Jump to content

thunder3oo

Players
  • Content Сount

    193
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    21461
  • Clan

    [SICA]

About thunder3oo

  • Rank
    Petty Officer
  • Birthday 03/16/1974
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

520 profile views
  1. You described the situation very well, @matia251. World Of Warships, Wargaming, pay attention to his words. Cause if you don't, you'll end up murdering the game in the same fashion you murdered WoT and WoW'p.
  2. Hello. "we're happy to listen to what aspects you dislike, so we can try to improve that for the future." Actually you don't (I mean the Wargaming company). You seem to be a nice guy, Crysantos, I have no quarrel with you. I'm here since Beta (2015) and I KNOW that Wargaming doesn't listen, of if it does, it's a "I hear only what I want" way of listening. The company you work for lacks the respect for its players. I'm (still) a loyal player because I have invested real, hard worked money and time in this game. While the money can be returned, generally speaking, you can't return to someone the time. Speaking of WoW's - playing in Beta it was a pain in the... a... neck, the lack of optimization, the video settings that were doing what they weren't supposed to, the forum, the false advertising, the premium purchases, the complains, the WG staff treating us like [edited], sending us from one place to another, the official game with tons of bugs + new bugs comings with new patches, and so on... In moments like these I realize how undeveloped is or world/planet in terms of gaming, we have a single online game with warships, which is too arcade and broken. I'm not here because I love the game very much. I'm here because of the lack of choice. The moment I will find a game that fit my needs, made by a company who respects its players, I'm out of here, 21 K battles or not. All the best, thunder3oo
  3. Wargaming, you're desperate to get new players, so desperate that you're capable of paying actual money for that. Distasteful. Low. ... and I am certain that you do that because you're not gonna change your ways, which we know after all these years to be... extremely flawed. You want to keep your way of conducting things while you get more players. From low to even lower... I, for one, I will not recommend this game to any of my friends. Maybe I will speak about it, but in doing so, I will alert them of your practices, so they can know what's to be expected of you, before they get too deep into it, and spend hard worked money on your products.
  4. thunder3oo

    Ranked Battles: the Twelfth Season

    The idea of making T10 rentals available to newcomers is extremely bad, but guess what, I've seen a lot of "yolo" warriors with regular ships in this Ranked season. That was not a surprise for me, since the same type of guys you can find in Random Battles. But to come in Ranked and act like you don't give a sh*t about anyone, go and die (alone) in the first 3-5 minutes, well... The MM is broken - giving you at Ranks 8- 7 the same guys you encountered at ranks 12-10 , the advancing system is extremely flawed (really now, it is so hard to make it more enjoyable, Wargaming?). Beside this, as I underlined before, having CV's and Minotaurs in Ranked is... unspeakable. And today? Today I had a battle with a CV and 2 (!) Minotaurs on each team. I must say I barely restrained myself from breaking something with my bare arms. So, I quit playing Ranked. Enough with this crap. WG, it's clear now that even after 4 years (four!) you don't know what you're doing there. That's why you pushed hard on graphics, special effects, more ships, more colored videos, more animation and pretty girls, and so on... ... because when it comes to gaming, you don't have a god damn clue what that is. You may know how a ship looks, but the game? You don't know how to make it work, really. Because the ideas of the most improvements added to the game belong to us, the players. Wargaming, If you think we're that stupid to loose any more time and credits on something worked so badly as your Ranked Battles, think again. Take all that steel you graciously "offered" us, cut in in tiny-tiny pieces, and shove it up your arse, and maybe in the process of doing it, you'll learn to listen better your players. I can live without that steel, and so can others.
  5. thunder3oo

    Ranked Battles: the Twelfth Season

    This season can be described with a single word: disaster. I'm stuck between rank 8 and 7. I'm amazed of the level of stupidity I see in this season. Players who don't care about the others, who storm (lemming) a side and still loose and so on... So... 1. CV's - We struggle against CV's manually controlled splitting waves of planes with an automatic AA which is a joke and doesn't do the job properly. What is this new crap with splitting squadrons and the reduced AA range? Why the AA control has only left right enforce? Why the time to switch sides is so long? Why not automatic 360 degrees? The person/s who designed this should be fired. Only a few CV players are good. Many of them don't help the team (spot on request, hit specific target), they just have their own agenda, which is doing stars, hit big targets and get fat bonuses, no matter what. Once again, CV players prove to be unscrupulous, the kind of people I personally don't want to deal with. There's a big discrepancy between consumables cool down and the OTHER waves of planes. Rocket planes do too much damage. 2. Rented ships. A rented ship is ok, as long it has upgrades installed (at least some) and is sailed by someone with some experience.That being said, WG made a "China size error" allowing everyone to play ranked with T10 rented ships. Wargaming, this is not Random Battle, where tier 4 is easy to repair, and players don't care about mistakes and other players very much. This is tier 10, another level. Level. Can you read the word? I understand that you want to keep the idea of "fun and engaging" alive, but you KILLED the fun. There's no fun. Nothing "engaging". You made us loose time. Really, the play style of some teams in this season of Ranked is so bad, that when I see it, I run. I run like hell. Really. Trust me, I start running the moment I realize what kind of team MM thrown me into. Players asking "Why don't you push???", which means you sail into De Moines hidden behind an island on the left and a DD hiden in smoke somewhere front-right, which can be a gunboat like Harugumo. And behind the DM who comes? The BB's. The cherry on top is that no one is spotting them. Our DD is already dead or he has other plans. Yeah, let's go blind, die all like fools... Nice people, really... 3. Tier 10. Really, WG? Since you supposed to have some imagination, you should have seen the disaster coming. Then why not allowing a lower tier? 4. Minotaur. Like CV's, they don't belong in Ranked. The idea of Ranked is to sort the best, the most skilled players. There's no skill in hiding in smoke and doing massive damage to ships that don't have a single god damn Hydro or Radar, no skill in shooting continuously from 17-18 km, while the targets are sluggish and their guns have a long reload time, plus they don't have a spotting plane to identify the real spot from which Minotaur shoots, because they're either Conqueror, or they are BB's set with fighters expecting a match with CV's. Bad balancing, bad developing. Period. 5. DD players. Man, these guys... Some of them die like flies, they are that stupid, yes. No skills, no maneuvering, no calculating the enemy moves, NOTHING. How the f... you see a bunch of ships closing - front, left and right, they spot you, and you STILL try to cap? What the... This is NOT Ranked. This is anything but Ranked. There are no skills involved. It's a dirty god damn lottery. Update Wargaming, you're stupid, your developers are stupid, the testers are retarded, even most of your players are stupid. All of you gather in some place and blow up your collective asses, idiots.
  6. thunder3oo

    Update 0.8.4: Soviet Battleships!

    You have more posts than battles, more than that, I have encountered you in the forum lots of times, so Bruecki2938's question is legit.
  7. thunder3oo

    Update 0.8.4: Soviet Battleships!

    Hmm, they look interesting and I would like to see them in action. However, speaking of Russian ships, as far as i know, Russia was the first to have a Naval Academy in the world. So, if my info is good, a solid Russian tech tree is ok to have before other nations.
  8. thunder3oo

    Update 0.8.4: Soviet Battleships!

    You again... I was referring to the number of CV players compared to the number of regular ships players, and I think I was pretty clear about that. Dafuq, can't you read?
  9. thunder3oo

    Update 0.8.4: Soviet Battleships!

    Exactly. You're right, man. Maybe they use the same crap you can see in politics nowadays - people ask for a thing and get the exactly the opposite. I said it before and I say it again: WG supports a minority, an obscure group of people (that needs to grow a pair). The choices we make, even the small ones (like choosing the type of ship in this game) say something about us. My personal opinion is that heavy CV players are unscrupulous people who like to get things in life the easy way, and WG supports them. No matter the age, if you choose to play a CV when EVERYBODY struggles to have fun against CV's (excepts are Wooster and Mino), says something about you, and that's anything but good. We all have seen what Wargaming is capable of - misleading customers into buying faulty products - known as false advertisement (which in some countries is punished by law); selling extremely good (and also poorly tested) products, so they can nerf them afterwards, working on graphics and special effects when they should have worked on gameplay, being extremely aggressive towards competitors and critics (see here), and so on... Wargaming is supporting this kind of people because is formed of this kind of people. So yeah... feedback? What feedback?
  10. thunder3oo

    Update 0.8.4: Soviet Battleships!

    "Thank you", Wargaming, you f**ed up your own game big time. And I mean... BIG TIME. Well, it's my fault that I believed you to be a serious company, who cares about its players/customers and respects them. I have learned a lot from my experience with you, so, after more than 20k battles, I will not spend a single coin on your fraud/falsely advertised products (and I spent a lot since the game was in Beta stage). Time to look for another game made by a company who really respects its players, and end this chapter.
  11. thunder3oo

    Ranked Battles: the Twelfth Season

    Thank you, WG_Lumberjack
  12. thunder3oo

    Ranked Battles: the Twelfth Season

    Very well said, Animalul2012
  13. thunder3oo

    Ranked Battles: the Twelfth Season

    Since you WG guys constantly change the game, ships specs, and now you have CV's back (in the god damn Ranked, wtf)... you should give us the opportunity to reset the captains skills accordingly, ffs. Yeah, can't wait to see those CV snowflakes bragging about "how good&skilled they are", they and their damn splitting squadrons, manually controlled against our shitty automatic AA. Give yourself a raise, will ya?
  14. thunder3oo

    Clan Battles Matchmaking and Balance

    Oh, f*** the NA team, again and again, around the world... Did you think you will embarrass me with that? Think again. Second day of replies, still, you posted no stats/battle results from which I can see you have encountered the same situation and won. You simply cannot make me think you're right, get used to the idea, geniuses.
  15. thunder3oo

    Clan Battles Matchmaking and Balance

    Laugh all you want, I am used to the idea the WG Forum became a circus. There are some many here who replied, and still... there is not a single image or video of you deeds, of your "superior strategy and thinking". Not. A. Single. One. The more you reply without your personal results in a similar situation, the more you make me think I'm right in asking a restriction for the number of destroyers in CB. Facts, people, not words!
×