Jump to content

elblancogringo

Players
  • Content Сount

    1,207
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    7342
  • Clan

    [-FF-]

About elblancogringo

Recent Profile Visitors

1,845 profile views
  1. I show respect to people who respect me. But clearly you are not one of them. So I'll be blunt. You yourself have played superships yet you dare question the fact I have fun with them. In addition, the battles you win while playing them are approximately 1 out of 5, so why do you even bother answering and criticizing me? You probably do not think they are OP, right? Why is it wrong for me to play a few battles with a supership from time to time?
  2. elblancogringo

    Ramming: what happened here?

    Nagato was sailing away from Caracciolo, visible on screenshot 2, therefore decreasing the ram damage
  3. That's some bull here if I know it. I have Conde and Zorkiy, they both are very fun to play, the latter especially as I love gunboats and this one is close to the pre-nerf Khabarovsk. Now tell me, is it wrong for me to enjoy playing them? Show some respect.
  4. Good day, I have a ton of small economic bonuses, for ship experience. I wanted to combine them into bigger bonuses. Looks like I cannot. It is possible to do the opposite though, you can for example trade 1 800% bonus for 4 200% bonuses in the inventory. Why combining small bonuses is not an option? Please add this option too WG.
  5. elblancogringo

    Steel to play Superships

    Well, my 2 favorite ships now are the Conde and the Zorkiy. A decent game means no credit loss, so I welcome all missions rewarding us for playing superships. If I need credits I can always play a few games with a premium from time to time.
  6. Good day, I recently started using Malwarebytes and it detects and blocks countless potential threats, all coming from the Wargaming Game Center, which I use to launch World of Warships. Until today, it was only blocking access to some suspicious websites like these: But today, for the first time, after installing the new update I got a virus scan report which quarantined a malicious object found once again in the game center directory. The name is MONITOR_CLIENT_IMPL.DLL: Can anybody tell me what the hell is going on? Is the game unsafe? Can someone provide explanations as to why the Game Center constantly tries to connect to IP addresses that are referenced as malicious? The most infuriating thing is that it can happen even when the Game Center is not running, meaning it can make it happen in the background constantly. I am considering uninstalling everything. I'd like to know if someone from Wargaming could give me a satisfying explanation. Regards
  7. Even if it was true, WG need to accumulate enough data for a year or two before "balancing" anything. And btw I don't recall them buffing the accuracy of a ship after its release. Nerfing it, yes, but buffing a BB accuracy? I think they never did it. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think you can forget about it. Like any balancing suggestion to WG devs, to be honest. Anyway, "thank you for your feedback, we really care about the community's opinion"
  8. Indeed, everyone know that secondary siegfried was a meme build. But definitely a funny one. I bought Siegfried for this, knowing it was not optimal, but for the fun. Now we have another long range sniper, and like OP said there are other ships to fulfill that role already. It's still a range nerf compared to before 0.10.0 and why having long range anyway? Acccuracy is so bad now that your secondaries won't hit anything. Siegfried is not fun anymore.
  9. elblancogringo

    Napoli, WHAT IS THIS WG??

    If they give that ship improved secondary dispersion while still letting Siegfried with shitty dispersion and unusable secondaries that would be really taking us Siegfried owners for fools. I don't want that Italian cruiser, I want Siegfried back. But I must say that developing a secondary cruiser after this awful captain rework is just plain stoopid
  10. The range buff imo does not save secondaries builds from that awful dispersion that high tier secondaries now have. There might be some ships, like Amagi or Kii that have better secondaries than before, but something better than absolute crap is not necessarily good. I used to play these builds because of the fun and also the deterrence to yolo'ing DDs, among other reasons. It's not fun now it's frustrating as they hit nothing, and if your hit ratio is so bad, how can you still be a deterrence to rushing DDs? Secondaries suck now, but does it affect WG money earnings? No. Will they buff them? Probably not.
  11. elblancogringo

    When will manual secondary get a buff?

    I would certainly not judge a battleship player by his survival rate. But if you do, that's fine, it just proves my point on how clueless you are. Did you even consider that skill is not only aiming your gun in this game? Once again, you just prove my point. Please carry on.
  12. elblancogringo

    When will manual secondary get a buff?

    His opinion about positioning and knowing when to push to efficiently use secondaries is valid. It's way more than using AI only like you say. But at least we know the reason behind your clan name. You're so nice in how you say things.
  13. elblancogringo

    The end of Flint

    Oh but I certainly think it would be needed to tell wargaming the spreadsheet is no justification. That was actually something interesting. How can you be sure they know it? After all, don't they keep analyzing data forever? Isn't it one of their favourite justification? No need to look far away, this thread has the answer...
  14. elblancogringo

    The end of Flint

    Yeah sure. Tell this to wargaming balance team.
  15. elblancogringo

    When will manual secondary get a buff?

    They will need to analyze data for 6 months before giving a 2% buff to accuracy probably. But it's ok, because the rework added many different options of gameplay... oh wait...
×