Nibenay78

No, because it warrants a chatban, but ruining games is ok

Ruining the game repeatedly over 1000s of game is ok. Saying a semi-bad word in chat nets you a week or 2 chatban.

And most of them from some Admiral...

Nice to see someone interested to get better in the reasonable way. I do have a few comments that while you may be doing all of it, it's useful to think about. Do you actually manage to use the information? Especially during fighting? I have RL friends whom I have to SCREAM over voicechat to, because they are firing at people far away while having broadside ships appear at 5km.. Or dont notice a full push in their side, or DDs/subs etc appearing in bad positions. and AA range, do you turn it off and on (if relevant) Do you know gunfire range in smoke (if relevant) Certainly helps, although knowing when the opportunity arises, to not be too rigid in following it. Nice! Lone wolfing can be useful, especially if it's possibility for crossfire/torping or spotting, or simply having a ship on the empty side to threaten them. Firing, go dark, firing, go dark so they dont advance too fast or turn/fire after you. Quite possible to keep 2-4 ships busy alone. Sure you may not deal much damage, but they're also doing nothing. I honestly dont' think anyone can learn much from tier 2...

You n00b, blame yourself for not carrying hard enough Anything less than 12 kills has an unsure outcome...

Easy games for casual players. No aiming needed...

@Europizza Proof is overrated. He FEELS it's clearly a bug! He is allowed to his opinion without you asking for proof!!! whine!!!

I dont' see why anyone would play coop - except for knocking off snowflakes or testing a new ship. There is no challenge, no opposition, no point really.

You expect so much of todays new gamers... Like humility as newbies and ability to read and understand and reflect over what more experienced players says and posts.

I can only agree... the sad part is that shima guns actually hit hard but they are too busy dropping useless torps in the water.

I suggest an minor incremental buff with 10% increase in ruddershift, rate of fire, sigma. Also some 60mm plating with no reduction in speed. Edit: and some old style minotaur AA

My opinion: High winrate and decent damageoutput usually means said player in general is doing something useful so he wins more than average. Low number of battles makes the numbers less relevant as you get a higher possible deviation due to randomness.

Retro performance for retro looks Buff Montana instead!

How did I not get ViP section after all my incessant complaining? Discrimination of the most brutal kind. I think I had <10 posts before CV rework.

My first encounter with Minotaur (and not knowing much about it) was the enemy Mino coming around an island at 5-6km, probably fleeing from someone. I had Montana and all guns aimed in that general direction by accident. A double click later and almost full health Minotaur gone I thought: "well thats one ship I won't bother grinding". But it's clearly amazingly fun to push as close as possible in it, even "brawl" in it. note: brawling here means to live more than 20-30 seconds and be able to use the amazing dps to blow others to bits at 1-3km

griefer /ˈɡriːfə/ noun INFORMAL (in an online game or community) a person who harasses or deliberately provokes other players or members in order to spoil their enjoyment. "a class of entrepreneurs is emerging who see griefers not just as an annoyance but as a potential source of lost revenue" as for myself I obviously grief others mostly in Montana with almost 2000

Actually, with people like you, AA has no meaning. Against sub 50% players, AA can actually be useful. So that one didn't work! Back to Black(list)

Reminds me that I have to sell them for credits I don't need. When do they switch to being prem?

Would be best if WG blacklisted both of you...

Got randomly a Makarov in a random crate! I felt special... or unique?? oh wait...

Except most potato CVS are completely unaware they even have a a hull to care about and tend to rage in chat why the rest of us suck and didn't defend them, while the losing flank has been obvious for 5-10 minutes... and the CV even attacked them. I love these moments No doubt a lot of my reports come from not being able to stop making snide remarks towards said dead-but-raging CV.

Toot says the lemming train! At least OP asked a fair question to begin with...

Indeed, so without knowing what he damaged, it's a guesswork. Not that any of the payouts seem extraordinary to my n00b eyes.

Probably, but his victory didn't seem very impressive damage wise (unless he only hit DDs) so why wonder...

I fail to see the issue..