Hanszeehock
-
Content Сount
3,692 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
5959 -
Clan
[COSTS]
Everything posted by Hanszeehock
-
I like both. But English beer is pretty unique and not really comparable to German
-
I rest my case.
-
Can we please push for clans/fleets/etc integration into this game?
Hanszeehock replied to Andreevson's topic in General Discussion
What do you think ? This game needs organised team battles asap. CW cannot come soon enough, provided it is not unified with WoT. -
What Deamon is saying is that these patch notes are not the final version and are subject to change. That is why the ST is under NDA. The reason is obvious.
-
What will u do with [edited] mix tier division
Hanszeehock replied to TheDarkUnicorn's topic in General Discussion
Personally I would only permit a +1/-1 tier difference in the make up of Divisions. -
Poll about bundles, player spending and the reputation of Wargaming EU.
Hanszeehock replied to MrFingers's topic in General Discussion
Yes you are correct and I apologise. -
Poll about bundles, player spending and the reputation of Wargaming EU.
Hanszeehock replied to MrFingers's topic in General Discussion
Oh and I'm not a can of dog food, chum. -
Poll about bundles, player spending and the reputation of Wargaming EU.
Hanszeehock replied to MrFingers's topic in General Discussion
Ich komme aus England ! -
Poll about bundles, player spending and the reputation of Wargaming EU.
Hanszeehock replied to MrFingers's topic in General Discussion
My point was the thread title was misleading and was not changed. I'm glad you agree the number is not 50%. -
Poll about bundles, player spending and the reputation of Wargaming EU.
Hanszeehock replied to MrFingers's topic in General Discussion
Calling me names is not going to change anyone's mind. Anyway who is trolling now ? -
LOL bring it on ! You care because you are a [edited]
-
Poll about bundles, player spending and the reputation of Wargaming EU.
Hanszeehock replied to MrFingers's topic in General Discussion
MrFingers, on 13 December 2015 - 05:36 PM, said: Then I wholeheartedly invite WG to copy this poll, and make it an item in the ingame portal. They have done surveys in the past, so while it's quite rare, it's not a unicum. To whoever WG-staff who is reading this: please do! I doubt they would use the same possible answers. For example, in question 6 regarding 'limited time' you have two possible positive answers and four negatives. In Q7 you have three possible answers beginning with 'yes' and six with 'no'. So not really helpful is it. 22cm, on 13 December 2015 - 05:40 PM, said: May I remind you that half of the initial playerbase already vanished? Do you have any ideas why? You can remind me of a thread title that was shown to be based on completely false stats. Even MrFingers admitted he made a mistake in his OP and quoted numbers from the NA server, not EU. To keep repeating this rubbish doesn't help anyone, the only person I wish would vanish is you. -
Poll about bundles, player spending and the reputation of Wargaming EU.
Hanszeehock replied to MrFingers's topic in General Discussion
Because it is most likely to be completed by people who agree with you. It is pointless because it will only cover a tiny percentage of the playerbase who can be bothered to fill it in. The only numbers that matter are the sales figures and the only people who have them are WG. -
Poll about bundles, player spending and the reputation of Wargaming EU.
Hanszeehock replied to MrFingers's topic in General Discussion
I clearly care about the issue, otherwise why would I spend so much time trying to educate the ignorant ? As usual you completely miss the point. We have had load of posts and threads about bundles, is a poll produced by someone completely biased that has a self selecting sample really going to help ? -
Well I'm obviously effective at winding you up, as for testing it's just another thing you are completely ignorant about.
-
Poll about bundles, player spending and the reputation of Wargaming EU.
Hanszeehock replied to MrFingers's topic in General Discussion
Not a fair comparison. Star Citizen was crowd funded, this game is not. -
Poll about bundles, player spending and the reputation of Wargaming EU.
Hanszeehock replied to MrFingers's topic in General Discussion
Because it's the same people making those threads ? -
Poll about bundles, player spending and the reputation of Wargaming EU.
Hanszeehock replied to MrFingers's topic in General Discussion
Did we really need another thread about bundles ? -
Oh dear. Obviously I do not agree my arguments are stupid. I am trying to explain why a company like WG would follow the policy they do. I have repeated said I think WG should offer both non bundled and bundled content. I have no intention of winding anyone up or attention seeking unlike a lot of people who post in these threads. Let's be honest, you just cannot stand people offering an alternative view. Instead you just want to talk in your whine fest bubble to like minded people. And this is the guy who has purchased nearly every bundle. Please grow up.
-
I only use type 1 on DDs and type 2 on everything else. BBs and CAs have such high detectability that reducing it by 3% is pointless. Clearly, reducing your chance of being hit by more shells is more useful for a larger target.
-
Which Countries and how did they collapse ? Obviously you have run out of arguments as you have to resort to the Supertester thing.
-
But they are not nearly two years out of date. They are the most up to date figures. Also 2014 ended just over 11 months ago, not two years ago
-
My point is you charge what the market will bear. However, what you have pointed out is exactly why the Euro is a failure and the single market doesn't work very well.
-
Don't try to be smart, it doesn't suit you. Your point was the figures were outdated, my point was they are the most recent available because you cannot have figures for 2015 when the year has not ended.
-
News flash, 2014 is the most recent year that figures are available. Next news flash, 2015 hasn't ended yet
