steviln

I do however see in the chat. I have seem people complain about BB heavy match one time, while I constantly see people complain when there is a CV ingame and especially if there is a match with more DDs than usual.

But the playerbase IS split. A lot of the people think that you can tell the BBabies to sod off and still be fine, but I think that they would lose to much of the playerbase if they did that. And it is propably the reason they have done no serious attempt to reduce BB population.

However, it seems that you are unable to consider anything by pure numbers? Seems you would make a good engineer but a horrible social scientist.

But I am frustrated that they will not see that their playerbase is split, and regardless of what they do they may drive one of them away from the game. They should consider different game modes in my opinion. Seperate the "gamers" from the "history buff nerds".

Yes, but it is fine so long as they stay in their current state where few bother to play them.

No, but a game with BB could still be closer to WT than what WOWs is and still be viable as a game. Still better than the CV mechanics. I would still prefer something like Great Naval Battles where you had to direct the damage control parties to which damage to fix.

Why would that not been viable? The main War Thunder game is. No, but the CV mechanic is the most cartoonish part of the game. I did not say that it would realistic as such, just more like the real thing than how CVs work now.

They made it that way so it would fit in with their air game.

I still prefer that, because WT realistic battles just in ground forces and planes give me the feeling I like. Feel more like a battle. I would really have preferred if Gajin had made a naval game with capital ships. It is simply that with a BB heavy meta and few CVs, this game is closer to what I want, while the CVs make it more like any generic shooter.

Would it? I think that realistic battles in War Thunder are very playable.

I did see a guy with mtm78s avatar commenting Sargon of Akkad Youtube videos. Sure that was him.

To answer the question why I whine. Since so many players whined about to many BBs and the need for more CVs so cull them, I "counterwhine" so WG should see that some people actually disagree with them. I would not whine about to many CVs if nobody had whined there are to few CVs.

And I would like this game if people who whine about feminists and muslims would bugger off somewhere else.

Or you do not like whiners that whine about something else than evil feminists and muslims?

Yes, it seems that many people hate people who play the game and actually have an interest in naval warfare.

Then I simply play War Thunder instead. And guess quite a few players will leave then, since many of the BBabies will not find this game as enjoyable with more CVs. However, neither the Enterprise or Kaga have flooded the game yet. Would actually have liked to buy the Enterprise myself, but does not do it since I fear the rest of the team will track down my real identity and kill me if I play high tier CVs :)

The thing is that the nerfs have made CVs so rare that is is bearable.

It was you guys who started to focus on the person. Just as that @mtm78 guy that always comments on the stats of the person and not the arguments.Edited. This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inflammatory remarks.

You refused to specify why I was hypocritical?

It seems you are more eager to avoid answering than actually answering?

So what is the relevance then? Why is it bad to dislike the mechanics of one class in the game?

Can you link to the post where I claim I want the IJN dds nerfed?

How is that hypocritical?

Actually, since the CVs are rather rare, a BB player will struggle much more with stealth torping and HE spam that carrier planes.

A player with to many games in CV