Fastmotion

Yes i agree that limiting/nerfing something is reasonable like i mentioned earlier limiting the torps dmg amount. But first, one most prove that hamless subs need nerf. Good to see that people start to go into the topic. See what happens with a dead 1-page hate speach topic after a guru enters- people start to make first arguments in the history.

i didn't noticed because i didn't even read my text which may have some s missing or something. I don't take seriously irrelevant unqualified things so i just repeated a ready made answer that "grammar is irrelevant". So you were wrong again by assuming things.

i have plenty of times proved that offtopical irrelevant grammar details have no point. I agree that you are Unqualified but ifa guru leads you like i leaded the community to start challenge then i suggest that just follow the guru.

i didn't understand your offtopical opinion but i can repeat that my post just proved that you were wrong and proposed to continue with the challenge that i proposed.

You are wrong if you think that i take something seriously from inadequate people. So, as you all see you are all so many times wrong. What do you think is it enough now to be thousand times wrong and we continue our started challenge with screenshots and analyzing the subs related data in there and related things? The challenge does not require to be adequate or reasonable. Just play battles and post here and we make conclusions and stay in the subs topic.

i repeat that i refuse to repeat what i said plenty of times and post any links because you haven't proved your credibility in the qualification exam. Go and answer the argument 1. Why do you need the arguments 2 and 18 if you cannot qualify even with the 1st one like others from your league?

Haters league does mostly hating and hate speach. Allows only 1 opinion that most follow and threaten/silencing others who may dare to say out a different opinion. The example is a country where peope are punished to use a word war and TV must tell only one and only allowed opinion/truth. In this socium the same is with Subs and peopel who like it. They are reported immediately and silenced with inadequate methods. That is the definition of the term and it is obvious who those are in this topic and in this socium. WG, me and sub players are not part of that league.

I have provided 20 arguments related to the subs matter, enlightened people in many related things, activated a dead 1-page topic and never violated any higly accepted adequate rules. For example i never ignore any arguments or questions, i never post irrelevant emoticons or promote spam. And i have seen a progress from the haters league development here. So, i think in overall we all did a progress here. And we also got clear new understanding that this forum is not sutable for argumentation andtherefore it does not contain anywhere any argumentation yet. But we started slowly and managed to start and end with 1-2 arguments.

You seem to say now that somebody is not what your league thought first. That proves that your league were wrong and probably is still wrong. I suggest to get to the level where you are not so often wrong and defeated and stay more in the subs topic and then you have a chance to develop as a human and suffering fades away.

I can't find that post in the forum because it contains so many arguments everywhere. At the first glance on the picture i see a phrase that "reporting is against human rights" and it may mean that if you report someone in the Game then that act removes the right to speak later i nthe chat and maybe additionally removes the right to use the paid product which is the Random battles. So, Human rights has an act that suggest things like humans have right to have air andwater andalso think and talk, even the biggest criminal should speak and it is benefitial to everyone to hear more details/lessons from him. So, reporting violates the idea that humans should speak as much as they awant and drink water as much they wish. Maybe that was the idea there, i believe the outer context may explain it better there. But maybe the text there meant that some countries deny journalists to speak and use some words like War and some countries report such journalists and later the journalists get killed. Maybe it means that. I can provide ca 10 interpretations for that text. But i'm not sure which one was actually meant and i can't find that post.

Not soon. Because you violate obvious rules by posting spam. Go ahead and answer to qualification examm question, no need to wait that enlightening happens in the future itself.

You misinterpreted the text from your image and didn't prove anaything against my statement which said that it is irrelevant which bicycle people have. If you have a yellow bike then that does not prove you opinions more than a blue bike. The same is with stats- those don't give you a victory in the Subs argumentation as we proved and also diplomad don't do it. Also can you prove that it is me who wrote it there? Additionally you are wrong in your prediction/assumption like many times your defeated league members were too earlier.

I understand that your Karma talk is another typical silencing method like reporting all Sub players immediately like the haters league does and later suffers. In my clan the rule is that minus 1 is never allowed because it causes Human Rights violation later and other violations and makes the reporters suffer and reporting is an inadequate abused tool. The +1 is allowed only in 1 rare case but this is an offtopic in this Subs forum so i don't enlighten that

Why not but i don't listen to your inadequate defeated league's offtopical suggestions so i won't rename anything.

Seems like you start to improve and understand my adequate rules. The rule is as i said that spam is not allowed and does not prove any argument. So, if you suggest to delete spam then that means you are getting elightened by my light.

Your argument is not valid. It does not matter which country anybody are from and which bicycle they have. Also it does not matter which grades you got from highschool and which Wows numbers you have. In my rules it is forbidden to copy paste irrelevant spam that you do now and is widely accepted in this forum.

I already proved that the member and pixel count is not a vlaid argument. Also i enlightened here many blind opinions and hopefully your false opinions fade little bit awy too soon.

Every adequate clan has a forum because the game chat is not adequate and voice chats are not either. but if the forum and clan does not ahave adequate rules then the forum becaomes useless like this one here. The reason why i don't promote forum link is that it is against my rules. One is not allowed to drop links, emoticons and other spam.

Here we stopped the argumentation after your league failed to qualify and we declared your league as defeated. But seems like some still ask things related to arguments so i have been explaining that if you still want anything then there is a price and conditions for that. And, you don't have to stress how i explain to people here right now and later there- this should stress you. You are free to discuss there or here aswell but there you will be restricted if you act inadequately.

I already said that the current member here and there is not a valid argument. People asked me to enlighten them and i proposed my rules for that which means that they go there and agree with adequate terms and that is enough for the argumentation to start. There is no matter how many members or pixels the forum have right now.

Your opinions are wrong because of the same prediction aspect that your other league mate did. So, let me answer to your defeated league and not only to you: you don't give opinions based on the future prediction and other assumtions. If you don't know what the opponent does right now and tomorrow and other aspects then you almost always fail by suggesting them to go for eaxample skiing. Firstly maybe they don't have snow, secondly, maybe they are already a skiing instructor i nthe office 24/5, and so on. You almost always fail if you suggest something based from your suggestions. Like your league's comrade fail in such things so you fail here too. Once you qualify in the future i agree to read your opinions.

As i explained the forum is highly suitable for the argumentation. I provided the proof and won't repeat it and firstly because you don't qualify.

it is up to you if you look and answer and be adequate or not. But if you want to do any argumentations in adequate way then you will not repeat defeated arguments. This is an essential rule. Therefore go read links and arguments, answer simple qualification question. Otherwise it is nowhere leading cycle where inadequate people jsut repeat the defeated arguments or make YesNoYes dialogues.

It is not understood how your offtopical unadequate opinion proves anything about awereness showing such images. Even if you manage to explain somehow later then i suggest to first qualify and stay in the subs topic. I can answer yoiur the offtopical opinions but you must qualify first. Because you havent't proved that your opinions have some value then it does not matter what do you think about forums. As explained the forum proposed is highly suitable and adequate. no matter how many symbols or users it contains.

Yes, and there is a proof about it, go and look. There i remember that we explained very clearly that delusion is that the suffering haters league believes that Subs are a problem. In reality there are noi problems. After delusion belief fades you get free from your suffering. all that is explained very clearly like all other arguments and nobody provided anything against those.