Fastmotion

So, you agree that your 42 is not important in Wows context. By my rules posting a link isn ot allowed so i apologies but this link describes better the significance than your text in my opinion and it is not only for the English speaking world but for the whole universe: "42: The answer to life, the universe and everything" https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/history/42-the-answer-to-life-the-universe-and-everything-2205734.html You can make a separate thread about it.

What do you mean? Facts are not wonderful but are believes in the dream-world if t osay so. There are no 100% sure things if the world has at least one unsure thing. For example the world don't understand the quantum ideas and many other ideas but those ideas are connected to all other knowledge. The 2+2 is not 4 by a fact therefore. Is there anything wonderful that it is a 99% sure "fact"? No. Are facts actually 99% true or 0%- the latter one if you wish to look from higher perspectives. But what do you mean with your message? And can you make a separate thread where peopel talk about it? I for example stay i nthe topic always, answer all arguments and win al ldebates. Why? Mainly because i follow adequate methods.

Plain numbers don't have any significance and nay meaning. Just like spam images have no clear meaning. I made an exam question to people with a number in another thread by asking a 4-digit number. All who have any knowledge would have answered to that question but noone did. I illustrated with that question that peoples stats don't give them knowledge and don't make them win debates. My 4-digit number has really a value in this game. But 42 - no.

We disagree with opinions about that battle. I think we can make a different topic and analyze many replays there. Additionally you mention T11 ships. For that i say that most of your hive believes that T11 ships are overpowered but they still use it which proves that they support hipocritically overp owered ships. You don't have to agree with that opinion either. But i don't see any point of starting a debate here again. Make a separate thread about replays and arguments and i can come and win again there. Because it is so obvious for me that you have a wrong opinion there. It will bea short proof and victory like in todays others argumentations.

no it didn't. You didn't understand it probably and you can't probably define terms like internet Spam very clearly. You can make a separate threadwhere we analyze that video.

That image proves that Subs are most of the times harmless. Don't you agree? The same is with CVs. We can analyze replays and compare them with the arguments. I suggest we do as we started in the other thread that 2 persons posted 5 battles and we analyzed how often Subs appear and so on.

You opinion is expected and typical. Once you loose al larguments you say that the opponent is fat or wrong. Next steps is to say that the opponent is not mentally healthy and the last step is to silence him. In real life some countries silence journalists many different way. For example journalists disappear or have a car accident. Can we agree that your such opinions are offtopical and unconstructive?

i repeat that spam is and inadequate and can be interpretead thousands ways. Therefore there is nothing to comment. Which arguments you have and where? I understood that moderators and one person also agreed with thatearlier somehwere here and thay decided to stop posting dog images. So, many people take spam and otherinadequate methods as an unconstructive and not healthy things. Ususally such methods are common to propaganda/brainawash sociums. If provided a link where you can go and try to represent your arguments if you think that you are capable from your hide. Others in your hive failed. go and try and good luck. Why do you assume that peopel are not in the wild already now? And why do you think that there is any wild and opportunity to go? And why do you suggest? You can pick any random suggestions fro mthis forum or any random spam picture as a suggestion to you and enjoy it. Does that seal prove that pork and Subs and the word War are bad? Or which theories and arguments it proves? I repeat the unanswered question: what is that Skybuck and if it is a person who did something wrong then provide a proof for that. His posting history doesn't show anything wrong to me. If you plan to title your opponents with some kind of pictures and phrases on it then this is a typical expected step and go ahead. You can put it or any other picture to my accounts avatar picture i don't mind.

You can go and add additional inputs to the topic where you lost the argumentation. You provided there you mathematical stuff and got a counter-question and you failed to respond to that. There isa vry clear and adequate debate where everyone understand each others statements very clearly.

No, there is a proof where a person made a false statement using a number 150. It became false because an adequate proof was given and nobody including you couldn't say anything against that proof. Additionally, you made i nthe process there a statement that i am not able to prove something and tried to support the 150 idea. You failed in both that things and left without giving any adequate response. There is no my twist there or anything inadequate but a clear proof like i always provide.

I proved that you are wrong in that topic: There is aclear professional debate where i show that you andone other person are wrong. So, there is no point to deny it and no point to add other false opinions. You can still go there and try to answer the counter-question that was given to you.

I have already answered to that and all other questions earlier. But you haven't given an adequate answer to my suggestion to stay in the topics. for example this time you added an offtopical answered question here to my suggestion. And your such response is not an adequate answer and even is something opposite that i suggested. This is a proof that your hive most of the times are inadequate. Should i repeat here again that let's stay in the topic or this thread will be closed again by your hives inadequate behaviour.

We can plan some contests/exams in the gold league in the future. But i hope that you don't take such battle events as an adequate method to prove your hives defeated arguments.

So you explain that if he blocks me then it affects him and not me. That is the same what i said. I already said that what should i do with his announcement of blocking someone. Can you answer that question too or you prefer to ignore the question? The question was i nthe phrase with "..how or is an important offtopical info for me? ", so, what should the world do with an info that he blocked me. Should i start to loose money or gain more money or what? What is the point to spreadsuch irrelevant offtopical idea? Can you explain that? Hesaid to me that he blocks something so it is about me and for me what he said. That proves that your last sentence is wrong where you want to think that he was not talking to me. Do you have anything to add about this topic like i did earlier and like i have done in all topics or you just are off topic like most of the times?

i don't understand how it improves anything just like me and other adequate peopel don't understand your hives believes and attitudes. In this thread and all others i came and posted my opinion and there became argumentations that i won in all of them. Of cause you deny that because denial is a typical inadequate method common to brainwashed sociums. If you one day want to try to prove again someting then you are welcomed. But can you do it in proper topics?

How to interpret you such sentence and other spam you made? There is nothing adequate in your post. You seem to strike through some sentences. Why don't you change the color aswell and add chinexe symbols between words?

it does not matter what your hive member automatically answers to your questions. In some sociums you can ask "Yo comrade, did you understand my proof about pork and the word War?". The answer will obviously be automatic Yes. Do you think such question and answer is adequate? No. I saw in one topic a faulty Subs questionnaire and people there told that WG made similar questionnaire with opposing results. I asked them that can they show me that WG's one but they failed to answer like usual. I beleive that WG's questionnaire is adequate. I repeat that i asked people to provide definitions and explanations to things and terms and they provided different opposing answers. Also about spam. I provided clear explanations that there is no single way to understand spam. Some people accidentally have sometimes similar understanding of a picture. But even then if you try to go to the details then they all have some different understanding there. Even in strongly brainwashed communities people cannot think 100% same way. You can't expect that a symbol, image, color, apple, dog can give the same thoughts to all people. Art is an example where people look art pictures and all interpret differently. In professional environments like courts you cannot walk in and show a picture of a dog and apple and believe that people would get a clear one understanding of your message. They stop you and ask why do you use inadequate methods. In this thread i came and explained very clearly my opinion and partially other people had the same opinion. Now you are offtopic and loosing arguments because your hive cannot accept that someone thinks partially different way than them.

No they don't and i explained well enough. And the problem is because spam is an inadequate tool.

So, you failed to prove your and his statements. His statement with the number 150 didn't stay valid and your statement that i can't prove something also became invalid. And you failed to reply to my simple counter-questions as your hive usually do. I answer to almost everything o nthe other hand. I repeat that it is totally expected that your next steps are to say that your opponent is mad, andfinally block him. But you can never provide any proofs to your hive's beliefs. I suggest that go read again that statement with the number 150. And don't feel suffer if your hives believes are debunked sometimes. It is normal that we all make mistakes sometimes.

Yes, there was a video about a spam topic earlier and yes it didn't explain what is an internet spam. But there was plenty of other spam pictures that didn't have anything healty or right. If you think that spam can somehow prove 1000 ways some points then pick any random spam above and that proves that you are wrong. In this topic i came and said my opinion about the topic but your hive including you started to be offtopic like your current post because your hive acts like robots if they see a not allowed opinion or not allowed ship type. I repeat that i don't understand the numbers and text on your image and the main reason is that spam images have no adequate one meaning. There is no adequate way to understand what that image means and therefore you skip to read the numbers and other symbols of the image. I don't understand what you mean by that. I repeat that if i skipped some questions then show them and i will answer. But i myself can show plenty of examples where your hive are not able to answer. So, you repeat to assume things and fail to provide definitions to terms. I don't think that your assumtions are right but you can try to proove them. I explained well why spam images are not adequate.

I don't understand your image and i don't take it as an adequate behaviour. Under the image you say that it may be interpreted as racism. I agree with that andi add that it can be interpreted many other ways and it is silly to assume that all people interpret that image exactly the same way. I can give you other todays images to interpret, for example a dog image. Secondly, you failed to provide any counter-responses to my statements. The only thing you introduced was that i said something Worst somewhere. I agree that whoever said something first should get answers first. If so then i can show plenty of examples where your hive fails to follow that suggestion. If you show which things i didn't answer then show and i will answer. But have you yourself answered everything. I asked earlier from people to define the term Spam, Arcade, etc and they failed. You say that you know the definition of the spam but i don't. Why do you assume so? And what is the point of assumtions?

How does it affect me if you block me or put me in your colored lists? In my clan the rules about it are: 1) it is forbidden to put people to colored lists 2) it is forbidden to report, block or silence other ways people. Therefore i never block anybody and i don't actually know how to do it. But i don't understand why do you have an illusion that it affects me somehow or is an important offtopical info for me? Idon't care what you do and which rules you follow. If colored lists and other blocking lowers temporarily your sufferings then go ahead. I personally don't believe that your pain andsuffer fades that way.

You say an opinion that i don't provide proofs but i say a fact that i remember providing always proofs and adequate explanations. I don't ignore questions unless there is really too many questions. I don't post spam and don't use inadequate methods. When i disagree with something then i explain adequately. But you don't seem to have proofs you just say an opinion that i don't proove things. I disagree and it is your job to prove your statement not mine to provide an opposite proof. You say that sometimes i ginore some questions and say that the opponent is inadequate. That happens if the opponent posts spam and other inadequate things or repeats defeated arguments or fails to answer my first questions first, etc. But i have many timesm ore example for you when your hive ignores my questions. So, if you don't like that i react sometimes with not answering then you can address first that complains to your hive and yourself. You say that i use answer like "trust me". That is a lie because trusting and other blind believes are not adequate methods and i don't believe in them. Can you show where have i used such trust-suggestions? I can surely provide such examples from your hive. You seem to approve spam images. I have already given explanations to them and other arguments earlier somewhere. Seems like you approve spam and say that everyone understands it. First, it is common that a brainwashed socium believes that all other people in the universe thinks like their hive. But in reality you can't prove that people understands spam images the same way. Which proof you would use. Today for example i saw a dog picture in this forum and asked what it means and didn't get any answer- that proves that such images are not understood by everyone. When i asked people to define how spam images are helpful and can you define their porpose then i got many different opposing defintions. 2 people fro mthe hive said that spam pictures can be interpreted 1000 ways, others said that pictures show 1 concrete emotions to everyone, some said that pictures are meant to show that they disagree. Well, all those faulty definitions prove that there is no good of the spam and no way that everyone understands them the same way. I remember i provide usually a counter-question: if you support spam images then pick any random above and that picture is a proof that you are wrong and lost your arguments. Because spam images can be interpreted 1000 ways and why not you pick one and the result is as i explained. At the end you say "kind of" that agrees with me partially. It is fine that we don't agree fully.

If a ship existed only on a paper in real life then those ships can be created today and they would operate like other ships in life and they would operate i nthe game 99.8% the same. Some games may show an apple which is half red and has other unique details. In the real world you don't have exactly such apple but in the game you have and it feels real like apples look. Do you think that this apple and soviet ships are unreal because you can't see them today in the real world? No, you think that the apple and Soviet ships are totally real. I remember i already explained that health bars are totally fine things in computers and exists in all games. Do you say that all computer software is unreal then because they have buttons and health bars? No. About the term Arcade i don't have issues i just asked you to define it but you failed like in most argumentations peopel ignore questions/arguments. I believe that the term is bad and better not to use it. But a word unreal looks better. Your opinion is common to your hive. When your league has no arguments left then they try to say that the opponent is fat or mad etc. But such opinions/attitudes are inadequate and a typical expected behaviour. And they cause sufferings to your hive andn ot to me. For me it is a joy to enlighten the world. Also in some countries journalists are silenced with 3-steps. The first step is to say that they lie, then prohibit them to write, then say that they are mad, and final step is to erase them. But they don't provide any adequate proofs because they don't have it. They just want to keep their propaganda lies go on. I hope such example is also educational and good.

You say that you gave facts and particularly you gave a "fact" that Soviet ships i nthe game are far from real. How is that true that those or any other ships are unreal? and how can you call such unproven statements as facts? Can you show where is written a fact that those ships are unreal? Later you try to explain your "facts" and say that Soviet ships have somehow different armor in the real life and in the game and that i nthe real life Soviet ships are not so mighty like i nthe game. Armor differences are not an argument that makes a game far from real. Firstly, you have to anyway make changes in the computer world when you show/model the real world. For example in the computer screen a tree looks ca 2cm long but in the real life 2 meters. That doesn't mean that the computerized tree is unreal or far from reality. Ships have armor in this game and also in real life. If some ships have in the game little bit weaker armor compared to other ships then this irrelevant detail doesn't make the game feel somehow far from reality. In the real world some things may not be playable and that's why those are little bit changed but the goal of that game is not to be a 100% accurate model of the real world for the scientists to study but rather a 99.8% similar simulation for players to play. Armor differences/details make that game 0.2% different from the real life but would you say that if 99.8% things are like in the real world then such thing is unreal or Arcade? I don't see it to be reasonable to call something unreal because such details.