-
Content Сount
3,266 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
27734 -
Clan
[_I_]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Nibenay78
-
Met him once, it was a disaster as expected. Gave him a -1 which I'm sure was irrelevant. Placebo ftw
-
Well yes, but we are in Mr. Motions fantasy universe here after all..
-
Please provide the requested screenshot, and with 5k damage.
-
Apparently because they "need" a DD, so you are gambling to have one. or something along those lines. Note that in this discussion he called Annapolis a gambler ship (dependent to have a DD)
-
We will just have to AGREE on it ;)
-
better now? :D
-
Please do, and provide a screenshot of the detailed section. It is found under "Credits and XP" please see screenshot:
-
How much cash does 20k give? it's pretty low...
-
Titanic style you mean?
-
Maybe you should consider something called repair costs and see how much you earn (or lose..) doing 5k damage.
-
Still waiting to be a good looking blonde, instead of a bad looking blonde! edit: I'd like to keep my physical strength though. Is that fine?
-
I'm still she? I thought we cleared this up last time...
-
How did you interpret that? My statement means that I MOSTLY play tier 8, 9, and 10. I have about 680 million silver or thereabouts. Probably a meager amount compared to others here. They are not in tier 9 and 10 so it's great. Again you manipulated my statement into your own interpretation. I did NOT say I love them. I said I prefer tier 6, not stated played by me or others.
-
Or you pressed DefAA...
-
I prefer CVs and Subs that are tier 6 (or lower if possible), since I rarely play less than tier 8 in other ships
-
-
You're doing it on purpose now. to stay on topic: Buff Enterprise with a negative plane capacity.
-
You bastard, I want it also! So I can say it's just floating around in port...
-
Submarine Survey 2.0 - The questions that really matter
Nibenay78 replied to nerderklaus's topic in General Discussion
Me too, but I think this changed in 2018ish to 2. option. If I had seen the level of FOMO, blingbling and spam that the game puts out today, I simply would have avoided it back in 2016. These kind of games (even if gameplay is ok) is best avoided in my opinion. It's hard to quit once you've played a bit and know that the base can is (or was) very enjoyable. In fact I think wows in 2017 was one of the most enjoyable games in 30 years for me. -
Also funny how the armored decks are so incredibly resilient, considering the deck would be covered with planes (and fuel and ammo). You might even think it should be easier to start a fire and harder to put it out. cough.
-
Submarine Survey 2.0 - The questions that really matter
Nibenay78 replied to nerderklaus's topic in General Discussion
Once WoWs had a certain popularity, they had 2 options to keep it going. * Continue on the more "historical path" and make a game that long term players will keep using money on. * Use the current popularity to create a more fantasy game, flooding it with content, boxes, FOMO early access ships and more flashy bits. As long as a new player spends a bit, it doesn't matter how long he actually stays. He or she will also see older and decent players sail around in premiums and kick arse (relatively to a new player) and waste money on pay2Lose high tier ships... -
I propose we remove the flight deck from all T10 CVs. It will solve a lot of stress...
-
To all others: remember to report the CVs and dont defend your own CV. Good luck.
-
The above is amazing. Submarines are played by players that enjoy griefing. There you go!
