thiextar
-
Content Сount
3,503 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
9933 -
Clan
[-AP-]
Everything posted by thiextar
-
Me? <3
-
Looking at the current state of CV rework, there is no way to avoid it really. Get a flooding, repair it, get another flooding Or Get a flooding, hold the repair until you die, while the torp bombers just look at you evily
-
Op, was any of my guesses close?
-
That by placing giant focusing mirrors by the sun, we could fire a giant laser at a spaceship equipped with a solar sail to achieve the velocities necessary for interstellar travel.
-
Holy, guacamole, I just realised it. Obviously you were thinking of what you were doing at the time. You were thinking about giving up to 10k Doubloons to the guy who could guess what you were thinking.
-
"Alaska" seen in the wild... possibly/hopefully next FreeXP ship... I hope...
thiextar replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
This is war gaming's new tactic tho, make the new prem crap, so the community asks for a buff, so that they can make it op and then blame it on us. -
You were thinking what the new cv skills will be You were thinking if we would get free captain skill retrains for all captains once the cv rework is out
-
You are thinking that a three man div of cvs can systematically delete one ship at a time together until there is nothing left on the enemy team with little effort
-
You are thinking how the forum will welcome the new carriers? You are thinking of potential new cv lines/line? You are thinking that low range aa will now be better than mid/long ranged aa you are thinking that the cv rework stream had zero professionality to it. You are thinking about any of the things about cvs that wasnt in the presentation
-
Shima hit me with a volley of 13k+ HE
thiextar replied to anonym_RGvUdEcxWWvD's topic in General Discussion
doesnt work like that -
Shima hit me with a volley of 13k+ HE
thiextar replied to anonym_RGvUdEcxWWvD's topic in General Discussion
Which is completely impossible because all calculations are made server-side. -
Can you tell me if i got close?
-
That stacking dots with torp drops from cv rework will be op farazelleth Yamato 460mm firework aa A pink rubber duck an African swallow and a European swallow could carry a 1 pound coconut together using a rope between the dorsal guiding feathers? spitfire Some really cool fighter plane
-
Some half naked/naked girl flamu farahnja, whatever his name is, the cv youtuber space battleship yamato a chicken wearing a hat a 2080ti a yellow hippo with blue dots The spanish inquisition? how many guesses do i get?
-
The mighty jingles in underpants!
-
But adrenaline rush is already a god tier pick for nearly all ships, why would it need a buff?
-
"Alaska" seen in the wild... possibly/hopefully next FreeXP ship... I hope...
thiextar replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
Flamu just started a stream with the alaska amongst other things: https://www.twitch.tv/flamuu -
"Alaska" seen in the wild... possibly/hopefully next FreeXP ship... I hope...
thiextar replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
The issue at this point is that we are starting to desperately need a battle cruiser class -
"Alaska" seen in the wild... possibly/hopefully next FreeXP ship... I hope...
thiextar replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
Just had a game with a wargaming fella playing an alaska, i can post the replay if anyone is super interested, but i didnt spend much time looking at the alaska tho -
These are the stats of the stalingrad, collected only from the top 5% of players, in comparison to the rest of the t10 cruisers. The numbers speak from themselves. Source: https://wows-numbers.com/ship/3760109008,Stalingrad/
- 69 replies
-
- 5
-
-
- stalingrad
- worcester
- (and 7 more)
-
Except that if you look at cruiser balance from stats gathered by only the top 5% of players in this game, the stalingrad still tops the chart, and there has been a million very serious arguments made about why the stalingrad is overpowered, its just that stalingrad owners dont seem to close their eyes, put their hands over their ears and yell NANANANANANANA whenever they see such an argument.
- 69 replies
-
- 4
-
-
-
- stalingrad
- worcester
- (and 7 more)
-
Except his right about the ship being op, because the stats show it as a fact. Who would have thought that a ship with battleship guns, russian railgun velocity, american piercing angles, and cruiser dispersion would be op? Its almost like it didnt get a combination of all the best national/class gun traits in the game?
-
heres to everyone that said stalingrad will never see competitive play. Taken from the wows tourney that ran today.
- 69 replies
-
- 3
-
-
- stalingrad
- worcester
- (and 7 more)
-
Issue with stalingrad is that it gets completely broken ap, which would be somewhat fine if it didnt have he, thus making it highly situational, the way it currently is, is just stupid.
-
oh, cheers
