piet11111

Detonations in my opinion only suck because they do not come with the explosive spectacle that they should have. If my ship goes up in a massive explosion that looks the part then i would be too much in a "WHOA" state to be grumpy about it.

I cant escape the impression he is chewing something while doing his lines. Also torpedoes sounds like torpedus.

turret rotation boost skill is better.

Well i personally think that the naming and shaming policy has got to go because this filth happens way too often the moderation of this game is simply not good enough to catch these cretins. Absolutely no disrespect to those tasked with moderating but to my knowledge nothing is done in-game and the report function might just as well be an illusion as far as i can tell. Seriously wargaming absolutely needs to start giving feedback to those who take the effort to report in game because without it it really seems pointless and as such not worth doing.

I see such filth in game enough to make me wonder why they do not have some kind of moderator-light that is able to chat-ban players in game. Someone is chat-banned this way it goes up for review and if required harsher punishment is dealt would work wonders for this game.

Its a very nice money maker and its also nice that when you play aggressively and everything works out ..... poorly then your not punished to the point where you feel you can never afford to play aggressively again. Of course being an iowa you still have to be careful about enemy's on the flanks but when your bow on i am not going to worry about credits and push in.

Just met dropsiq on trap with him in the enemy team in the minotaur while i was in the missouri. My team lemming trained to C while i was on the A end with only 1 dd going for that cap so i decided to support him. Managed to shoot down some divebombers to protect him but 2 yamato's showed up so i had to run but it was no use so i charged at them resulting in a crappy end of a battle i want to forget. edit: through a fantastic effort of our montana's we still managed to pull a win with the assist of a des moines and a fletcher.

Yup one days worth of work to get the euro's woe is me :-( (ok almost 2 days still better then making a job out of wows to get the free xp the hard way)

*grins* I think you have plenty free xp for that one :-P I will probably get the missouri when i get the "im rich" flag bundle for the graf spee and use the dubloons out of that package to convert.

Hmm i could just get the graf spee "i am rich" flag bundle and use those dubloons + buy whatever pocket change dubloons i come short with.

Hmm this does seem like a massive moneyprinter something i could definitely use since i tend to spend a ton of creds on modules and still need to buy the montana and the roon. also a radar

Might mo on the 8th of december for 750k free xp ! Still undecided what to do here.

Mighty mo is confirmed to be 750 k free xp and available on the 8th of december. http://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/common/mighty-mo-is-here/

Seems the update 0.5.15.1 for thursday announcement has been removed from the mainpage.

I still enjoy the Iowa but the missouri has better armor.

I dont know what i will do the thought of a ship that gets you a million credits with little effort is very tempting.

Not much time for me to look up what that convoy bit is about but any missouri news ?

Just ran into Dropsiq in an Akizuki and sonic_157 in an iowa our side won but i ran off with some proper kill stealing :-P

Hmm if you cant dig deeper anymore at least you can make the hole bigger.

It does take longer for a cruiser to kill a battleship but you are ignoring that cruisers have much more accurate guns that reload a lot faster as well. Cruisers if played right are a nightmare for any bb captain to have to deal with. BB's in my opinion are in a relatively well balanced position they are powerful when close to enemy ships but weak when fighting long range they are also very reliant on support far more so then other classes because they cant torpedo beat or run away like a cruiser or dd can.

Well this is highly problematic because its that fleet that runs off at first sight at the enemy and CV's are extremely rare to the point of irrelevance for balancing BB gameplay.

And yet if that same salvo misses i don't see any cruisers complaining that battleships reload to slow. You have a kutuzov use that long range for stealthy BBQ the odds of getting hit at the max kutuzov range is incredibly low.

This is my experience as well whenever i play BB i tend to push as much as i can but usually cruisers run off at the first sight of the enemy and the DD's that pop their smoke the moment they spot something leaving everyone blind. My position on this "camping BB" issue is that BB's simply can not rely on their team mates and are being conditioned to hang back.

While the tier 10 perma camo does make it hard to lose money i still make tons more in a tier 8 full premium ship. So i am not inclined to believe that the stats of a tier 10 perma camo amounts to the same bonuses that a premium ship would get. Do we have any hard numbers on what premium ship status actually does to a ship because to me the modifiers seem to be a lot different.

I too doubt radar is a big deal either cruisers are doing their job and it wont be used (experience says dream on) or the opponents are already sending their torpedoes and i reveal them just in time to see their evil grins. For the radar i would much rather have hydro.