Nibenay78

When most other BBS cover in fear, poor powercrept Montana has to do everything. Twice in a row even :( Best game including 2 afk'ers @YabbaCoe I think Montana is due for a buff soon after all these years!! @BLUB__BLUB @Excavatus Kaga sucks! Montana needs more AA..

..it still not sufficient :D

I think someone said the following at some point... "It doesn't work in the game. There will be no submarines in the game!" Just a pity he probably is right.

Even okay players dont even notice the spot immediately, or even react to it. Not everyone is super-unicum or super-bad. Since we remember RTS, I'd say fire and flooding was rather significant issue back then. It would be now also...

So accounting for everything he has 1973 kill, of which 40% are TK

Bullcrap, I've seen many DDS try to gun down a CV, yet die from incessant rocket spam at point blank. Sometimes they have to dodge incoming fire from other ships near the CV. If I'm approaching an enemy CV in a DD, I often chose to NOT reveal myself because I'll probably die before sinking the CV if he is vaguely competent. Having fire is VERY relevant when trying to gun down a full health tier 10 CV with peashooters, while yourself is usually and probably taken damage beforehand. Especially if it had any effect on the insane cycling of attacks at point blank.

You mean like it's awkward when 2 ships are fighting in a storm and you only see your teammate blasting away at something invisible that is 9km away from you? Or when you peek your front out behind an island and fire your front turrets, yet invisible because the other 70% of your ship (and highest point) is hidden behind a stone?

That's all and well, but since we NEVER see this, there is no reason for us to believe your words. It's like the government says "we give out speeding tickets to people who drive too fast", yet this is never observed by anyone else, nor published in the news that some are caught. And then we see the SAME speeders re-appear again and again. TKing 780 people is not VERY LIKELY to be by accident and probably happens consistenly over time. If there is any automatic monitoring, this person should have been flagged repeatedly and hopefully manually inspected at some point. However call this person an "idiot" (not a completely unexpected reaction when people deliberately ruin your game, nor extremely profane or vulgar) and you'll have a nice chatban. @TheWarJaC I'm sure you don't want to ban accounts for fun as it would be destructive for the potential income, but I find it hard to believe that having these extreme players are good for the retention of "normal" players. Just which policies would it violate that you post "player xxx" has been banned"? As they are gone they can't be "shamed" anymore for sure, nor can it be linked to a real person. Even some anonymous posting like "34 accounts got 1 month ban for repeatedly afk this month", "3 accounts got permabanned for destructive gameplay this month" would be appreciated.

Possibly it's used in different ways, yet 1) the meaning of the word is very clear 2) The definition in google is taken from Oxford Languages, which I would think has some merit 3) as for my own interpretation, in my country the word "cashback" (generally written in english even) means exactly that, you will get a (usually small) % returned to your account. Often used by credit cards. anyways it's mostly irrelevant I suppose.

@YabbaCoe And you guys wonder why we have little faith in people getting banned?

no no, you see the treatment is to press report. It makes me feel better! (probably regression towards the mean). But given there is a rocket nerf coming, any nerf is welcome... A pity since playing against CV was more fun and immersive when they had rarer but potentially massive damage strikes. And could be deplaned reliably.

If the 100 planes attacked at once, it would feel more "fair" than being hit by 2 and 2 and 2 over a long period.. :P

It is placebo - just like all the other placebo effects - I feel better even if nothing truly changed

I know, and it's not like I'm going to to buy anything from WG anymore. I was very happy to buy premium time while the game was new and WAY more enjoyable. But calling it "cashback" is misleading in my eyes. Something like "triple dubloon madness" would be more descriptive.

That goes for most ships really. Any attempts at a bit daring play is usually punished very badly since everyone and their CV knows where you are...or he might just pop up the moment you're at the point of no return, but REALLY need to be hidden another 20 seconds... Then it's time to use the ingame placebo called "report player"!

So maybe you can confim that since it says "cashback" - a very clear definition.. If i buy dubloons for €100, a bit later i will get back €200? because that's exactly what it means...

See 4 posts up. Was busy kicking behind with småland..

I want that as flag indeed! However the solution for thunderer is easy. Maybe I have to change the module!

BOOHOOO! have to move under 22km!! what will thunderer players do now?!

€32 will either be eating out, saved for holidays or investing on the stock market. Not a pixelboat

Well, bigger than CVs... :P

Showing off my my amazing ability to spot, thinking some of the big ships behind me can get some stealth firing before I move on. How does this happen?? First 1, then 2.. after several salvos.

Mine looks really good when it's attached to the "port" module

It's probably a coming feature on some RU ship..