Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

piet11111

Players
  • Content Сount

    2,225
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    8827
  • Clan

    [NED]

Everything posted by piet11111

  1. Well to be completely 100% fair i did not realize how awesome dindles where either until today so us euro-folk can not possibly blame you.
  2. To any and all outsiders this is internationalism at work people of all kinds of nationalities agreeing women look awesome in skimpy outfits. Anyone who disagrees is culturally insensitive and a bigot and all such bad things.
  3. A dindl is that dress thingy she is wearing ? If so definitely yes.
  4. Oh you glorious bastard to pm this is !!!
  5. Honestly i do not know where this thread is going but i damn well like it.
  6. Take that back british pin-up girls are the best !! (not sure if pin-up is the correct term anymore but damn it magazines like nuts and loaded deliver!)
  7. I do not care who owns amstel all i am saying is that heineken is disgusting to me. My grandfather owned a farm where he had woodchips around the chicken-coop and i clearly remember running about that place falling face down into those woodchips and having them in my mouth. The taste of those woodchips to me is 1-to-1 with Heineken beer i can not but hate that taste.
  8. Well since i took time off tomorrow because of the expected storm i am considerably inebriated at this point and i fail to find that particular beer in any dutch store via google i will continue this quest tomorrow/when i am sobered up.
  9. I really need to work on my UK beer's i havent even had Guinness :-(
  10. I would like to think us dutchies do rather well beer wise (though i do apologize for the bottled cow-urine we call heineken) But yeah belgium owns us my main beer is duvel my favorite is Deus brut des flandres and i love la chouffe (but its too expensive vs duvel otherwise it would be my main beer) my main dutch beer would definitely be Amstel. I really like the stronger beer the belgians make it doesnt drink away as quickly as regular beer where after a while i end up wondering where half that crate of 24 went.
  11. There will still be a "normal" camo for it but the kobayashi camo will almost certainly have a better bonus set. That is why i want it to be able to be toggled off without losing the bonus. Nothing is changed its just turned off. Otherwise if there is some contractual obligation of some sort then wargaming should offer regular camo's with the same bonus for free to the people who own a kobayashi camo. And if thats not an option because of the same contract then wargaming should look into getting new lawyers because they screwed up getting painted into a corner like that should that be the case.
  12. I just want to be able to equip such a camo and then turn of the visual aspect of it to its regular prem camo so i can keep using the kobayashi camo bonuses.
  13. piet11111

    Suggestions thread

    If you use the camo filter the Kobayashi camo is dismounted losing its bonuses. I would like for wargaming to adjust the toggle so the bonuses stay while the visuals are turned to a regular camo. Because frankly the Kobayashi camo's are just ugh but the benefits of them cant be ignored so easily. This way wargaming still gets money out of the kobayashi camo's but players have the consumer friendly choice of seeing them or not.
  14. So mushashi will be out next thursday looking forward to it.
  15. piet11111

    Some interesting info around the world

    Finally lovely tasty patch notes hmm whats this ? https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/updates/dasha-in-training-070/
  16. piet11111

    Musashi will cost 92... nope! 750k freePex !

    Now thats interesting because i cant find it so source please.
  17. piet11111

    Missouri or Musashi?

    Get the mo before she is gone !
  18. piet11111

    Musashi will cost 92... nope! 750k freePex !

    Because wargaming gives them a preview ship tells them when the NDA is lifted so they can get their content ready and then drops an unannounced change on them that makes all the work they put in outdated because its no longer the same ship.
  19. something something 300 spartans and yet some more something something
  20. I know your right but they can do a lot with detail sliders i hope. After-all this is not a commodore 64 released game.
  21. Well clearly i sexually identify as a battleship and anyone who disagrees is a bigot etc. But what i really mean with immersion is when graphics ingame correspond with what happens in reality like the newly introduced flame and smoke effects from primary and secondary guns. One of the biggest issues i have with graphics ingame is that anti-air is visually completely underwhelming i want to have the flakstorms that you can see from pacific theatre war-reels where sunny days are darkened by flak clouds to the point where you wonder if the sun is setting or nor. Same deal with smoke clouds where if you zoom in it just dissapears where you are left wondering just where you are shooting in front of a smoke screen inside of it or well behind it because visually you just cant tell. World of warships can do a lot more visually and i want to put pressure on them to do so because there clearly is room for improvement (just consider detonations they absolutely need to do something to make them visually interesting)
  22. I want to disagree with you so much because you said you want gimmicks to make up for its deficiency's but i cant possibly fault you for the rest. If its not for you then it simply is not for you. I will get the roma but i am also in doubt if its going to be a good ship.
  23. Littlewhitemouse still says its a good ship even with all its downsides.
×