Smegger213

Well, it never pushed me to tier 10. I have been playing the game since the Closed Alpha, but I still do not have 1 tech tree tier 10 ship on my account. I did grind the coal to get the Yoshino though. But the reason for that is that World of Tanks was always my favourite game. But for the last year, Warships has become my favourite game. That was until they released Submarines into the mix. Now I have stopped playing all together with this account, and I only play a few games on my alternative account.

What I am on about is the rise in the numbers of premium ships in the game. It was worse in World of Tanks. In that game, Wargaming added far too many tier 8 premium tanks into the game. They also started to release far too many tier 8 premium tanks that were all out better than their tech tree equivalents Now they have started to add tier 9 premium tanks into the game too. This has had a direct effect on the matchmaker in World of Tanks. EG, playing a tier 6 tank in WoT started to become intolerable. Because you would end up in a tier 8 game for 80% of the time. I am saying that to some extent, the same thing is happening in Warships.

Have you counted the number of premium ships there are. Just a quick count of tier 7 to 10 premium ships for sale in the premium shop comes to a total of 76 ships. Plus that does not count the number of premium ships that have been removed from sale. Nor does it count the number of premium ships that can be got for free with coal or steel etc. When you add that many premium ships into the mix, it is bound to have an effect on the matchmaker.

Go away, I am not interested in your garbage anymore.

I don't give a monkeys t___ of your opinion. Did I say Superships were premiums? No I didn't. What I am on about, is the number of players playing premium ships of higher tiers is increasing, due to Wargaming adding more and more into the game. This means that a player trying to grind their way up the tech trees are finding themselves bottom tier more and more often. Exactly the same thing happened in World of Tanks. They added tons of tier 8 premium tanks into that game, it screwed the matchmaker so bad. They had to come up with the Frontline game mode, to take out a lot of tier 8 tanks out of the normal random queue. Then they added tier 9 premium tanks too. This made the matchmaking worse. The same thing is happening in warships.

The more premium ships that get added into the game, the matchmaker gets worse. I think that applies to mainly tier 7, 8, 9 and 10 premium ships. More players play the premiums, the more players playing tech tree ships end up bottom tier. Same goes for the number of stupid superships added to the game, the matchmaker gets worse. Its pathetic, and a result of pure GREED.

You know that Wargaming will NEVER reveal that information. The reason being that the proper dislike ratio will be far greater than the figure that we can see from people that have that browser extension. If the browser extension is showing 3 times as many dislikes on a submarine video. Then you can bet that the real number of dislikes is probably 5 times worse. Wargaming also ignore the fact that every poll that has been put on the forum has shown an overwhelming hatred of submarines. But Wargaming say, "tough, we are going to ignore the majority, and cater for the very small minority". Well, I can tell you that taking that attitude will only result in one thing. MORE PLAYERS QUITTING THE GAME. The talk of multi server battles proves that player numbers are dropping. Oh dear, never mind. You bring it on yourself Wargaming.

It is not just on the forums that you see a total negativity towards submarines. Look at all the "DISLIKES" on every Submarine Video on the Warships official channel. Because Youtube now hides these dislikes, does not alter the fact that there are over 3 times as many dislikes than there are likes. Also look at Streamers like Flammu. You can see in his stream all the chat is about the negativity towards submarines. Wargaming, you are ignoring the feedback to please your own warped agenda. Submarines are BAD FOR THE GAME. Player numbers are dropping, and will continue to drop with this garbage. I have un-installed for the first time since I started playing this game in the Closed Alpha. Do you really want all us veteran players to stop playing? There will need to be major changes to temp me back. SO LONG, AND THANKS FOR ALL THE FISH.

Let me guess. You are one of the VERY FEW players that want submarines. Also, I never said anything about winning. I will tell you more of what happened to me. First I was attacked by the CV with dive bombers. These hit me with one of two attacks. This took some of my HP away. Then the CV came back with torpedo bombers. I managed to avoid the first drop of torps. But that put me out of position. Then the 2nd flight of aircraft came back and dropped more torps at me. At least 2 of these torps hit me. This caused flooding that was threatening to sink me. So I popped my damage control to stop the flooding. Then guess what happened? A sub popped up from less than 4km away, and sonar pinged me. With no damage control to stop the sonar lock, I then ate 4 torps from the sub that I HAD NO CHANCE OF AVOIDING. This wiped me out. The sub was not spotted until it was practically on top of me. So I say again, WARGAMING WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO BALANCE SUBS, EVER.

1 Tier 8 CV and 2 poxy subs on each team. I was playing with HMS Nelson. First the tier 8 CV singled me out with bombs and then torps. Then I was wiped out by a U-69 Subs torps that I could do nothing about. I have played this ONCE GREAT game since the Closed Alpha, BUT ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. Wargaming, you can shove your game where the sun don't shine. Both World of Tanks (played since 2012) and World of Warships (played since the closed alpha) have been UN-INSTALLED. There is only so much crap, I am prepared to put up with. ANOTHER DISSATISFIED CUSTOMER QUITS. Well done!!!!!

Over £98 for a CV lol. What a complete joke this game is becoming.

Yep, 2 x CV's and 2 x Subs on each side is a complete joke. Esp if you happen to be a tier 6 in a game with tier 8 CV's and tier 8 Subs.

I have never read such hot garbage answers in one dev blog. UNTIL NOW. WARGAMING, WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO WAKE UP TO THE FACT THAT YOU WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO BALANCE SUBMARINES EVER. THAT IS WHY YOU INITIALLY STATED THAT SUBS WOULD NOT BE ADDED TO THE GAME. YOU KNEW ALL ALONG THAT YOU COULD NOT BALANCE THEM. YET YOU WENT AHEAD AND ADDED THEM ANYWAY, TO THE DISMAY OF 80% OF THE PLAYER BASE. I will NEVER play your hot garbage underwater crap, EVER. I will NEVER play any CV either, but that is another matter entirely. Wargaming, have you looked at the number of Dislikes on all the recent official Youtube video's on the subject of submarines? All the recent Youtube videos from the official warships Youtube channel have 4 times the number of dislikes, compared to the number of likes. THAT SHOULD BE TELLING YOU SOMETHING WARGAMING? BUT AS USUAL, IT IS FALLING ON edited DEAF EARS. MARK MY WORDS, YOU WILL LOSE MORE PLAYERS THAN YOU WILL GAIN, DUE TO ADDING PATHETIC SUBMARINES INTO THE GAME.

It could be time to finally quit this once great game for good. Sick and tired of Wargaming's garbage attitude as far as Submarines are concerned. Wargaming, WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO WAKE UP TO THE FACT THAT YOU WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO BALANCE SUBMARINES FAIRLY. I will NEVER play any sub or CV for that matter. You are driving many players away from this game with every garbage patch that you release.

I know that most of what I posted, was on about World of Tanks Account Boosting Services. But many of these web sites advertise World of Warships Account Boosting Services too. EG, if you Google "OVERTANK", you will find a web site that advertises WoT account boosting services. Services such as "I pay them some money, they play my account and get me an Excalibur Tank". Now, if you go look at their web site, you will find some World of Warships Services advertised. EG, pay them some money. Give them my account password, and they will pay my account and get me any tier 10 ship I want. Or, I pay them some money. Give them my account details and they can get me 12 million credits and 200k XP. Now, these services do concern World of Warships. They should concern the World of Warships development team. I reported the Overtank web site to the WoT Player Support back in 2016. My ticket was supposedly passed to the relevant department. But this web site is still up and running today and advertising World of Warships account boosting services. Shouldn't Wargaming be doing something about this problem?

Look pal, I am not going to have a pointless argument with you. I have reported it to Wargaming. Lets leave it at that.

Pretty sure that they could get them taken down.

Hi Seraphice, I want to draw your attention to an observation I found the other day. It concerns mainly in World of Tanks, but it does apply in Warships too. Claus Kellerman has done numerous Youtube videos recently concerning in game cheating. Namely, the many web sites out there that advertise to level your account for you, including completing missions. These web sites will promise to get you a tier 10 tank or ship, or complete the dockyard for you. They advertise these paying services for both World of Tanks and World of Warships. You pay them money and give them your account details and password. Then they will play your account to get the missions done etc. Claus Kellerman has engaged with some of these web sites via the chat help system they employ. He got them to admit that they would form platoons or divisions and rig battles to complete missions. EG they will form a platoon of tanks or ships. Then a player on the enemy team will farm damage from the platoon on the other side. So, 3 tanks or ships will do nothing for your team except be a damage magnet for the other guy on the other team. Off course all this is against Wargamings terms and conditions for World of Tanks and World of Warships. Now, what I want to know is WHY WARGAMING DOES NOTHING ABOUT THIS PROBLEM. I reported a web site called Overtank back in 2016 to Wargaming Player Support. My ticket was answered with a promise to pass my info onto the relevant department for action. Well, guess what, I reported this site back in 2016, yet the web site is still up and active today. They featured in Claus Kellerman's latest Youtube video about cheaters. Wargaming just do not care. Meanwhile genuine players games are being ruined by these cheaters, with nothing done to stop them. Can I suggest someone from Wargaming to go watch Claus's videos on cheaters.

Then why keep banging on about what I said? Plus why keep trying to twist what I said into something that I didn't say? I do agree with you though about the team make up screenshot posters in this thread. Like I have said multiple times. Its pointless complaining about team make up by player win rate, or any other stat for that matter. WARGAMING WILL NEVER BRING IN A SKILL BASED MATCHMAKER. By all means, complain about ship make up on the teams, or the number of DD's you got etc etc. But don't bother complaining to Wargaming about Skill Based Matchmaking. The complaints will fall on deaf ears.

There are no implications of my post. How is stating that even a poor player that plays 8 straight games with one ship, could get lucky and win 62% of those games? What is your problem with what I said?

So what. Is there a point to all your rhetoric?

Look, Bear posted a screenshot of a player who played 8 games in a Z 31, and got a 62% win rate over those 8 games. All I said was that even a poor player could get lucky and win 62% games out of 8 played. Now if that player had played say 50 straight games in a Z 31 and still got a 62% win rate over that many games. Then that would be more as a result of skill rather than luck. But you seem to be of the opinion, that you think I am banging on about some other subject that happens to include the word "LUCK". NOW THAT IS HARDLY MY PROBLEM.

But that has nothing to do with what I was stating pal.

I guess it just proves that you cannot read. You said: I did NOT say the results on that screen were the result of luck. I said: That statement has nothing to do with "ALL SCREENS". I just implied that any player can get lucky and win 62% of their games in the one ship. If they play that same ship for 8 games straight it can be easy to win 5 games out of those 8, if they happen to get good teams.

I didn't say that. Yet again, you get the facts wrong. I said even a poor player can get lucky and win 62% of the time out of 8 games played. Remember that you don't have to play well to win if the other players on your team happen to play well and carry the game for you. But now that Bear has shared the guys stats, we can see that that guy is a very good player indeed. So in his case, it probably wasn't down to luck.