Oderisson

Cute. Although seeing as You probably got most of XP by killing other guys planes, makes me think that other guy had an anchor for a brain. Thats one in 100 game. Other 99 are just suffering.

Panowie tu nie chodzi o to żeby się doktoryzować z tematu bo WOWS to nie symulator. Historia jest krótka: Mamy nowy okręt, wszyscy są ciekawi jak będzie się sprawował to szukamy analogii. Wikipedia może jest ogólna ale jakieś pojęcie pozwala mieć w temacie. Podobieństwo bije po oczach. To wystarczy. Nikt od razu historyka marynarki francuskiej nie będzie udawał.

Malutka prośba. Nie wypowiadaj się jak nie masz pojęcia o temacie. Nawet na wikipedii jest cytacik: "Richelieu-class ships were essentially scaled-up versions of the preceding Dunkerque class ". Jeżeli ktoś lubi tylko psioczyć nie mając pojęcia w temacie to pieprznie coś takiego. Inni się rozejrzą w literaturze żeby mieć choć mgliste pojęcie.

Chodzi mi że okręty maja słabe i mocne strony. Jeden jest dobry w jednej taktyce a inny w drugiej. Np Dunkierka skoro taka podobna do Richeliu. Frontalnie jeden pieron. Ma tankować frontem i sie wycofywać. Ale fuso s tego samego tieru zdejmie ją jedną salwą z full hp jak dostanie burtę. Ponieważ cytadela jest dość wysoko. Pewnie Richelieu będzie taki sam. Na poziomie 8 nic nie ma wysokiej cytadeli. North carolina kiedyś miała ale się to zmieniło. Więc dajemy Richeliu wysoką cytadelę i po problemie. Nie do ubicia od frontu a z boku pada jak kawka. Jak Yamato. Yamato ma OP działa i nic go nie przebija od frontu. A ma wysoką cytadelę. Jako jedyny BB na tierze X. Pancerniki różnią się miedzy sobą jak klasy okrętów. Kamień papier nożyce. Żaden nie jest niepokonany.

Asymetryczny gameplay. Jedna taktyka, która dzięki nadmiarowi he przechodzi do lamusa nie czyni z okrętu op. Dunkierka też dziobuje 8 działami a w statystykach rewelacji nie ma. Nawet jako premka jest tańsza od reszty. AP odbija pięknie a i pali się nieźle. Albo skompensują pancerzem bocznym i bedzie oneszhot z burty

Radziecka to szczerze nie wiem czy powinna być. No bo jak tu robić dosłownie całą linię papierową. Dosłownie wszystko co ruskie mieli to już jest w grze. Brakuje jednego typu okrętów który notabene żaden nie został ukończony. A reszta drednoty. Do IV tieru ujdzie ale potem fantastyka.

Sory wielkie ale nie o to chodzi żeby okręty były wszystkie Ctrl-C Ctrl-V. Gra nie może być zbalansowana... Asymetryczny gameplay. O czapajewa ty się nie martw... Mendy trzymaja się na 15 km i będzie go podpalał. I powodzenia w trafieniu tego cholerstwa jak twój pocisk leci dłużej niż jego przestawienie steru. Przerabiałem. A jak czapajew gapa i pod ogniem nie manewruje to jego problem. Mexyk i warspite to tier 6 więc jak chcesz żeby one stawały do walki jak równy z równym to podziwiam poczucie humoru. Będą miały dokładnie takie same szanse jak z Triptizem albo Amagim.

Problem is that CVs are hard to master but rewarding to do so. Look at stats (warships.today) for best players. Top players are usually carrier heavy. Best one on EU has 90% win rate. 90%. Can You imagine that? K/D about 19... It would be easier to just get back to port when You see him on enemy team. Carriers can have massive impact on game when played correctly. Thats why they have been banned from CW. They are extremely unbalanced, situational, and unlike other classes, you use your keyboard like those korean guys on starcraft tournaments, what makes them not for everyone.

XD. My bad. Didnt notice german requirement was added to tier 4 mission. Appreciate the effort You took in visualisation though. Colors and proper spacing... Good job.

Its broken actually. I have got 1867 in my lion. Didn't unlock phase 5.

As far as I can tell british high tier bbs are supposed to be he spaming cruiser bane. They have massive heal to fix fire damage. They have high concealement to prevent fire spammers to shoot at them unless they get into range when they can be shot back. They have low hp, so cit hits are a problem. All british bbs have weaker low side armor,and conquerors armor is 260mm under waterline, and if that gets penetrated you get a citadel. also geting a citadel on conqueror will be difficult for brits because of short fuse. Front citadel is 51mm. Thats virtually paper. Yamato will probably one shot kil conqueror through the bow

I had to take a look at my gneissenau stats when i saw topic name. Win rate 60%(okay-ish, better than my average), avg dmg 69k, k/d2,1. As far its my favourite ship. You justh have to play it as a brawler. You have to few guns to fire a salvo and hope to hit massive score, You need to get close and personal. Oh and torps. Cruisers tend to rush you less, if they know you will be taking them with you.

Ever heard of LTE? Quite popular these days... I get a stable 10 Mbit/s and ping 35 on mobile internet provider.

Exactly my point. The problem is on my end. But the problem is not my internet but my PC. Its quite old (over 7 years) but still powerfull enough to play WoWs at 60 fps. Probably the game is not optimalised for older PCs but WG doesnt care, because the people who atre having problems is not enough. But i dont play enough to buy a new PC to play a free to play game (on which i would only ocasionally spend some cash, but very little), when it will be ONLY game which I will actually have time to play.

Try writing a ticket... Or ill just save you the trouble: "Please contact your ISP because we dont care. Sincerely, Wargaming"

Probably its because its not the server issue but just a bug. WG states that this is a problem with connection. Wrote a ticket, sent pinglogger and got reply "[edited]You, contact your service provider". The problem is that i have acces to 3 internet providers, one mine, one my neighbour and one on mobile internet. and everywhere i get disconnected. It get worse the more PC is n so i am guessing its memory leak or something along the lines. Not everyone has issues, so its probably some equipment incompatibility. Pitty, that WG choses to ignore the problem.

Yeah, I reported issue... I got reply that its my connection and i should contact internet provider. Well, apparently the fact that i am getting same results on one stationary and two mobile internet providers arent important. The iportant part is that the ticket got closed. It wasnt fixed? Too bad to be me.

So, is the issue been somehow secretly resolved? Checked, and still cant play getting 2-3 disconnects per match (probably would get more but by that time usually somebody decides to put a whole torpedo salvo into me soo... ) Checked the forum and all i could find were discontinued threads. This is not the network issue, of that i am certain, so was there any solution to this?

I have simmilar problem. This issue is floating around since beginning, and receiving a big and juicy "[edited], I DONT CARE" from WG.

The problem is not the wipe but open beta... How many guys were in closed beta? I am guessing not many. Now the servers are open to everyone and they just cant keep up. It looks to me as wg forgot that when you increase user number you need to increase server capacity. This is basicaly giant stress test but done very wrong. You stress test servers when you are not sure if they hold. Now they are just stesting players patience.

Dont bother with pingplotter. It doesnt show crap... I have same problems and pingploter shows 70 max ping and no packet loss. The game is not finished. Thats the only problem right now. remember that it is open beta. They release unplayable version of the game and enable you to pay for testing it by buying doublons and premium ships. Something like early acces. Dont expect much. Also dont bother sending reports to WG. With the number of threads about this problem they are either completely blind, or just dont care. Personaly I would like to believe its the former.

At the current stage the game is unplayable for many. Long story short they state that it is open beta so you cant complain that the game is half finished. Of course that doesnt mean they wont take your money for gold and ships.

Seriously somebody needs to do something abouth this crap. This game is unplayable for many of us. In case anybody just tuned in, I am talking about disconnects and over 60 seconds of game freeze which usually end with me recieving a full torpedo salvo to the side. A well common bug many times discussed on this forum, but apparently not interesting enough for wargaming to actually do something about it SOMEBODY DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS.

Yesterday I have had a pretty uneventful play. Almost 4 hours without any problems. Unfortunately today they have started again. Since mtm apparently isn't going to let go pinglogger suggestion die as it should in the beginning I have actually checked it out. Guess what? It didnt show crap. My game is half frozen (at least the ships are) and my pings to all 12 servers are below 40. No data pocket loss, No nothing.

This problem is actually experienced by quite a few people. There are even some videos on youtube exactly showing the problem. Also i have to agree with you. My PC is actually quite old, although still decent. The technology may be a problem. Thats why I am saying that WG should collect info about Hardware if issue experiencing people. This is a free to play game. Getting as many players as possible is their goal. Their main goal. Better chances of finding people who will spend money on it. Thank you for suggestion but no. WOT is kinda too fast paced for me. I have played it a bit, but my hopes were with WOW all the time.