-
Content Сount
3,266 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
27734 -
Clan
[_I_]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Nibenay78
-
I would strongly suggest to remove the hard limit and see how it goes... After all, they are fair and balanced, so we can have 5-6 of them on each side like other ships do sometimes.
-
Thank you Wargaming for saving me money!
Nibenay78 replied to VenividiviciNL's topic in General Discussion
Vastly OP i tell you! And for free! ignore the low number of battles.Clearly winrate will keep the same after 1000 battles!! -
aa Your investment into AA? Captian skill points, Ship upgrades, Consumbles
Nibenay78 replied to Adm_Andre's topic in General Discussion
MEWLING how new ships don't pick on DDs is pretty irrelevant when everyone and their dog can play the old ones.- 119 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- anti air
- captian build
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Last time I had a really good double salvo at a ~24km moving target in Montana, I hit 7 of 12 superheavy AP shells in both salvos! Not too shabby... If it wasn't the fact that all hits landed on the flight deck and bounced...
-
aa Your investment into AA? Captian skill points, Ship upgrades, Consumbles
Nibenay78 replied to Adm_Andre's topic in General Discussion
And even with all the maxed out crap on the best AA ships, it certainly doesn't protect you OR others to any useful degree. isn't it sad that even on good AA DDs, it's considered a waste to build AA? Says something about AA builds in general. PS. Minotaur should get DefAA! Wonder why there are hard limits on CVs then, if we had 4 on each side, the modules would be soooo much more useful right! to OP - only on Minotaur to vaguely pretend to annoy newbie CV players who doesn't understand what the black stuff is!- 119 replies
-
- anti air
- captian build
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Sneaking around in anything larger than a DD is generally not possible nowadays due to the abnormal-cell-growth-CVs And if they are a bit altert you can forget about sneaking around in a DD too. rip interesting gameplay
-
Another Hybrid but its much much worse
Nibenay78 replied to totally_potato's topic in General Discussion
I'll be good with having a unique upgrade only for Missouri that adds AA missiles and massive dps increase. -
I never bought any premium ships! Anyways, I just use them when playing lower div's with RL friends who just started (and they hate CVs and their mechanics)
-
It's turning into those mobile games. The disgruntled x-employee whose name shall not be mentioned does indeed have a few fair points. This game is made for churn, not for people who likes that getting better... Just tell me which ship I can play that can mostly ignore CV and Subs. oh wait, I'm guessing Minotaur will do ok there too.
-
Another Hybrid but its much much worse
Nibenay78 replied to totally_potato's topic in General Discussion
I think There should be no hard limit on CVs, in fact 4-5 CVs pr team would be great. People would really enjoy this. -
An end to friendly fire.. I have read that right haven't I?
Nibenay78 replied to Migantium_Mashum's topic in General Discussion
So because od that we should just do everything to make it worse? I suggest we just remove the ships and play laser shooting ufos deal 1 dmg on a hit, has 1 hp and 0 armor and respawn after 1 sec. Going to make wows a blast -
I'll be good playing radar ships...
-
RN BBs are kinda boring, play some proper AP using BBs like Montana edit: Conqueror is ok with stealth build and sneaking up on unsuspecting victims with AP... HE shooting at 20km is at a tad boring in the long run for me.
-
Are we surprised?
-
Hmm, if possible i like to push as close to the cap in big ships to help the smaller ones. This often requires to sit bow on and careful positioning. I suppose this is bad and static gameplay. So I will be doing full speed dynamic gameplay at 18km+ so you and WG will be happy
-
Indeed they do. Unless it's some game with some excellent story or such, I would consider 30-60 hours very poor. The last two games I bought was KSP for (i guess) around €25 and Factorio for around €15 No doubt if the player enjoys one particular ship, it'd be worth the money spent on some premium. Yet I still feel (very subjective thing) that getting a "slightly different" ship isn't comparable to getting a "whole other game". as an example: Playing Black or Småland is of course "unique" in wows context, yet instead having only access to silver DD would be "mostly the same" when comparing to playing KSP or Factorio.
-
Because it's insanely overpriced that 1 (supposedly weak) piece of item inside a game costs about as much as a full game?
-
I'm good skipping any and all rewards coming from any anime related event! But i'm sure OP could benefit from one. If only i put one on Montana once I got it instead of prem time...
-
If players hang around long enough they will scrap together 5000 dubloons for a tier X camo to slap on their favorite ship. I have only on 1, but then again I have a ton of free premium ships anyways. The camo is vastly more interesting than suffering tier 8 tanks in wows though. Not sure clarifying OPs misunderstanding in regards to farming fire dmg is laughing at them.
-
130k is just 1 BB with a bit healing. Now if those 130k was done only to tier X DD/CL your pay would be quite different.
-
Premium time is fine when they offer a good game, and stopping when they don't. That point happened a long time ago for me. Buying ships only promote making gimmic/OP/annoying ships so they can sell even more of them.
-
Flat bonus was just so much better...
-
Not sure it had marbles to begin with
-
I can only look forward to when Polaris sumarines are released
-
Alternative is to not play tier 6 or just not play the game.
