aboomination

E100 isn't a bad tank, tho.

Iirc ST do have different NDAs than CC, tho. A lot of YouTubers have done this kind of "stat preview" now, especially those from Germany it seems. I guess WG allowed this so that we get hyped a bit more (if possible).

But of course - what else can he do for you, Sir?

Played one game in the Yorck this morning a) received 3 citadels from a New Mexico in the first 2 minutes while hugging my island and feeling quite safe b) defended our carrier a bit so everyone forgot about me c) returned to the action d) defended/capped e) stole 3 kills, doing 20k dmg total f) farmed the enemy CV a bit and got the kill, dealt 40k dmg total by this point g) chat: "worst game in ages but tons of kill stealing on my part" h) ? i) profit! Bottom line: Caps and kills are what super unicorn fairytales are made of

Guess I won the lottery!

Two full-secondary Bismarcks plus a trusty DD as spotter Don't laugh!

For several years WoT looked like poop and was badly optimized. I guess we'll have to wait.

I didn't say that it's a problem - just that it's a nerf and that this should be taken into consideration. Have fun winning, Odo ;)

I don't know about that, the NA will be flinging poop, soon.

NDA lifted? Can't watch atm...

a) Where did I say anything that contradicts this? b) Your point!? Still the new MM is a nerf. c) Yes - and that's why I'm statistically way better at driving the Texas than you are (couldn't resist because of how he proclaimed himself a "smart captain" ).

You plan on playing WoWs like that? As if the AA mattered anywhere else than in port..

Maybe it's because your card has double the memory bit width (not exactly but that's surely an advantage). Also I always felt like I "need" 60+ fps in fps games - otherwise it just looks terrible to me...

Use 16x filtering for better image quality

Looks too blurry, also the 960 is just too weak. I rather enjoy high fps than looking at the rigging in port.

(1) Do you use any mods? If so try deleting everything in your "res_mods\0.5.9.1" folder. (2) If this didn't help or you don't use any mods try

Make the winning team win the lottery! The result will still (and probably more so) be a careful approach by both teams.

Some might say

They said this ship over performed during the test phase. So if it turns out to be too weak after the nerfs in the hands of the masses they certainly know how to buff it a little bit I guess. But then - looking at the Atlanta I don't think you should hold your breath in that case.

That's what I plan to do once my platoon mate returns from vacation It's just that I don't like to play alone atm - it's just that more tactical with someone on Teamspeak But nice to know that I'll probably won't miss AFT that much!

I wouldn't mind a single player/(or optional co-op) PvE mode with rather complex historical campaigns (a lot of sailing, scouting, planning) that could be developed for years and years (these quest packages wouldn't be f2p ofc) and could also provide several difficulty settings with according cosmetical and economic rewards that carry over into pvp to bring in the e-peen factor. The interest in pve seems to be there (40% of played games are pve iirc).

Fair enough. The Flint will be a problem when talking about any Atlanta buffs from now on because most buffs would logically have to be shared between them. RoF buff for the Atlanta? No, because of Flint. Camo buff? No, because of Flint. Speed buff? No, because of Flint... Regarding better DD guns - I have yet to be outgunned by a DD in the Atlanta but of course I would never engage a russian high tier DD above 8-10 km 1v1

Guess you'd have to use japanese tactics as bottom tier