kfa

I will play my AS Saipan just to piss people off

The best cruisers in the game are the russian DDs.

I will be playing more CVs to counter them because i find them boring. They are just US DDs with slightly tweaked torps i am sure as hell wont be spending any free xp on that.

Its completely pointless, its easy to get clear sky with the "strike" loadout with only 2 of those broken fighter squads. As i am playing mine theese days, im starting to beleive that not the Blefast is the most broken T7 ship.

2 days ago happened a 10v10 at 5PM and a 5v5 at 10AM... I still play carriers bro, hold on until the year of carriers comes in 2017!!

He is right you know, i thought you are trolling as well. Panasian dds look crap and boring, they will be busy fighting russian gunboats, evading us smoketorps or running away from german hydroDDs... And WHEN all enemy DDs are defeated maybe you will be able to torp some BBs. I will skip the line and play even more carriers :P

I voted for no, cause i play mainly T10, and i like the fire resistance against lower plebs and i dont want my ships to be nerfed.

Its still in the game, played on it twice recently. I think its T9-T10 matchmaking only now, but i remember one of my best Murmansk game (25 fires) was on this map :D

8 barreled shotgun. The accuracy looks horrible.

Exactly. With a healthy amount of CVs, there would be far less BB/DD and cruisers would be once again useful instead of hiding behind islands at 18km as it is now.

So you say the statistics wont be accurate cause a lot fewer players play the tiers with the horrible matchmaking? Whoa what a surprise that T7 and T8 are far more popular than the cannonfodder tiers of tier5 and 6.

No way i am going to suffer through 50 T6 matches. As i wrote before, one of my fav ships were the Warspite and the Murmansk and i dont play them anymore because of the horrible MM. If you tell me otherwise, prove it yourself. It should be 33% top tier, 33% T5-T7 and 33% bottom tier. It wont be.

i am not interested in playing against bots, nor the majority of the playerbase Please play T6 in randoms and make a statistic how many times are you top tier, or bottom tier, lets say from 50 games sample size

Once upon a time when Zao had the 20km Shima torps and the Kitakami was in the game as well as the 5 Torp squadron Hakuryuu? Yeah those were the fun times.

1. Alright the HE battleships are a bit stupid design, but it gets boring. I have the Conqueror but i prefer playing my Bismarck or Yamato, because they are more fun (although inferior to the RN counterparts). 2. Smoke meta is the thing of the past, i heard clans are thinking about topedo boosters instead of smokes. BBs cant hide in it anymore, CA staying still in it is a huge risk and DDs cant realy do meaningful damage from a smoke. I am not afraid of the Panasian pewpew from smoke... 3. I literally never heard anyone stating IJN torps/DDs are overpowered. (apart from 300 battles noobs in Derpitz) 4. I will pay you 500$ if play your Panasian DDs with radar and you get more winrate as any other of your DDs of the same tier.... They are exactly the same as radar Minotaur. Fun for 2 games maybe, then switch back to smoke.

Best ships currently in the shop Kaga Loyang Tirpitz Atago Saipan Scharnhorst Do not buy t5 or t6, they have a horribe matchmaking. 2 of my favourite ships were the Warspite and the Murmansk but i dont play them anymore cause WG decided to cater the lowtier sealclubbers and newbies and its worth ruining 2 important tiers.

Beta Midway was OP as hell, everybody knows. No wonder you enjoyed it. The state of the US CVs since their nerf is horrible, but so is any other CVs' state, but the US ones will be rebalanced next patch. Lets hope for the best, my Midway is collecting dust as well.

Alright, so i pretty much stopped at the Fletcher like almost everybody else, because the Fletcher has better range on the guns, arguably better torps (in regards of reaction time), a lot better maneuverability, better camo and to top all of that it is Tier9, a bit softer matchmaking. To gain 1 more pewpew, you have to accept that the ship as a whole is worse. Okay lets accept it, i like my Fletcher, move on to the next line, lets try the Shimakaze. I am currently at the Yugumo, its an excellent boat but here comes my second shock: it is also superior in almost all ways to the Tier10. Yugumo has better guns (rof, dispersion and range), a better maneuverability, better camo and it can launch 16 torps with the booster instead of 15. After all this, i have only 1 question left:

Strongest class or most influential class? Its not the same. Strongest class (not according to my stats but according to my feelings): DDs, cause capturing areas and spotting wins games, not the 20km random citadels. Most influential: Carriers of course, if i have a bad day or i get papedipupi as an opposing CV my team will definetly lose, but if everything goes as planned, we win.

No it's not. Khaba is faster, stronger, scooter.

Why do i have to be a 1000 game shimakaze/gearing pro to read the numbers on the wiki page? What is that logic? Or you are not allowed to have an opinion for example on war matters unless you served in the army? I just dont understand why does the tier9 destroyers have to be more nimble and have better camo than the tier10s (plus the many other advantages)?

the Tier10 ships have 10k avg damage more but have less winrate. wow thats a quality 20M upgrade

And thats why a blew all my free xp on a new ship line. I was saving for quite a long time but i have no interest in the Missouri/Nelson and although one of my favourite ships is the Yamato, i dont see the point either in a nerfed tier9 version.

Division up with a CV player like i do.

Yes but still, if you want the strongest AA DD in game you still go for the Grozovoi ( and i mean a lot stronger, +25% DPS from the module and the Grozovoi can easily get away with manual AA (instead of concealment) as well cause it has useful guns and workable 10km torps)