SkipperCH

Removed 1 post for insults

Since the topic already exists I'm closing it down here. Closed

2 Beiträge wegen Provokationen entfernt.

Removed 2 posts for OT.

Es gibt doch T11 Träger. Und EP zur Erforschung würden sogar finanziell gesehen sogar Sinn machen, da einige Leute umwandeln und somit Geld ausgeben müssten/würden. Das ist noch offen, aber ich nehme an dass es minimale Auswirkungen auf die Ökonomie nehmen dürfte (ähnlich dem Forschungsgebäude) Es ist eine Ausrichtung dahin was T10 eigentlich hätte sein sollen. Eine Veränderung, die schlechte Spieler zwingt entweder LowTier zu farmen um sich T-11 Runden leisten zu können, Credits zu kaufen um dies nicht tun zu müssen, oder eben auf T-11 zu verzichten. Eben so wie es bei WoT läuft. T-10 ist da Minusgeschäft wenn man nicht gerade gut spielt, oder Booster an hat. Das Super vor den Schiffen kannst du dir in sofern wegdenken, dass es eben schlicht T-11 ist. So wie sie eben auch in den Gamefiles betitelt werden. Und zur Zeit ist die Antwort auf deine Frage folgende:

Since this is all you wanted to say I shall lock this. Closed

I don't see the problem... Ganz einfach. Vor allem dürfte die Betitelung T-11 erst dann kommen wenn alle Bäume ein entsprechendes Schiff bekommen haben. Dass sie z.B. keine XÜ kosten finde ich seltsam, aber heißt ja nicht dass es nicht noch kommen kann.

Kaga. Hornet is just for her historical significance and the ability to devstrike DD‘s with the B-25‘s

Republique Grozovoi Des Moines

Er meint vermutlich den alternativen Feuermodus.

Es sind T-11 Schiffe. Ihr Sinn ist, dass sie stärker sind als T-10 Schiffe. Ganz einfach.

It might be, but I doubt it. This cut might bring some change. It can but not necessarily. Regarding balance or new content. I don't have a crystal ball to see into the future, but I guess there will be less new content in the upcoming second half of the year while WG is building up an own new gamestudio somewhere else. While Lesta keeps doing what they're doing. And since they are no longer bound to the european/western market they will most likely also go down a different patch with balance, monetization, and content. And as soon as this happens the game versions will split, making "crossplay" between servers impossible.

Eine weitere Test Iteration. Wie die vorigen 8 ebenfalls.

This isn't how it will happen. Since WG also closed down their main studio in Minsk. Which has to be replaced somewhere else and I don't think that there is "a way back" after this step.

The following is a personal opinion and not approved by WG. I guess that WG will treat it this way. As soon as WG has either moved enough personell from Russia to wherever they build up their new development studio they will remove all development from Lesta. From then on I guess the CIS server will be cut off from the others. And development may differ from then on.

For recommendations I would rather listen to someone who played many rounds throughout testing than someone who makes his statement based on 6 rounds.

Okay, then let's simply disproof your initial statement that Hornet planes are glass canons. Hornets Douglas TBD Devastator Torpedo Bombers have 1.720 HP base - Now let's have a look what other T8 CV planes have (I will just use the top planes to further proof my point) Kaga - 1.600HP Shokaku - 1.670HP Chkalov - 1.470HP Pobeda - 1.470HP Enterprise - 1.800HP Lexington - 1.880HP Saipan - 2.040HP August v. Parseval 1.570HP Graf Zeppelin - 1.710HP Implacable - 2.150HP Aquila - 1.150HP So....now tell me why exactly Hornets planes should be considered glass canons if their HP is the fifth highest of it's tier? Since you like statistics so much. HP isn't equal to survivability as well. FdR's planes have the highest HP but will likewise take the most dmg due to their poor maneuverability. Same is true for Implacables planes. High HP won't save you if you hit flak explosions due to lack of mobility.

Then you've got 2 options stop making claims that supertesters don't know what they're talking about apply for supertesting and proof that you yourself know what you're talking about

So this is a Photoshop edit then? Or this? Or maybe this? I could go on and on. So please - Either you stick to your own opinion and own anything you said or you should rethink before posting. Especially if something gets saved and can be checked afterwards to proof is disproof your statements.

I re-read the conversation from discord and to be honest - You brought this on yourself. Ranting and stating your personal opinion as the one and only isn't the way to go.

Im Bereich von Zerstörern ist mit die Technik von Halland, Friesland & Co. deutlich lieber als die der Zerstörer, die über Heck abwerfen. Und U-Boot und Zerstörer sind füreinander gegenseitig die größten Gefahren. Denn idR. ist der Zerstörer der einzige der nah genug ranfährt um das U-Boot zu spotten. Bzgl. des ASW Balancings - Dass da noch etwas getan werden muss ist verständlich, aber es ist auch noch kein echter U-Boot Release abzusehen.

You said it "opinion". If you think you would be a better supertester I suggest you apply for it. And you're talking about a ship you played for 6 rounds until now and are performing below average. Supertesters (me included) usually have around 100 rounds of playing a ship before it gets released. So there usually is a funded opinion made throughout these rounds. That you have a different opinion is okay, but do not try to argue that just because someone has a different opinion than you he has no idea what he is talking about. The Community discord helped way more people than you ever did who is now criticizing. @ColonelPete - Look at the amount of games.

Removed 3 posts for politics.

Anti Submarine Weapon

Wenn du derlei Probleme öfter hast kannst du den PingPlotter mal nutzen um zu schauen wo die Verbindung zum Server genau abbricht - Ob es deine Seite ist, oder irgendwo auf dem Weg zu den Servern.