Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

lovelacebeer

Players
  • Content Сount

    4,158
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    25223
  • Clan

    [R7S]

Everything posted by lovelacebeer

  1. lovelacebeer

    Kitakami Time?

    Honestly it surprises me WG have not just sold her as a premium simply as a quick cash grab. Given all the other ridiculous things that have been developed of late I can’t see the kitakami being any worse than what’s gone before it.
  2. lovelacebeer

    Karma - why it’s pointless

    I try not to bother noticing my karma after all why worry about something that has no value. However I have noticed a lot of volatility in compliments and reports recently just from seeing the notifications appearing when in port. Weirdly I usually get compliments when I’m the best player in a loss where as I’m very likely to get reported if I’m the best player on the winning team.
  3. Honestly I think they just saw that WarThunder have Canberra’s with tactical nukes and decided they want some of that for us over here in WOWS. Mind you give them time we might well end up with a Malta class CV with either Vulcans or Victors. It’s just a pity as the Brits did actually have some beautiful carrier based jet planes, but this is WG why would they bother putting any effort into their latest bright idea.
  4. lovelacebeer

    New Codes.

    Thank you
  5. lovelacebeer

    Super Container Loot Thread [ topics merged ]

    Cant complain, doubloons are always useful.
  6. Out of curiosity why on earth is the Canberra bomber a land based aircraft put on HMS Eagle? Especially when there were so many jets used by the Fleet Air Arm to choose from.
  7. lovelacebeer

    Petition: Petropavlovsk needs LONGFIRE_BIGFLOOD

    It certainly seems a reasonable idea to look into.
  8. lovelacebeer

    General Submarines related discussions

    If we are lucky it’s because they are going to actually put some effort in Submarines this time and make the gameplay interesting as the submarine. Mind you I might well be being overly optimistic but then I love good submarine games.
  9. Although I still believe subs are a worse addition than super ships, it’s all part of WG desperately scrabbling around for ideas but lacking the foresight to actually implement any of this well. Still who knows maybe mid tiers will be a good hiding place for a while…
  10. lovelacebeer

    T5 brawls: what ships to play?

    I don’t tend to do brawls but I will be curious to hear if the Kami sisters are reigning supreme. They are beautifully evil but so much fun.
  11. lovelacebeer

    Gin court in the shop

    In the armoury in game, go to featured and scroll down to the bottom, there are 2 options the admiral and normal packages. You won’t find her in the usual ships tab.
  12. lovelacebeer

    Gin court in the shop

    Your quite right I had completely forgotten about that.
  13. lovelacebeer

    WG promoting Operations again?????

    Don’t remind me I really miss wandering around Ueno park in April enjoying the blossom. I also miss that Operation but I have more expectation in travelling.
  14. lovelacebeer

    Gin court in the shop

    Well I’m not intending to buy any new ones so I’m left using up the old ones. On the issue of old/ new currency it always causes some confusion when I ask for “New Taiwan Dollars” as that’s the official name of the currency despite it being in circulation since ‘49.
  15. lovelacebeer

    Gin court in the shop

    Awesome news, I will certainly get her using up my old doubloons
  16. lovelacebeer

    What Were Your Greatest Gaming Achievements Today ?

    Im just happy I got the will to win medal
  17. lovelacebeer

    What's the logic around BBs Airstrike range??

    It’s just another aspect of the exceedingly poorly thought though sub project where WG are just scrabbling around blindly.
  18. lovelacebeer

    Suggestions thread

    It really bothers me too it’s almost like they are just copying War Thunder by adding the Canberra
  19. lovelacebeer

    Proposal for a new Operation

    Thank you, I know it’s highly unlikely but I can live in hope.
  20. lovelacebeer

    Proposal for a new Operation

    Now I know Operations are clearly not a priority for WG at this time and I'm probably being ridiculously optimistic even suggesting the idea of new operations when we are still missing so many old ones, but it never hurts to remind WG there is interest in Operations and who knows it might actually be easier to make a new one that update the old ones. So here goes my (and I admit I'm clearly not cut out for this) attempt at a Operation, please feel free to suggest improvements or considering how many of you are far better gamers than me alternative ideas for Operations. Like I said this is more trying to drum up interest in Operations. Operation Tealeaf: Going back to the idea of Allies vs Axis Operations this would be an Allied Operation, ideally tier 8 but not set in stone. The team is tasked with escorting a couple of transports carrying Commandos on a raid to steal the enemy technology, along with a couple of secondary missions of kill the transports and destroy the enemy ship undergoing repairs. 1. The battle starts with (the Black Triangle) attacking a defending force of tier 5 and 6 Destroyers plus a light cruiser (denoted by the Red Circle), The team travel in a North East direction and then must pass and disable the enemy costal forts (Red Triangles) heading towards the Objective (Red Star). 2. As the Task Force approaches the enemy base they encounter a force of E boats (S boots for our German friends) like in Operation Dynamo, supported by some cruisers and 2 lower tier battleships Bayerns probably. As this takes place The Purple Arrow denotes a few enemy transports fleeing the scene, destroy the transports for a secondary task, also destroy the port facilities the transports departed from (Red Pentagons). 3. The allied Bot transports have now completed their raid on the base and the team departs to the West. Two more forts require being disabled and a Final assault of enemy ships attack from the North, Personally I prefer that the final Battle takes place in Open Water but I know most people in game prefer Islands so I have provided 2 alternative points the final attack could come from. The Small Red Star is for a disabled Graf Zeppelin CV which cannot move but has Secondary's working, bonus objective for destroying her. Mission fails if Both bot transports carrying the stolen technology are destroyed before reaching the exit point. Rewards would be the same as standard Operations no point being greedy. I provide my admittedly appalling efforts at using Paint to try and help visualize what the Operation would look like below:
  21. lovelacebeer

    Proposal for a new Operation

    At least on a ship made of ice it would more sense for this one not to catch fire easily.
  22. lovelacebeer

    WG trying to sell some "detonation" flags

    Nothings changed as far as I’m aware on a stats front, sadly I fear RNGenus just has it out for you today. Although good grief that’s very bad luck.
  23. lovelacebeer

    WAIT! DON'T JUMP!

    What an evil thing to do, who in their right mind would encourage a friend to join this game anymore.
  24. lovelacebeer

    Closed test 0.11.1, new ships (DB 262)

    Sadly I’m not surprised given WGs obsession with CVs and I have nothing really to add on that debate as it’s all been said and WG will ignore us. Still it really bugs me they put the Canberra on HMS Eagle, the Canberra is a land based bomber is it really too hard to either put the De Haviland Vampire (the first jet plane to land and take off on a carrier) or the Sea Vixen which is at least pretty. I might be being unfairly cynical but I do wonder if WG are just trying to copy War Thunder at this point ( and failing).
  25. lovelacebeer

    Super carriers... But no word of getting our AA back...

    Probably the next line of cruisers to come out after the super carriers will have somewhat better AA, but it certainly won’t be especially effective. WG have a real issue AA and I don’t see that changing.
×