Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

fallenkezef

Players
  • Content Сount

    1,788
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    1954
  • Clan

    [BRITS]

Everything posted by fallenkezef

  1. fallenkezef

    How many 19 points captains do you have?

    Oh I agree, only reason I have a 19 is the flags from the top Hood bundle (the reason I bought it in the firstplace).
  2. fallenkezef

    Hidden stats?

    This is why I have no respect for stats, you check these guy's figures and their stats are almost always padded by OP ships. When I see a guy with a 60% win rate in an Emerald then I will hang on every word he says. Take my stats, I'm sitting on 44% which is not so good but my Belfast stats are 54%. Does this mean my opinion on Cruisers is worth more than someone with less stats than me? Nonesense Also people are conveniantly stearing the argument away from the point. What pisses me off is not people saying their stats are higher so their opinion is more important (which is still arrogant crap), it's people saying their stats are higher so anybody with less stats is not entitled to an opinion.
  3. fallenkezef

    How many 19 points captains do you have?

    To be honest 10 points is all you really need. I have a 10 in my Black Swan, 14 in my Minotaur, 10 in my Bismark, 19 in my Belfast and a floating 10 that I havn't got a ship for yet, saving him for RN BBs. It was my Leander skipper but I sold my cruisers to buy the Minotaur and building up my credits. I was going to rebuy several CLs but the plan now is to just grind my Warspite and Belfast for silver in prepartaion for the RN BBs
  4. fallenkezef

    How many 19 points captains do you have?

    yay! I have one in my Belfast
  5. fallenkezef

    USS ENTERPRISE (BIG E) - DO NOT MESS IT UP WG

    Oh, so it's about fantasy? Like the German navy? Ok, got it.
  6. fallenkezef

    USS ENTERPRISE (BIG E) - DO NOT MESS IT UP WG

    But Enterprise was nothing special, I don't get it. Don';t get me wrong, she has a great history but was no different from any of the other Yorktowns in how she was built and the air wing she carried.
  7. fallenkezef

    The question remains: who built the best cruisers?

    British tanks
  8. fallenkezef

    So, Big E is Here!

    I think I'll enjoy playing my Minotaur that little bit more when the Enterprise arrives.
  9. fallenkezef

    Hidden stats?

    Actualy no. Historical facts are very different from subjective opinion.
  10. fallenkezef

    USS ENTERPRISE (BIG E) - DO NOT MESS IT UP WG

    Malta was one of the most strategic locations in the Med, the other was Gibraltar. From Malta Britain had overwatch over the centre of the med, a base of operations to attack axis shipping and a location that the axis HAD to neutralise (yet failed to do so) so drew in resources that the axis needed elsewhere.
  11. fallenkezef

    British battleships incoming

    We need more of you
  12. fallenkezef

    USS ENTERPRISE (BIG E) - DO NOT MESS IT UP WG

    You are trolling, please tell me you are trolling and this is not one of the single most ignorant comments regarding WW2 history I have ever read?
  13. fallenkezef

    USS ENTERPRISE (BIG E) - DO NOT MESS IT UP WG

    RN CVs where also highly effective in the Pacific. American crews where envious of the seeming invulnerability of RN CVs to kamikaze attacks.
  14. fallenkezef

    British battleships incoming

    I was hoping they would follow the theme of Warspite and Hood and give British guns below average range.
  15. fallenkezef

    Hidden stats?

    AgarwaenME, on 10 June 2017 - 07:47 PM, said: And here's the problem with "opinions" like this. What you're saying is patently false, and you ignore the explanation and just repeat the same line over and over against all evidence and explanations. So just like with stats, you want people to just read what you say, no matter how provably false, and treat it as true just because it's your "opinion". Which goes back to my initial quote, such opinions are worthless. "such opinions are worthless" There is your problem right there. MasaruKondera, on 20 January 2016 - 11:41 AM, said: You can turn them off actually Just go on the World of Warships webiste, click on players and then you see the profile privacy. Click on the eye and you can selevt your visibillity. I did that, was literaly slagged off in EVERY thread I posted in till I switched them on.
  16. fallenkezef

    Hidden stats?

    Yest there are no legions of British fanboys whining on this forum about the new BBs. All the comments have been rational and reasonable. Just like your constant whine posts about fanvoys and the Hood, it's all fictional.
  17. fallenkezef

    Hidden stats?

    That bs is exactly what I am talking about
  18. fallenkezef

    Hidden stats?

    I hate it when people ise stars to deny others an opinion. Everyone is entitled to an opinion whether we agree or bot. It's like when exovet goes on about fanboys, he is wrong but I respect his right to state an opinion
  19. fallenkezef

    British battleships incoming

    What is Uamato's range for comparison?
  20. fallenkezef

    British battleships incoming

    Renown was a true beauty
  21. fallenkezef

    Advice on mid tier BB play

    I can relate to this. I lije RN CLs, do ok in them especialy Belfast but I just love Warspite. Even though I suck and end up to far forard. I need to settle down and lesrn BBs properly
  22. fallenkezef

    Smoke screen + AA

    The AI bots in the new co-op missions have more balls than bbsbies
  23. fallenkezef

    PVE Scenarios (S1): Which ships for which missions?

    I have been messing about with my secondary build Warspite and it seems to work. The secondaries frag the DDs up close
  24. fallenkezef

    British battleships incoming

    Aue me too, love the old WW1 battlewagons
  25. fallenkezef

    British battleships incoming

    Hopefully we'll have some low tier "keepers" now. None of the RN criisers under T6 are worth keeping
×