-
Content Сount
3,266 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
27734 -
Clan
[_I_]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Nibenay78
-
[POLL] Subs: would you prefer manual torps or keep homing torps?
Nibenay78 replied to Mrs_Ragdoll's topic in General Discussion
Cough CVs cough.. Manual, anything automatic sucks.- 76 replies
-
- subs
- homing torps
-
(and 6 more)
Tagged with:
-
Poor them. Their good job disappearing in the piles of managment crap
-
Somebody help me understand wg logic behind which ships get asw
Nibenay78 replied to leonport's topic in General Discussion
Bow down to the BB master race! Edit: i forgot infidel! -
Cruiser vs Sub: Pinged, Homing torps coming, DCP, DCP ends, another ping, same torps pick up homing again??????, D E A D.
Nibenay78 replied to PaxtonQuigly's topic in General Discussion
Value your money more... no prem ship is that much more fun than silver ships. Use the saved money and go eat a dinner with him out. :D (btw we all know there are no females online!) -
Cruiser vs Sub: Pinged, Homing torps coming, DCP, DCP ends, another ping, same torps pick up homing again??????, D E A D.
Nibenay78 replied to PaxtonQuigly's topic in General Discussion
Are there tier 4 subs so we can educate new players on how great WG made this game? Hosho style -
I think i made a post similiar to this just after CV rework: There are 2 ways to get the most out of a mature (and popular) product 1) you keep trying to improve the product with quality updates to make a good experience even better, ensuring more long term profit with high player retention. 2) you use the current popularity and implement "popular" features and basically slaugher the product for more short term profit with higher churn. WG chose their way a while ago.
- 97 replies
-
- 10
-
-
"A bit iffy" isnt the correct term. The correct term involves cencored words. My experience in poor powercrept Montana is that GK is a reliable source of damage income pr salvo.
-
My version sounds better. To do the WG version: I am sorry you feel that way but we almost successfully invaded and its been a great success ever after.
-
Uninstalled, and feeling very relieved.
Nibenay78 replied to Pametrada's topic in General Discussion
By this logic should I assume you dont vote? I mean 1 out of millions are irrelevant after all. Id rather give my negative vote on steam than not, regardless how irrelevant it may be. -
Uninstalled, and feeling very relieved.
Nibenay78 replied to Pametrada's topic in General Discussion
It seems more like this though. The forum has some decent entertainment value. Especially when travelling and one has to wait a lot of various in-laws :D -
And inert sponge surviving not because of your amazing "counterplay" and skill, but because of their massive incompetence...
-
Boo hiss! Its more fun in a fresh thread
-
Well yes, but I suppose there is a grain of realism there with arming the fuses and overpenetrating? Edit: personally I enjoy switching to HE with Halsey in Montana. Its not exactly cutting much slack for the DDs
-
Verisimilitude wasnt bad. Even when CVs battled above your head, you felt a bit useful when targeting the enemy CVs fighters to help gain airsuperiority... Now most aspects are less immersive
-
More so that if 2 surface ships were so incompetent, they would be back in port instead of being constantly annoying.
-
I dont disagree. I'm just saying that the mechanics are dumb.
-
Now I'm not some unicum player so sometimes I lose all my hitpoints quite fast and die after a few minutes. I feel that when I play DD, the mechanics should be changed so even if i get spotted by a smolensk or minotaur early (and at point blank) I can still survive and last about 10 minutes into the game
-
Maybe if this thread reaches 1000+ pages like the other. Oh wait, WG managers decided subs with homing torpedoes are great for income.. Sadly they will stay just like CVs. Anti air or armor? in either case still think it can be implemented with manual aim. All this automation dumbs down the game incredibly in my opinion. But i guess it makes it easier for extreme casuals to join for 5 minutes and toss some money at WG. RIP wows
-
Yes well as i highlighted, some mechanics are just what you said. Like DefAA..cough. My apology. I just had to. Other than that my experience in most wargames is that any sort of automatic lock on/homing is outright destructive for gameplay (edit: also includes auto-repair and auto-launch-CAP). Homing torpedoes are a notch over torpedo planes on the dumbness scale. Anyways back to xcom2...
-
You feel that 100% homing is a bit much? maybe WG can tone it down to 99% homing. You know like airborne torpedoes are...
-
Wrote a long review a year ago, in my usual sparkly and happy way. In fact my only steam review. Well worth the time it took.
-
What is worse than getting a permacamo for a ship you don't have ?
Nibenay78 replied to meuhbat's topic in General Discussion
Well now you have a minor incentive for getting Cheshire... -
Whats wrong? it's just a pciture of the ship Assholio Asashio? @Europizza Did I miss something?
-
Can i pretend? my country almost invaded UK successfully 1000 years ago or whatever.... cough. And I speak well english! She sells sea shells on the sea shore!... My friend has an apc...oh wait!
-
Sure. Would you welcome it into WoWs? Would it game gameplay richer? possibly, but also possibly not...
