Fastmotion

I proved also that the popular delusion argument is wrong. I explained that and evrything else very clearly and didn't get any arguments against so you don't need to repeat old defeated arguments. Seconfly, my rules are accepted indeed widely. And i explained that if you disagree with that fact then we follow your league rules and say that any spam image above proves that you are wrong.

I already linked plenty of times things and went through many Yes-No-Yes-No inadequate dialogues with your league mates. I link and answer after you prove that you are adequate by qualifying in the simple exam that i gave. Beside answering everything i started an experiemnt where we al ltogether started to answer to 3 Sub-related questions by posting 3 images. We can continue those challengies and go again through all 20 argument but not in this forum and not with unqualified people. So, i don't link anything naymore. If you have an opinion that one should link then answer to your opinions is by your league that just look a spam image and understand that you are wrong and the argumentation over and no need for links or anything.

Yes i did and i there is a proof about it and about everything i have said.

Here it is impossible and the proof is that we failed already on the qualification round.

Yes, i did.

Why do you think that i am not the one who defines the rules/frame for the debate? I was aksed for the debate and i set my rules for that and those rules are widely accepted and very close to the court rules. Also i said that we all agree first those rules and we can do that in any sutable forum not only in mine. Also you mention that i don't decide other things. Well, if you have 2 apples on the left and2 on the right thenwhoshould decide that there are 4 in total and not 5? Both me and you can decide but i take that role to myself because we proved that i am adequate and i am the one who sets conditions this is the payment your league has to make. Why you wan tto get something for free? There is no problem that i decide the rules and ensure that those are followed.

i already represented and you can look the details where i represented the exam and what i commented later. If you don't agree with something or have questions thenyou can look at any random spam images in this topic and by your league those images answer your opinions and also proves that you are wrong.

Your forum might suit as well, i don't mind any forum that can prove that they are adequate.

If you have some opinions abou tthe qualification round then first go complete it. And give your explanation to the conclusion there. The conclusion there can be done by anyone, it does not actually need a person. It is like 4 apples are on the table and there is no need to count and tell loudly "4" because it is obvious. The same obvious result came from the qualification.

I'm not sure if you understood fully. My forum has rules like you have in the court and we all say in the beginning there that we agree with the rules and agree that who posts a spam will get the spam post deleted. My and the court rules are adequate and here the rules are not. People here said basically that a spam image is an argumentation tool that proves for example who is right and wins the argumentation. So, if you agree with such inadequate rules here then we already proved that your league lost the argumentation because any spam image above is a tool to prove that. So, my forum is needed because it has reasonable rules which disables for example such "yes,no,yes,no" dialogue that your league practiced. If you want to support such YesNo method then let me just say "Yes, you lost here" and you reply "No, we didnt" and i say Yes and so on. Does it lead to anywhere? No, therefore we need adequate forum with adequate skills. That's why one must also pass the qualification round. I gave ca 5 steps instruction which ends with a step "Suffering ends".

but can you explain as i did? I explained why forum is better. You didn't. I explained everything and answered everything and represented 20 arguments, but you didn't.

Ialready presented by givind 2 questions which i call together a Qualification exam.

You try to tell that your opponent makes grammar mistakes or some other details about language but those details are not adequate. If you want to say that grammar decides whose arguments win then we see in your haters league grammar mistakes and such things too and that defines that your league lost agai nthe argumentation. Therefore it is not important which font people use or which dialect and other irrelevant details are worthless. Secondly, as you see that people have proved that they have been able to do a conversation with me for 10 pages at least. That proves again that your grammar argument is wrong. I suggest to answer first to the qualification questions to prove that you are adequate and those questions are in the topic they lead to subs and support the argument number 2 and 18.

You try to predict that in my forum there would be inadequancy like here. First of all, predictions fail and secondly i explained that we agree there first that we don't spam and so on. So, my forum is a good solution because there your league don't have to be afraid mods and just follow the rules that we al ltogether agree first.

Your opinions are mostly denials and without any proof that leaded to a situation that there were only 2 conclusions left which both say that you and your league lost the argumentation. If you wan to disagree then first be adequate or pick any random spam image above that proves that you are wrong in 1000 ways.

I gave an adequate explanation why my forum is appropriate.

First we proved a fact that you and your league can't answer simple questions and that makes you inadequate. If now an indequate person has an opinion that i can't answer something then my first reply is that try to qualify first otherwise i don't believe your opinions and won't even read them. You can pick any spam image from above as an answer to your question. Or just interpret that those spam images declare 1000 ways that your league lost the argumentation.

If you are suffering and are afraid that the topic will be closed then i remind you that i explained earlier: 1. spamming and offtopic and other your league methods are inadequate and cause the topic to be closed sooner or later. 2. Come to my forum that doesn't have such inadequance. And you believed they won't close. Well, now you seem to change your mind. I posted you a recipe how you can get rid of your suffering.

I reprersented a clear explanation. If you didn't understand then this this is because we proved that you are inadequate. You deny everything and fail to answer the arguments and lost the argumentation. That's why you don't understand things and have no proofs and end up with yes-no-yes-no dialogue. I won't explain you the thing you ask about that text because first you have to qualify that you are adequate. Otherwise pick any of the random spam images from abouve to be an answer to you. This is your position i nthe qualification round that spam is so appropriate that it answers thousnad things and thousand ways.

Yes i qualified. My answers to the warmup question were that posting spam is inadequate and equals a loss in argumentation. In the real life in the court the idea is the same. If one starts to respond with offtopical gestures or pictures to questions then he is put to the prison.

You are wrong if you think that only 1 party in the argumentation asks questions. No, both sides represent their listing of arguments and start to ask questions under each argument. For example i represented 20 arguments and asked in the argument 1 a question that your league failed to answer and instead they asked me to guide them in the 20 argument listings and asked other things. That all proves that both sides ask and you were wrong if you think that only i as the winning side had to ask. You mention that you can respond to something. Can you prove that you can adequately respond to the qualification questions? If you qualify there then i wil lanswer to your ideas.

Can you qualify first which proves that you are adequate to ask and answer? Go and answer to the warmup spam question and to the the Brothers example. You leagues other comrade ended up in there so that the concusion is that your league failed. Go and show that you can do better than him. After you qualify you can ask me questions. If you fail to qualify then choose any of the above spam images as an answer to you and that image proves that you are wrong.

You say that i got many responses but i proved that i didnt get valid responses and your league failed with even the warmup question and and the argument 1 so we didn't proceed. You don't qualify and therefore there is no point to explain to you and most of the answers are already given above.

1. Yes, i did prove everything. 2. Number 2 says that your definition of a spam image tell that your league lost argumentation here. If you deny everything then sooner or later you will be in the corner like with the warmup spam question and loose.

I didn't decide anything by me own. You and all of your league had a chance to respond adequately but you failed to do it. That fact doesn't require me to conclude that you failed in the argumentation. I repeat the earlier example: Your hands are bloody and you are asked what did you do in the victims house yesterday as the security cameras show you in there. You don't answer anything or you answer that "the day is sunny" or "i wasn't in the victims house"- all those answers arenot valid and very likely you will be put into prison. The same is here that your league failed to give valid answers to questions where you can clearly conclude that your league is wrong. There is no need that the whole world would vote if the criminal was guilty. Therefore it does not matter who concludes things from your inadequate respondings. All the conclusions are right and obvious. If you want to say that you won the argumentation here then you must not fail to answer the opponent's questions. But you all failed in that matter and failed to even answer a simple spam question adequately. I represented ca 20 questions and arguments and you failed them all. Did you answered adequately that the brothers example above shows some kind of valid stats and can you say what it shows? No, your league didn't answer to that and to anything else adequately. If i asked that do you think that Subs are OPand can you explain how OP they are then the league was again silent or provided contradicted opinions. If one asks what do you mean that all hate subs then you becaome silent. and so on. That all concludes that the loosing party failed in their argumentation because they couldn't answer things. You are giving an another definition about spam images which contradicts other versions from your league. Go and find out who of you is right. Until then you are inadequate and failed the warmup round. By your definition spam images do something usually but not always. Such a misleading definition sounds like the definition that images give 1000 ways to interpret or the other definition that images prove that someone is wrong. Well if there are no single clear understanding what an image does then your image is inadequate or can be interpreted as your loss. So, you don't seem to be adequate with the images opinion and contradicts with your league opinion. Such thing proves that you are not ready for any argumentation.