Mr_Snoww

Not sure what crap you are babbling on about Mount olympus but there have been countless Screenshots of people getting the same results as me. So no we are not balancing around me we are balancing around everyone.

Well judging from the drop pattern if I hit and average of 4 torps per run then at least 50% of them were on the bow or stern and if I hot 6 torps in a run then either 33% or 66% were on the bow or stern unless the ship is turning away and manages to eat all torps on the belt.

Not to sound rude but yes obviously I have...

so tell me then. if your stats site shows that midways damage is increasing, why is the overall damage decreasing on wows stats and numbers?

Funny how the stats you found were vastly different to the ones on wows stats and numbers. Hmmm

Bare in mind if you are getting 35 torp hits in a game that is going to be most of the game spent torping therefore not much time for bombing etc. And there is so much more that is wanted from CVs but apparently we are too dumb to have them.

You would be right if the torps didn't just tickle ships. Let me put this simply for you. Midway torps have the worst flooding chance, the worst speed, the worst damage, and the worst aiming reticle when evening making a slight adjustment during a drop. Yes her bombs are very powerful hut that shouldn't mean her other armanent needs to be made obselete.

So 35 torp hits with 2 floods on average is acceptable? Lmao I think someone is just a bit salty don't you? ;)

yeh.... :)

ive watched some videos about AA mechanics and it seems that WG doesnt disclose all the information about the damage that AA auras do. WG need to make ALL information about AA values public so that we can know how to counter it. look what happened in RTS CVs when you made mechanics hidden (counter strafing, side strafing etc). and im sure that there are other hidden values in game that are hidden which would be useful to be made public. any information if WG intend to make these public? @MrConway @Crysantos if not then they need to make plans to do so.

mainly the time it takes for each dmg tick on AA DPS

A full cash refund is the only acceptable compensation for nerfing premium ships directly which WG said they would never do. I don't care what they do to them as long as they offer everyone a full cash refund. They know for a fact that many people have an abundance of doublok s and nothing to spend them on and they are still thinking that doubloons is and acceptable compensation. @MrConway

We can research them next patch anyway so no point wasting money on containers to get implacable

you want more powerful AA? *Edit*

CVs would actually be healthy for CB. They would make the gameplay less static as island hugging ships will get punished. They would also add a new level of gameplay to it that has never been there before. Now don't get me wrong, RTS CV was much better suited to CB as it was far more counterable and required far more skill to be effective with, but we have to work with what we have right now. All these people saying that the CV is not ready for CB obviously mean that they need nerfs (mainly to spotting and a bit to damage dealing). The problem with that is if you nerf CVs much more they will become useless and people would just bring a 2nd battleship in place of a CV. The only thing that the current CVs would need to be viable to CB is a cool down timer between sending planes out and at the start of the game just like RTS did. So let's say you have to wait 25 secdons at the start before a squadron is ready and when you return a squad you have to wait 15 seconds before launching another one. Other than that there are no more nerfs to you can give it to make you people happy that wouldn't destroy the class. Oh and be for you ask. Yes I have played CB before... Obviously.

no... CVs do not need any more nerfs. they have been nerfed more than the khaba at this point.

special signals is literally the only answer to give. its as black and white as use special signals or play a lot, or do both. im quite sure he can work out how long it will take him from the free xp he gets in 1 game using some simple maths.

nope nothing. which is why im not exactly happy with WGs policy on refunding things with doubloons

here is my self control, mixed with a bit of no lifing :P

1 million free xp can be ground in a week with the right signals

So I guess it's still NOPE to Hull control then lol. Instead you use the Alt key for some thing useless when it clearly could have been used to swithh between Hull and plane control

The flooding change was completely unesecary anyway. It just panders to battleships who cannot manage their damage control properly and dont look out for torps. The change needs to be reverted as flooding should severely punish people and not just tickle their HP for 40 seconds (around 20 seconds if you have all flooding signals and captain skills).

oh that explains it then. ive only played the cleveland today haha

cant believe anyone has bought the ship for 25 quid.

so why the big NDA on it when it hasnt really changed?