Jump to content

steviln

Players
  • Content Сount

    898
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    15672
  • Clan

    [D_R_M]

About steviln

  • Rank
    Officer Cadet
  • Insignia

Recent Profile Visitors

539 profile views
  1. *Edited* This post has been removed due to non-constructive and inappropriate remarks
  2. steviln

    Over-nerfed CVs

    I really think they should rather have made different game modes from the start. In my opinion carrier battles and surface battles does not fit the same game. I prefer the way they have done it in tactical board wargames where surface actions and carrier battles are the theme of different games with quite different scales.
  3. steviln

    Over-nerfed CVs

    The problem though, is that a large portion of the playerbase prefer the game without CVs...
  4. steviln

    Over-nerfed CVs

    You know, there are people that care about other things than pure winrate. Or are you able to understand anything else but numbers? It seems that most betatesters have a mindset like that.
  5. steviln

    Over-nerfed CVs

    The things is that when you are sunk, you lose the possibilty to score EXP and credits, and also get less fun out of the match.
  6. steviln

    Over-nerfed CVs

    But a ship affect the battle even with their presence. As long as an enemy CV is afloat, the team have to adapt. When all DDS or BBs are sunk, the enemy team can change their play accordinly. The inabiltiy to remove them make the CVs more annoying since they are there all the time and can reach over the entire map in a way other ships cannot.
  7. steviln

    Over-nerfed CVs

    I just pointed to the stereotypes. I do not understand why people like you deny the obvous fact that different parts of the playerbase want this game to be completely different things?
  8. steviln

    Over-nerfed CVs

    But getting sunk early and getting a bad result to a large degree is the same thing.
  9. steviln

    Over-nerfed CVs

    Why is that though? For me it is simple. I prefer this game without CVs rather than War Thunder, but prefer War Thunder to this game with CVs. When it comes to this question, I really think WG should seperate the playerbase into two. It is obvious for me that two distinct groups play this game that want totally different things from it. Why not let the "true gamers" have fun in fast games with CVs while the middle aged guys who just want to relax a bit can have their own game mode farming each others BBs? I really think this game is a mess because WG does buffs and nerfs to satisfy these groups every other time, while they never going to make everyone satisfied regardless.
  10. steviln

    Over-nerfed CVs

    As I see it, as long as anyone play CVs, they are not nerfed enough. The one thing that made me play this game so much the last couple of years is exactly that CVs were rare. And if they become common again, I will simply only play this game when game modes are available without CVs.
  11. steviln

    Select battle mode -- CV or no CV

    Maybe a couple of years ago, but not for quite some time now.
  12. steviln

    Select battle mode -- CV or no CV

    (edited)
  13. steviln

    Select battle mode -- CV or no CV

    I simply point to the fact that CV main players are also bad people.
  14. steviln

    Select battle mode -- CV or no CV

    Yes, you are just butthurt because many other players have no interest in being XP pinatas for your CV. CV players seems like sosiopath cowards that just love to deal out damage to other while being in no real danger themselves?
  15. steviln

    RTS CVs. Do you miss us now?

    What is wrong with being a CV hater?
×