piet11111

jeez whats going on ?

Apparently poorly because we cant get in yet

Still NA EULA looks dodgy AF.

I would be very interested in learning about this aswell. Though i doubt we will get much info about this due to "in development" status.

These are the kind of missions i love thanks @MrConway @Crysantos

never sell a tier X ship even if it sucks. They at one point gave out dragon flags for every tier X ship you had who knows when they might do that again.

The skill also reduces the amount of firest your ship can have from 4 to 3 so that can be a lifesaver and the time reduction that it lasts is just a sweet extra.

I doubt it would make much of a difference if all secondaries use HE though it would be a quality of life improvement. I would be pleased to see such a change.

Oh yeah that could also be it.

Birthday camo ?

Im not sure if Mrconway means the dubloon bought permaflage but the wierd Muricah camo

Notser raises some really good points there and i agree fully with him. Fixing the XP system is the only way to really deal with unwanted meta and reward risky yet team supporting behavior.

Damn i should have known this yesterday.

What a delicate little flower you must be to throw a hissy fit over old ships finally being brought to everyone that would want to pay for them. i would be surprised if 10% of the people that have them even play them on a regular basis anymore.

Non beta versions of ships like the Arkensas would be fantastic. Make it happen !

Same for me. Also the toxicity i see in game is 90% among team members and backseat-captaining so the removal of talking to the enemy would not be a real solution. Kinda shocking to see people here defending the "right to criticise" because either they are oblivious to what this thread is actually about or they are the people who cause this toxicity.

I would not be surprised if it end up being taken away at some point but i would blame wargaming for that because they seem to want to rely on the report system way to much.

At times i think those reports are like office thermostats meaning they are there to give the people that use them an impression that it works but they really dont. The times you see people raging in chat over little things makes me wonder how if they act that way they are not serving a chatban. But then you see people on these forums complaining about chatbans swearing high and low they have been perfect little angels and that gives me the impression that reports actually do work but are then incredibly prone to abuse. I would really hate it if this game went down the same road as world of tanks where wargaming flatout ignored the problem until they had to remove the ability to chat to the enemy team. (and yes wargaming employees would probably say thats not what happened but its the impression i got when i saw toxic chatbehaviour increasing over time)

I would actually love to see ingame moderating where certain players are able to hand out chat-bans ingame. Heck i would volunteer to do that.

Player choice with a proper toggle those who want it like you can keep using them and those who don't (seemingly everyone else in this thread) have the choice to toggle them off. I am glad to see this request gaining more traction especially now that more and more circuses are losing their tents. (i like that one going to steal it)

Tanatoy just lock this thread this cant be recovered.

Must say i am kinda curious about the results of others in the Hood my 6 kills cant be that exceptional can they ?

Oops im wrong i got 6 in the Hood. 7 In my kutuzov Also 7 in my kamikaze and the Vampire

7 in the Hood.

Every bit of player customization helps. Overall i like the way the game is developing but the forced cartoonish camo's is something i find highly annoying even more so when i am faced with a camouflage that has fantastic bonuses to credit and xp income but its looks like something that would never be used on a real ship.