Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Nibenay78

Players
  • Content Сount

    3,266
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    27734
  • Clan

    [_I_]

Everything posted by Nibenay78

  1. Firing DD AP into other DDs with broadside slaughters them. Just like any other Class firing AP at same class... Usually its max 1-2 salvos though, unless the other DD just drives straight with full broadside. *Cough* But lucky them had anti-DD measures against you...
  2. I doubt that was to me? But its way more forgiving than wot. I'd not mind if they tightened the screws slightly, instead of coming up with these dupb Didn't even know it was 28 tier X tech tree ships... Clearly you don't play enough OP DDs, you really should...
  3. Which we all know. Yet it could still be the design AND reward players for good play?
  4. Nibenay78

    General CV related discussions.

    You assume stuff. I stated 4 major complaints that pop up about rework CVs. Do you deny that any of these complaints are frequently pointed to? I also pointed out why these spesific complaints are NOT valid for RTS and thus more RTS matches would not give more of these complaints. There certainly may be more of other complaints indeed. But then we are back to assuming things. What would you rate as top RTS complaints? In my eyes it is a heavy annoyance every 2nd games compared to a sometimes OP-but-often-interesting experience every 20th game. We are up to what now.. 1000 pages? Not counting the many closed ones popping up at times. And this is because of a class that at most is less than 17% of the population in tier 7+ matches. I would love to see the amount of discussion pages counted for both types.
  5. Nibenay78

    General CV related discussions.

    That is only your assumptions. More CV might give more complaints, yet the main compaints are: 1) No counterplay - which CLEARLY existed before by having the right ship and consumable! 2) Unlimited planes - yes they are not unlimited, but you get the point. There is always another plane to take off with - Old CVs did NOT have this option. 3) No fires - This really breaks verisimilitude for me. While all ships are loaded with fun flammable stuff, CVs clearly most of all. - RTS CVs burned like everyone else and suffered even more. 4) Unlimited spotting - sure the RTS could spot a ton too - yet they had to chose between spotting and striking So everything about the quality. Even with immersion the RTS was better. The battle was over you and you could even help either your teammates by spesifically targeting dangerous strike craft, or help your own CV by targeting fighters. It was an interesting game of chess. AA cruisers could be USEFUL due to long range strong AA, and correct positioning was good.
  6. Nibenay78

    General CV related discussions.

    Well its hardly stated as a special feature, but i suppose that's why US cruisers kicks arse against planes! oh wait... they dont anymore
  7. 10 101 more than me! you could've saved 10k!
  8. You already have one! go ahead with the statsshaming
  9. Have no life and play a lot? Preferably ships with premium camo... and dont suck too much.
  10. I suspect all of them are okay. I prefer to get tier 10 if possible if any ships. Thank you for the insights anyways. Doubloons are slow, like for everyone, but once you outfit your favorite ship with it, the credits never stop coming... Granted it's not like the insane multiplier of Missouri, but as long as every game is okay profit, what else does a poor guy need? And then you get the occational 1-14 days of free prem anyways. I fell down to 475 mill though. I feel poor Buying Riga and then grinding her to Petro in about 12 hours didn't help for the money situation.
  11. So which should I get? :D I generally don't "grind" for either. I just play the game and get what I get. Usually picking "more resources" crates as long as I remember to do so... But clearly silver is not an issue tbh. Btw if you check my ships, I have premium camo on Minotaur - bought with saved-up-dubloons.
  12. I do, but I almost never play her. Quite nice to use in ranked occationally though. But hardly needed for money... edit: in fact less battles than expected
  13. Nibenay78

    General CV related discussions.

    Give me proximity fuse upgrade for the AA cannons please.
  14. Does that make me a whale? I've not spent a single euro on wows for the last.. 4-5 years?
  15. Nibenay78

    General CV related discussions.

    And how exactly does this grief the enemy CV? I want to watch planes burn, winning is less relevant :-o
  16. Nibenay78

    General CV related discussions.

    I can only look forward to meeting you again while playing Minotaur. I'll be in my smokecloud wanking with a semblance of old AA and promoting fun (edit: and static) gameplay.
  17. Nibenay78

    General CV related discussions.

    @Beastofwar I think most understands that WG must create new content and make changes to last longer. Carriers already existed from the start of the game, yet the amount of complains now seems vastly bigger. So clearly the same content can create really different responses depending how it is implemented. There has been many changes in WoWs since it was released. See which change made the most negative response by far.
  18. Nibenay78

    General CV related discussions.

    Isnt it kinda dumb that raking the deck of any carrier with a massive amount of 406mm AP does... NOTHING? It certainly doesnt add to the verisimilitude...
  19. Nibenay78

    another example of broken carriers

    We have a game called world of knights. It contains Knights (good vs archers), archers (good vs spearmen) and spearmen (good vs knights). The balance is kinda fair and people who like medieval battles start playing. But hey, lets introduce gunpowder! musketmen are good vs all! And fun and engaging! except for maybe those who enjoyed the medieval part of the game which this game is named after.... Later on we can progress to nuclear weapons here also. It's probably going to be what people playing "world of knights" were joining for. Too bad the suckers dont want to adapt.
  20. Nibenay78

    another example of broken carriers

    It's a bad situation, personally I have been in this a ton of times, yet it's perfectly possible to pull off a win. Harder, sure. but it's also hard to win when one ends up in other endgame configurations. DD vs DM for eksample?
  21. Nibenay78

    another example of broken carriers

    They had their chance BEFORE the DDs died. If one should follow your logic, then EVERY SINGLE non-dd must be quippped with radar. After all not all games have CV, or it dies before end of game (gasp, CVs are UP)
  22. Nibenay78

    another example of broken carriers

    it's a joke. At some point we were 3 people in the same smoke spamming "O" because it's the only thing that does damage... yet the moment smoke disappears, one can only hope they are so incredibly incompetent they miss..
  23. Nibenay78

    another example of broken carriers

    The anti DD mechanics are not missing from the game. They died earlier. It's likely you were involved in their demise.
  24. Nibenay78

    another example of broken carriers

    I just played some tier 4 matches to help a RL friend yesterday. Damn I feel useful when the planes are over me and you see the damage tick in ..1...1...1...2...1..2...2..
×