ultimate Frontier Yes Jesus Christ, his English usually is highly meh, but in this one... that's straight up not English

Hmm, it should be 31 there Report it as a bug, most likely it's just incorrect text in port

https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/111812-eu-weekend-server-issues-compensation/

Seeing how this... https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/general-news/eu-server-compensation/ ...and this... https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/111812-eu-weekend-server-issues-compensation/ ...exist, what exactly is the point of your post?

Yeah, typical faildiv situation The "rare" part comes from WG screwing up with the MirrorMM. Any chance you have screenshots of those 2 games? I'm more than willing to bet enemies had the same kind of faildiv as you had. That or someone sat in queue for too long, but that too would probably be visible from the same ship list

Np Well, if it's somewhat on topic here's my 2 cents: Dispersion area (ellipse) matters a lot Sigma is a tag-along scale which matters only based on dispersion and relatively to other sigma values I'd take IJN BBs smaller dispersion, lower sigma over USN BBs larger dispersion, higher sigma any day. The difference in sigma is so small that the actually noticeable difference in hitrates will come from differences in their dispersion areas Similarly between Amagi and Kii, both having identical dispersion, that 0.1 sigma difference is nearly worthless, it really doesn't change anything. 1 shell in a 100 maybe, that's it. Meanwhile Fusos 1.5 vs Yamatos 2.1 is a significant difference with relatively similar dispersion areas. So yeah, it's very much a case-by-case basis, depending on what you are comparing to what.

What always amuses me are the Stalingrads in CB with Ovechkins improved SE (+4k hp), there's so many of them lately Charles Baguette and St.Baguette - I can't even imagine those 2 without LS, their rudder is basically perma-knocked out Expert Rear Gunner KGV, don't forget that one

I mean, was there any point to his post? I skimmed over it, and it looks like he's just arguing some semantics for which word we should use, and then assumes that sigma is more important than dispersion, to which I personally disagree.

Is it the same ship? Those checks are ship-based, what you selected on one ship won't affect any others in your port Is it on the same computer? Lots of these settings are saved client-side, so your settings can differ between multiple PCs

Mostly plays BBs, Cruisers are in clsoe 2nd Whines about SE I'm pretty sure that skill isn't meant for you

Caliber. Full 50mm of difference, with all the overmatch change that comes with it 0.1 change in sigma is as irrelevant as buffs get. Expect additional less than 1% more shells landed on target If not even more, Colorado's the only ship in the game able to keep up with Derpitz in the amount of buffs received

Concrete counterweights, that 617 is it's "equivalent" in armour