Hanszeehock

I probably will, but will need the whole month

It would sell in its thousands regardless of price. So no brainer really from a business viewpoint.

You know only base XP plus premium counts, nothing else ?

Hey I'm a RN fanboi

If they had left her the same, she would have been even more stupidly OP vs planes

But that's the Atlanta

You are correct. She is less manoeuvrable than NY. She was nerfed this way after the first period of testing.

She is more expensive for NA

It's just a modded event flag. I have it on all my ships

Anyway here she is in my Port. Obviously the main difference from New York is the mass of AA guns on her decks I think she is modelled after the ship as she is now, which is essentially her 1945 configuration.

My bad, you are right. I suppose I was a noob and chose Main Battery Mod 2 to increase turret turn time at the expense of range. So compared to the NY my Texas experience seemed so much better. Of course some ppl will be tempted in this slot to use AA mod 2 which combined with the relevant Captain skills increases the AA value to 72.

A must buy. A fun ship, but it's not just about the AA. What make the Texas better than the NY is the range module, which brings her up to 18.1km and therefore very competitive.

The easiest way to to it, is by capping and defending base in domination mode. I did it in the Yorck, only did 18k damage, 2 caps and defended base a couple of times. Killing DDs helps. With the x3 had over 14k XP.

Actually one of this weeks five missions has been delayed until Monday for technical reasons. That particular mission will run Monday to Monday and give you the 'missing' 20 diamonds. All future weekies will be 5 x 20 diamonds in value.

I suggest you read this thread : http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/50228-okey-seriously-im-pink-after-1-accident/page__fromsearch__1 From the latest patch the criteria for being a teamkiller and turning pink was reduced to one teamkill. If you do not cause any further team damage you will go back to normal after a few battles

Exactly my view.

So totally pointless thread then

You don't have to buy.

Before the change was implemented there was quite an issue with ships constantly going in and out of detection, which gave them an appearance of 'blinking'. It was particularly prevalent for players with low spec PCs.

Typical response. SA is clearly working as intended. It was around before 0.5.5, at least as far as I am concerned from my own playing experience. Simply calling people liars without clear evidence and no obvious intent is not going to win you any arguments.

It is to prevent 'blinking'. This was quite an issue in early game versions.

I do not think the video is conclusive. It could have been a blindshot. Have been part of testing of the 3 secs delay on a test server. So cannot produce replays. However, in all scenarios the 3 seconds delay worked perfectly. I'm not saying I agree with the delay and certainly the SA description should be changed, but I understand why it is needed.

My bad !

I think it's Dreadnought

Working as intended