lovelacebeer

As I understood it from their previous statement this is only temporary for one month and then they will return the option for old designers table.

If I remember correctly that’s how we got the smoke timer as it proved so popular with mod packs so there is some hope we could get a score timer added. @YabbaCoe not asking for any promise but could it be possible to pass along this suggestion for adding such a timer, it would be helpful.

Well WG have learnt with sub testing that it’s a really easy way to make people do testing for them, understandably a lot of people want the rewards. Doing it this way plenty of people submit to WGs will without having to be offered any extra incentive.

I got the Missouri back when she was free XP and whilst I still love playing her if you have an Iowa unless your really into US military history I wouldn’t bother honestly. Over all the Iowa is the superior ship and the only real advantage of the Missouri is the radar, but these days so many ships have radar it’s not as big of a deal anymore. I would suggest holding onto your doubloons for something more interesting.

I just love her rate of fire

Im sure they have chapter 1 British fishermen and Chapter 2 Norwegian fishermen, both riveting stories of glorious heroism.

I just really wish WG would add such a score timer into the vanilla game it is very convenient especially in those very close games.

I find CO OP too unreliable for kills as it’s such a race against teammates so I went for a high rate of fire in random battles. I was lucky and got 4 kills in my Des Moines in the first attempt but my back up plan was Omaha given her guns and torps.

So your argument is surface ships need to be map aware but submarines don’t? That is the issue in question your shifting claims of map awareness. It’s not about mixing cases, after all your such a big fan of making comparisons just as you keep comparing to DDs, this is just another comparison. I know from all you have written previously your arguments are devoid of any logic but you could at least try to be consistent in your arguments.

You seem to have considerably changed your stance on situational awareness since our last discussion. Given how vehemently you argued that a good position was always a good position, not to mention your argument that situational awareness is of no use if some gets so close to you and you don’t see them coming:

I tried the convoy mode on PTS and I enjoyed it it’s fast paced and rewards reasonably aggressive play ( it’s worth trying to get the team to agree if your focusing transports or not). Still it is such a missed opportunity for their beloved submarine program. Im also really happy for the resetting of operations rewards, I still dive into operations from time to time and would be a good reason for others too as well (as apparently WG says no one play OPs)

I will get the SC after that not so bothered.

Outside of the RU server I cannot understand why anyone would be foolish enough to spend doubloons to accelerate getting these ships in early access. Still of course some mad fools will.

I know only an operation but still I do find Newport the most challenging OP mainly due to the teammates.

My guess is it proved to popular with people using them to farm doubloons.

I am very happy to see that operations rewards will be reset I hope that if enough people play operations again it might convince WG to actually put some work back into their development.

I’m just awaiting our resident fanatic to turn up and deliver one of his customary rants explaining why we are all wrong. On the topic of the speed of submarines it is genuinely shocking how fast they are and considering in most situations of a sub running away will be returning to the relative safety their team, I can only imagine how many DD players will be tricked into such foolish headlong rushes.

It was a close run battle, just a pity our flanks DD decided to suicide. Still I was amazed how long you were able to survive in the Krispy Kreme, well played sir.

That table is worryingly accurate to describe my meetings in the wonderfully named Petty France building.

Yeh I cannot see it being very likely WG would be willing to do that with the EU crowd we are a far more unruly lot compared to our docile NA cousins.

To be fair you need the best submarines around when your hunting Norwegian fishermen

I’m sure the almighty spreed sheet will show WG know what they are doing by not giving all ships ASW especially the brawling ones.

I would love to see more ships from the pre dreadnought age as well as the latter ironclads the designers were often creative as well as bonkers. Sadly though WG are utterly uninteresting in developing lower tier fun which I feel is a real loss.

Hello all just a heads up there is a new bonus code from instagram: 90KCAPTSONTHEGRAM It gave me 300 community tokens and a cartographic camo

Sadly although it appears a lot of us would be in favour of some kind of inclusion of submarines in the game. The problem is the vast majority of respondents do not like submarines as WG have developed them (myself included). This is why when having the whole submarine debate it is in my opinion at least best to always ask the question “do you like submarines as WG have developed them?”.