walik_hracka

"Hidden maneuvers" - deterioration - vol. 3: Mine field should be used to block areas and not to damage ships directly / immediately. My previous comments (vol.1, vol.2) would not be problem if I can avoid the mines. So I would increase the mines activation time drasticaly that it would not have any sense to lay it down directly on a ship because even the slowest ship would have enough time to leave it (even starting from stacionary position and even driving in revers).

I like the "Ocean" port change. However, for me, colorful natural corals would be much better on the bottom than unnatural shapes.

"Hidden maneuvers" - unnecessarily unfair matchmaking: Enemy got 2 special carriers we got non. What's the "surprise"!

"Hidden maneuvers" - deterioration - vol. 2: Depth charges by Mainz also does not seem to work properly against mines as desired. I got 32 "mines" stripes but I had not recognised any minefield to disappear. At least not in front of me. Btw Report after battle (3rd page) also does not show any data related to mines.

Unfortunately, "Hidden maneuvers" are the reason why I finally learned a new English word: "deterioration" Minefield makes me realize I was wrong when I thought the guided missiles (torps) from submarines were the only bad thing WG could come up with. However, I am still undecided as to which is worse. Is it the mine field with absurdly short activation time, absurdly long duration without knowing how long (for the enemy mines), and absurd impossibility to defend or avoid it in any way? Please! can not I eliminate the mines for example by shooting it with artilery or something? The developers blog "You can destroy mines using Depth Charge Airstrike" is a lay. It did not work at all. I used it 4 times by Atlântico without any sign of success Edit after replay: Depth Charge Airstrike used 3x in a row to identical single minefield. It destroys few single mines (I got no idea where the 16 strips come from?) but not the field. Mines destruction not visible in the 3rd page report after battle.

Please, I hope WG will work out the new setup so that I don't have to redo the whole settings*) from scratch because that would be pretty annoying. (See also my initial bug comment) *) Edit: Word correction

Our bot, right at the beginning, hit the beach of the island in the middle of nothing*) with no boats (obstacles) around. Unfortunately nothing exceptional. *) Edited word correction.

Bot Fuso erorr position on Scenario map ("M"). (Square r6,c10; time 2023.07.01 17:38:03 CETS)

Thank you. However it is terrible to lose all my settings so I hope WG will solve the black screen better for the live server.

Web link from CZ test anouncement web page points to wrong forum pages (not to this one). Application does not start correctly = only black screen (original settings = windowed mode 1600x900)

I was just fighting with Azuma against R.Lauria. He hits me 20 000 damage in 2 salvos (sum of 4 granades) along my ship axis - no broadside, long distance (average 5 000 damage with single SAP shell under any angle). Are you serious? Another "balanced" ship? And let me guess - a premium one.

As possibly already mentioned, Why the heck there is marked as "New" everything while I do not see anything new there? The purpose of the "New" highlighting is corrupted in this way and it become just another spam.

Below is a picture from the harbour where the ship parameters window is hiding behind pop-ups messages. Worse, I am not allowed to hide the pop-ups by a mouse click (or whatever) and I am forced to wait untill the pop-ups dissapear automaticaly. That could be really long time for example after several battles chain restarted directly from the battle results report/screen. Note: this is not new and I already comented it during test 0.11.6

I like the feature I can take same ship in next battle while the previous one is still runnin. However, I am afraid I miss the information if the last battle reprot is already available or not yet. It is possible to remember time stamp of the last awailable report but it is quite uncomfortable. Can you please create some mark to let me know about the runing battle status? See picture for an example. Please remember that same ship can be in more than one unfinished battle.

Question to developers team while they are introducing still new feaures: Does they have any idea how many keys their game actualy requires to be controled by? I roughly counted 42 keys!!! ... Seriously? Seems like one keyboard soon would not be enough. Please keep in mind that the "shift" and "alt" keys are already ocupied.

Or new icon appearance on old (left) position might be good too?

Docks: The new reward system, i.e. 9 stages as the final reward of the final set of missions, would mean a 30% increase in price [doubloons/CZK] for me. That would mean I'm not participating this time. This would mean that for the money and time saved, I can go to the cinema maybe 5 times instead of playing. ... And that's actually good! Thank you!

Burst fire mode icon position was changed to worse for me. Please keep it as it was. (used to be) On the left side from the shell icon was more logic and more easy to overview. Further more in this test on the right side it is hiden behing minimap for me. So new I see definitely worse than old. PS: I can not remap te key in port anyway so I do not see any reason. So it does not have any positive impact for me. Add edit 2023.04.10: Might be if the islands on minimap could be transparent too?

If I do something overcomplicated and it does not work, to make it even more complicated usually makes it even worse. Please, cannot you give something reasonable to do to your developing team that they will stop to be bored? Then they hopefully might stop to be thinking such nonsenses out.

TROUBLE IN THE HOT TUB The "cruisers" are armless and easy to kill. The mode is interesting but overcomplicated and according to Wargaming policy for many years (unfair for some ships).

To jako že ten in-game web prohlížeč po letech konečně začne správně fungovat? ... To asi spíše ne.

Na "Operace" a na "Střelecké závody" jsou dobré. PS: Nechápu, proč Wargaming pojmenoval "Kooperativní bitva" něco, co není ani "kooperativní", ani "bitva".

Neexistující hybridní loď Nebraska ... beru to tak že existující USS Nebraska (BB-14) v plánu není a nikdy nebude. Chápu, reálné lodě jsou nuda. Kdo by se s nimi dělal když můžeme vystavět tolik vzdušných zámků ... ehm ... lodí.

Děkuji za rychlou reakci Nicméně hlavní problém, nejen v tomto případě, mám s tím, že podpora je rozškatulkovaná a já nevím do které škatulky ten ticket poslat. Prosím s tím hlavně bych uvítal pomoc. (screenshot jako nápovědu? ) Co se týká odlinkování / nalinkování, tak si to samozřejmě nepamatuji a vyloučit to nemohu. Pokud se to stalo, tak to bylo jen na několik minut. Zkoušel jsem najít nějakou historii, ale nic jsem nenašel, pouze dole přiložený screenshot ze správy mého WG účtu, přičemž nevím zda datum je od posledního slinkování (pak jsem to neměnil) a nebo z prvního slinkování (a pak to není použitelná informace). Předem děkuji.

Prosím jak mohu řešit chybějící měsíční "membership bonuses" z "Maritime Club on YouTube!"? Poslední jsem zaznamenal 8.12.2022. Časového omezení pro bonus jsem si nevšimnul. Na podpoře (https://eu.wargaming.net/) jsem nenašel žádnou použitelnou kolonku a podporu na YouTube jsem nenalezl vůbec a tak se ptám zde.