-
Content Сount
3,266 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
27734 -
Clan
[_I_]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Nibenay78
-
What you think Weegee's answer will be next week in response of the CC's walkout??
Nibenay78 replied to Andrewbassg's topic in General Discussion
Missomakarov? It looks like a Missouri but really is a Makarov -
For a small fee, WG will give you what they think makes a good era.
-
Probably smart. Think I have to update my one and only steam review ever..
-
I know what you meant, i was just making fun. Even while trying to learn them I found the gameplay really boring, OP or UP. Since WG ignores the insane numbers on their spreadsheets, I stopped playing the abnormal-cell-growth-ships To little effect. Although I'd say that if I was a new player starting hosho and you have this seemingly pathetic single drop torp.. I'd find some other class to play. Then again I preferred large alfa strikes directed mostly against larger ships as in RTS, and at that time I mostly played BB..
-
What would you rate the current state of the game and why? (EU Edition)
Nibenay78 replied to Srle_Vigilante's topic in General Discussion
I suppose, just minor ones though :p -
Fantasy general is still not bad..
-
What would you rate the current state of the game and why? (EU Edition)
Nibenay78 replied to Srle_Vigilante's topic in General Discussion
I think it should say "uploading credit card and bank details" -
What would you rate the current state of the game and why? (EU Edition)
Nibenay78 replied to Srle_Vigilante's topic in General Discussion
Absolutely worth it to counter people who go "nice graphics and historical ships 10 of 10". And only poll that might impact WG at all. In fact my only steam review ever. -
Well clearly if all my ships had identical stats, CV might not be an issue power-wise at at least (they would still be boring and destructive for gameplay though!) And its more fun to do a bit of interpretation..
-
Some seemed less emotional then others about it, and I'd assume a 300 battles player feels less invested/addicted than people like myself and @Europizza only WG knows...
-
What?? Are you saying I'm not a 75% wr player?? My poor self esteem
-
I forgot to mention, most of those who responded did so with something like "ok i will uninstall this game", so not sure that pushes anyone up...
-
Not particularly and I hope submarines gets scrapped (right, will never happen). Being my kind self, most of the matches I said my greetings, explained that WG believes that CVs are fair and balanced and they (my enemies) can't stop my attacks. I was also kind enough to let anyone who said something know that moving up would only make matters worse, and strongly adviced them to not buy anything from WG. I am the kindest of the kind, I know!
-
What would you rate the current state of the game and why? (EU Edition)
Nibenay78 replied to Srle_Vigilante's topic in General Discussion
Why vote here? Go vote on steam or something... -
Spot what's wrong..... You expect too much?
-
LittleWhiteMouse leaves the CC program
Nibenay78 replied to Miscommunication_dept's topic in General Discussion
Pretty sure their revenue says otherwise -
LittleWhiteMouse leaves the CC program
Nibenay78 replied to Miscommunication_dept's topic in General Discussion
I agree, its quite sad to waste so much money. It makes me feel unwell... no wonder they earn well. -
I think most people enjoys being in power, even in surface ships one can have this feeling. RTS gave this feeling way more to me than what the rework does. In fact I find it boring and bland but hey, I can understand not everyone likes the RTS style. I did enjoy playing on the RTS map. Different taste and all that. I don't mind CVs being "strong" (not OP, however we define that) or having a higher skillceiling. I mind that especially rework CVs subtract so many options for surface ships. RTS CVs were strong too. I agree, now lets say you negate the first strike reasonably well, it leaves you set up for the second strike being a complete hit.. while being exposed again and again. in RTS trying to avoid the massive alfa was generally worth showing some broadside as a calculated risk. (a moment I found to some degree enjoyable - @Pikkozoikum because it fit my versimilitude of CVs being dangerous alfa strikes against capital ships). But the skill gap should decrease..right? RIGHT?? No no, its called PRO! CV! PLAYER! kthx. I knew you would appreciate.
-
Hey, I was forgotten too. I'm pretty good with SeeVee play! look look!
-
I like the AA effect and immersion it gives. It is the only positive thing regarding the rework. I love the flak clouds popping up and seeing the muzzle fire from the AA guns. Yet we both know very well this is a cosmetic thing and could be added in RTS also. The rework gameplay only subtracted immersion in all other ways quite significantly though.
-
I doubt the managers even read anything here. Probably some underpaid staff notes down suggestions and delivers them to someone who puts them in a drawer :) It can be, but with almost 1000 pages of "permitted" CV threads, I think mos ideas has been covered and suggested. Don't let me stop you though! If you wish I can make some negative comments on it :D (Even my manager of the company that hires me said my constant negative comments are well worth the money they pay...)
-
Probably so as you seem to enjoy the rework. Good for you! Correct, at one point I would have said WoWs is one of the most fun games I have played. Before I even welcomed the occational CV match that happened. Noone relevant (read: WG managers) cares and the rest of us are irrelevant. We tried also.
-
No you are on a different planet. Anways let me know when they get ballistic missile subs with nukes, I will reinstall and try how fun it is. I mean fun is a subjective thing. Maybe it will be great to basically have no gameplay.
-
You mean newbie CVs will do even less, while newbie non-CVs will learn they can enjoy 2 minutes of unavoidable attacks...
-
Most homing stuff dont belong in most shooting games I have played. Are we here to blasts people with our own eyes and brain and ability to lead and secondguess others (to the best of our ability as good or bad as it may be), or just click and let the cpu do it? The latter sounds like games I dont play.
