thiextar

Ah, I was on the phone, so thats probably why I didn't notice

Wut? I just copy pasted the code from reddit, and wrote the rest normally. I didn't touch any formatting options?

Yes it does have better credit income. Des Moines is the better ship, atleast for competative. The 10 km radar allows des Moines to cover caps from behind islands, Salem cannot do this, thus salem is useless in cb for example. I'm sure the stronger heal could make salem work in random, but it will never be good in competitive.

By doing that you might aswell actively be trying to kill your teammates. Honestly that should count as team killing.

NO. JUST No. Never say yes to anything unless you intend to go through with it. There's not much carriers can do to protect surface ships, but if you say yes when someone asks for air support, that player will play as if he's now safe from air. There's nothing more annoying than telling everyone to push somewhere together, everyone says "wilco", you start pushing, and no one follows you. Stop lying in chat, please everyone. There is a "no" command, use it if you cant/won't comply with a request.

Use aslains modpack...

Yup, carrier matches are absolutely horrendosly boring in ranked, but even worse, they make it next to impossible to save a star without camping the border every game, because they always die last, and do a ton of damage, they are nearly always the ones who gets to save stars. I have resorted to a simple system of click battle, checking for carriers in the queue, and if there are any, spam escape back to port. After 10 seconds, try again. Usually works for getting carrier free matches after 2 or 3 attempts, only way to make this season bearable. Will probably make a bot to automate the process soon, as im lazy.

Hmmmm, let me check no

How do i block people on the forum? Also looking to block veslingr, but didnt know there was a bock function on the forum?

When you can kill 4 of your supposed counter ships, which are probably all aa-specced, that is a problem, no matter how many planes you lost lol.

And you dont find anything problematic with that?

IIf its pick'n'mix, its a very low kilo price.

No. This is the worst state the game has been in for over a year. Bad time to come back.

So the latest publication on the warships devblog reveals that the next ranked season will be tier 10, and we will have carriers in it... I really do not believe that carriers fits in a 7vs7 competitive format at all, they will be absolutely dominating, and they will stop any form of active play. Anyways, i was looking forward to the new ranked season, but if carriers are gonna be in it, im out. What are you guys opinions of this?

Maybe it will atleast show wargaming how broken carriers are... But knowing wargaming, i doubt they will do anything with that information.

Its not 6x2, its 3x2 380mm turrets

I never stated such a thing. Learn the difference between soft-cap and hard-cap. Anyways, i stopped engaging with you months ago, because you lack any logical thinking.

No, of course softcap is possible... There is no reason for a softcap to cause any problems, because as soon as too many are in the queue, it will just start matches with 2 carriers to compensate, no mathematical issues there... Whats impossible is a hard-cap as long as the carrier playerbase for that tier is above 9% of the total ships entering battle. Simple maths.

So wargaming states that because of the changes in 8.4 Carriers are now ready for ranked battles, but the only thing that was changed was a sidegrade to divebombers????? When they originally came out with this, we were also supposed to get reworked aa skills and sector management AND a start delay in 8.4, nothing of this happened.... @MrConway @Sub_Octavian Since you didnt make any of the major changes you said you would, how can you still say that carriers will be ready for ranked?

You just wanted to put "tits" in the title, didnt you?

As for adding the file association, a quick googling led me to this: https://superuser.com/questions/1080453/adding-or-registering-a-file-type-so-it-can-be-associated-with-an-application

It is in your main worldofwarships installation folder, its called "WorldOfWarships.exe", the path to it will be similar to this: "C:\games\World_of_Warships\WorldOfWarships.exe" You must have this file, because otherwise your game wouldnt start at all.

So you havent tried manually opening the replay with the exe file? Cause that is what you need to do if for some reason, the replay files didnt get assigned the exe as default.

I mean, its the exact same system, just that world of tanks saves unlimited replays by default, wows saves 30 by default. Thats the only difference. Having to enable replays in the game files has been a thing of the past for months now... And if you want to save unlimited replays, you just change a value in a config file, super simple...

They do have the same replay systema cross all of its games tho... The wot replay system works exactly like the wows replay system... Out of curiosity, are you using Microsoft store or steam or something like that to run warships?