Nibenay78

Iä Iä Spreadsheet Fthagn! if they really used the words *edit* it's below professional, but then again we already knew that...

Very Soon™ As in "submarines are well balanced and very soon™ ready for official release" ?

I found this hilarious so I have to share it. Prelude: Me and enemy DD in cap, he smokes up and i fire torps at the smoke. He gets snagged by a millimeter on the rear and loses 95% hp. He calls me something rather bad, I just say noobs get torped in smoke. I get some raging pm and just point out he should do less coop... Today while playing, from another account with 8 games: Yes I consider it an achievement to get so much text from firing the most obvious and mandatory torpedospam

They only seek enouigh balance to make things tolerated by the majority...for the time being.

Not a problem, I enjoy it. As long as there is a reasonable chance to pull it off. Being spammed down by long range tiny ships makes it hard. And I don't think I can call myself "BB main" either.

Then the even more capable BBs like myself will get all the excess spamming and decide to wait it out behind a mountain. Even more passiveness. I prefer when they yolo and draw fire instead of going to A10. Provides the rest of us with opportunities.

And contributing to passive play by said BBs. Including myself who will just find another target until I can sneak up on said spammer.

Never played her or Minotaur with more. The short range forces players to be more into the action. That said I prefer smoke-inside-the-cap wank over 18km-spam-wank. but I suppose we have different wank-opinions

Before some of them did provide quite a bit of teamwork by having strong and large AA auras, often coupled with DefAA panic effect made them extra useful. Battlecruisers are good but they are a different class from the regulars..

I stand corrected, as far as I can see it lost AFT and went from 18.5ish to 16. Much better tbh!

Didn't say that did I now? I just think it's not amazingly fun to be burned down by Smolensk with 19km range. Let me be very clear: I appreciate that small ships can cause "significant" damage to bigger ships unlike in WoT. But some mechanics are more tedious than others. In the specific example I'm curious why it should even be allowed the possibility to have such long range.

Just because they don't have that much impact on the game, doesn't mean they are a good addition to the game. Reminds me something about carriers and subs..

I wonder why thats more fun..

I agree, I feel that fires should be more rare but more dangerous (and possibly even spread?), but the HE spam is incessant at high tiers. Making for a passive gameplay since noone likes to be spammed down by ships they can't see(smolensk)/can't hit(kiting gunboats)*. While I love to play Minotaur(and Smolensk is the same "type"), I'm happy they didn't give HE to Minotaur and made it squishy. I don't run range mod on either since it forces me to stay closer to the action. Also having a "short range" can be beneficial in regards to being spotted while firing. I think Smolensk should have a max range of 15-16km (or just removed) and/or have a really marginal firechance. British BBs should have their HE spam nerfed, including Thunderer. Good aim should be rewarded, not just being able to randomly land some HE shells at 19-20km. And lets not start about carrier spam keeping you flooded/burning.

Started the game to be hit by a neustra torp and had 500hp left after like 3 minutes and ended up with Solo warrior

XxBismarckxX1337 Such names are not promising either when they are your only backup on a flank

as a CV player, it's outright hilarious.

Lucky you! it's it great to have the great spreadshit tell you this?

Indeed... like I said, it was not relevant

I dont think he gets the idea. I will admit i used 20k free xp on Zieten because I mostly got bored.

1) Its a ship that can be gotten without a single euro paid, so if they choose to pay for something free, it's hardly pay to win. 2) A lot of people have enough free xp already - personally I have about 1.5 mill ready 3) The people who actually just "pay" they way in this game tend to suck donkey butt and probably will pay2lose

ITs why you dont go exactly bow on, but show a bit side. I was told Schlieffen has OP armor because it bounced 10 yama shells in a few salvos. But he fired at my 80 deg angled main belt... *rolleyes* If he aimed properly it would hurt like crazy. Yama is not a bad ship. Nor is Schlieffen particularly tanky...

I have it, and paid 0 for it so so not sure how that's p2w. And it has pretty much no armor and hitpoints for a BB.

Because people dont like to be punished for mistakes. They should've played Montana when it had Mount Everest size citadel.

I'm mostly worried about the insane turn radius on a ship that probably needs manouverability to account for no armor..