Nibenay78

I really want to know what the definition of RPS is for WG??? For me it would mean something like class BB generally would have a significant/major advantage in battle vs cruisers, possibly in a 1 vs 1 scenario but also by simply being a participant in the battle as a whole. It's not the most detailed definition but it's enough for me. This advantage should NOT mean 100% of encounters comes out better for the BB. This does work for me "generally" with BB vs CA/LC vs DD. How exactly does submarines counter CV on a general basis? Are CVs noticably disadvantaged by the SS participating? Does it frequently die against SS? This is not the principle of RPS. This is just taking an example that is possible to happen by sheer randomness. Your example is like saying "the shima actually killed off the chasing DM". Sure it can happen, sure it will happen, but I don't think either me or you will call DDs a strong opponent to cruisers, or say that cruisers are going to have a hard battle because it's less BB and more DDs. In your example the DD was not a counter, not useful. Wasting 10-15 minutes to get a single kill (usually getting killed instead), while playing ones own ship as not participating and in fact doing the complete opposite of what it should do is not a counter.

Not a big loss really, it takes almost no time to reach 10 points. I'd love to donate away some of them if possible.,..

If it's OP it should be nerfed If it's not, but they just nerf them to make people buy new ships, its horrible salesmanship. either way - I didn't buy a single ship and would never use money for anything but premium - which I happily would pay as long as the game is fun and engaging....

Agree. I personally do not gamble, as its just extra tax for people who don't know mathematics. But then again, many do have issues with their gambling impulse, so I'd easily call WG very unethical in their way to get in money.

People are against shaite mechanics and unfun gameplay. Personally I'd love to have CVs and Subs in the game. As it is today I really dislike both. I have 3 RL friends playing with me currently. One is rather experienced and he just hates CV with a passion. The two new ones just dont have the experience/map awareness to deal with subs and CVs. At low tiers they pretty much learned that they can do NOTHING against CVs but die in slow ships with 0 AA. .Its just annoying to pick the wrong ship (which means most) and know you'll can probably forget sneaking up, flanking alone, trying to create crossfires and-so-on-and-so-forth. The "evolution" you talk about is just adding more ships, but subtracting from the gameplay choices from most other ships.

No, but they certainly built up their distrust over time, I see no reason why it should not take time to get back to "normal" trust again. Or should we just ignore continous disrespect? That was just the most blatant example. edit: just to make it clear: it's really nice they made this post and the "apology" post. I find this one rather interesting at times, yet some part comes out as camel-piss. How many times did experienced players/CCs point out issues almost in unison and give constructive citisicm, only to be slapped in the face by WG? Just to take a dumb example: WG needed 6+ months of data to realize Hosho is insanely OP having 2 torps against ships with 0 AA?

Anything more than one map is redundant. More maps should be premium content.

And did you consider why this has happened, or maybe we missed our bonuscodes? (FkUshaka and fkUnibby)

Any carrier slowly sinking beneath the waves.

When you beat the winning team in XP is a tad frustrating to lose... The rest:

Corrected it slightly for you

If you want fun and engaging gameplay - you don't.

Finally I get the ballistic missile ships and then we will have a fun and engaging game!

I suppose by that time I can select USS Enterprise in port. And I don't mean CVN-65.

T12 CVs might be an issue

Soon™ we will get a sub rework where their goals are less skillgap and more popularity. Just this time it will become RTS subs...

When do I get manual AA so I can see where it is effective or not?

They dont, but it felt good to be able to make serious and proper complaints about the many excrement-from-cow sub issues. Do i think WG cares and it will be removed? Not for a second, they will at best tweak things so people like me find it vaguely survivable.

I would rather flush down 14.91 gbp in the toilet. But I suppose we have different opinions.

With the amount of HE shells flying around, it's nothing new.

By sheer number of people, we will probably find some (marginal) group that would enjoy that a ship could auto-kill the entire opposite team simply if that person clicked LMB faster upon start than the enemy. I don't deny that there would be people who would enjoy it, but I still would find it hard to understand why... Opposites Attract but Similarities Last.

They are visually beautiful, but then again WoWs is a visually good game. I'm clearly not taking the right pills. Which ones should I get to share your opinion on them?

"Page 404 of 404" WG is reading: Error 404 CV complaints not found.

Like the criminal 3x40% division works the opposite way... n00b!

So far only chatbans for calling CVs by their correct abnormal-cell-growth-disease name. They are still more annoying than most suckmarines, since most actually do suck in them.