lovelacebeer

Much appreciated and hope your having a great time aboard her.

WG trying to make their egregious submarine project work:

I believe I can fly

If you played to the best of your ability and can look back on the battle knowing you did the best you could then who cares what they said, lets face it a lot of the stuff said across online gaming is pretty much this:

https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/244653-vigenere-mission-set-a-hidden-binary-code-right-in-front-of-us/ I think your further along than they are, Reddit also seems lost.

Sadly it looks like the NA forum is as equally stumped as we are

And your reply was also witty and fun, there is a nice healthy banter here on the forum. Anyway I pride myself on being able to have civilized reasonable discussions or banter with pretty much anyone (although there might be one irritating individual I find insufferable) you sir were as always a delight.

Well its one way to dodge my torps:

Don't worry I have long become used to your rants and attempted to stifle genuine debate, hence this whole effort of yours to yet again sidetrack someone elses point and certainly not for the purposes of debate. As for the typo, whilst it was the most likely eventuality, however your track record for flip flopping on topics for no discernable reason I choose to take what you said to be what you meant. Anyway I have stated my view on on the oddity of the ASW of BBs being better than on DDs, why on earth you wish to make it into a game balance vs game design debate eludes me nor does it interest or concern me.

You chose to reply to my post with your typical off topic ramblings, I didn't start this conversation you did and from what i can tell your purely being either contrarian or deliberately annoying for attention sake. The comment I made that you decided to get involved with was about BB vs SS compared to DD vs SS nothing to do with BB vs BB, and a issue that is very much about balancing. You could if you wish raise your concerns about WGs design decisions regarding Battleships but this is not really the appropriate thread and also of no interest with me so don't waste my time with it, as I'm not interested.

I wish, I think those islands are just to irresistible for them

Are you just deliberately attention seeking? Of course its an aspect of game design all games have different designs this comparison adds nothing to the discussion because its utterly irrelevant and is quite clearly a deliberate waste of time this game isnt Steel Ocean, we are within the confines of WOWS.

One up side for me is I’m able to grind out that abomination the USS Kansas in this mode, the only weird thing is I seem to be always going much faster than the rest of my team.

It is annoying that WG hide so many things behind loot boxes, where as I’m happy to directly buy things I completely agree with your thinking not to waste money on gambling.

Given WGs track record that's hardly surprising is it. Also this game isn't Steel Ocean, WG have different priorities and its pointless to compare to two games nor helpful given Steel Ocean failed.

Its best not to try and rationalise the “logic” behind WGs decisions it’s purely a game balance decision.

Their stubbornness is only matched by their ineptitude when it comes to shoving submarines into the game. Still it’s clearly a great use of the map building teams resources we get the surprise mechanics of random shallows.

It will be interesting to see how the latest changes affect submarine interaction. Whilst WG still seem to be lurching around uncertain of what they want the finished product to be, at least they are beginning to grasp that the way they have designed this game it’s necessary to give all ships some form of ASW. That being said it still bothers me that battleships have the best utility in the ASW department.

So we finally hit 10,000 comments in this thread and whilst still a way to go to match certain previous threads it’s nice to see the core issues remain hotly debated. Im sure WG have a good laugh at our expense that so much effort and even some good suggestions get posted here to be left in the dustbin of opinions.

This has very much been my experience even to the point of seeing battleship players hiding behind the transports so the convoy eat the torps rather than said BB player. The stupid thing is WG even created an achievement for taking torps when protecting a transport, to try and give people a hint they are protecting the transports not the other way around.

I can see there is still a very long way to go with this egregious submarine project. Over all this is a fairly big buff for submarines, but at long last WG have realised due to the way this game is designed all ships need some kind of ASW but it is weird that BBs are the best equipped in that regard. Give it 2 -3 years maybe this project will actually begin to look balanced.. maybe.

Well we know WG don’t play the game that’s why that whole Turry incident happened, this poor effort to make a light hearted video just adds to the impression they really don’t have a clue.

Im actually enjoying it, I still don't understand why despite all the feedback given (because of course WG always take feedback onboard) why the transport route is shown to the attacking team. Still for fast paced aggressive gameplay its fun for me at least, for more passive campy BB players though it must all be very confusing why they keep loosing.

Thank you

Sounds like a good idea, so sadly almost certain not to happen.