Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Historynerd

Beta Tester
  • Content Сount

    4,249
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    848

Everything posted by Historynerd

  1. Historynerd

    A detailed look at Surrey (Design Y)

    Well, can't argue with the logic, if one keeps in mind the implied disadvantage mentioned before. Still, a ship I'd definitely like to sail someday!
  2. Historynerd

    R+L=J theory confirmed and Uncle Benjen found

    Interesting matchup in my head. One side: Yamato Other side: Baratheon/Lannister ships all carrying wildfire.
  3. Historynerd

    A detailed look at Surrey (Design Y)

    Amazing work, and very interesting; I was definitely looking forward to more information about these ships! I'd like to ask, am I interpreting the images wrong, or does the main belt cover only a fraction of her side? About these turrets... They probably had their reasons to put such tin can turrets around these guns, but it still leaves me rather baffled. Sure, the Italians never bothered that much to keep inside the Treaty limits (if ever), but at least I expect both the Trento and the Zara (whenever they'll come) to have rather sturdy turrets.
  4. Historynerd

    Pick for the first French premium ship.

    Yes, the Italian 203 mm guns are definitely going to need some degree of buffing to their RoF. The Zara's Model 1927 not so much, since the ship is quite tanky and so it can do with a relatively long reload time; the Trento's Model 1924 absolutely. Those darned things were bloody nightmares; luckily only two cruisers out of seven got them....
  5. Historynerd

    German BBs+ tier 6 premium French BB Dunkerque stats in 0.5.9

    Am I wrong, or does it look like the Dunkerque's 130 mm guns are of little value in the AA role? EDIT: I was wrong, they work alright. However, in terms of AA power, she's rather weak, I fear...
  6. Historynerd

    Some interesting info around the world

    There were several classes of ships that the Marine Nationale classified as "torpilleurs", such as the Bourrasque, L'Adroit, and Le Hardi, smaller than the larger contre-torpilleurs and therefore more average. To me, it's a mere matter of naming conventions. The Regia Marina too classified its larger destroyers (such as the Leone- and Navigatori-classes) as "esploratori" (i.e. scouts) until 1938, yet they weren't that different in capability from ordinary destroyers, nor in intended roles.
  7. Historynerd

    Pick for the first French premium ship.

    We kind of already know that...
  8. Historynerd

    Some interesting info around the world

    Yet they are know more to naval enthusiasts, who will probably feel differently sailing a La Fantasque- or a Bourrasque-class DD, rather than a Russian one. Pray tell me, what do you mean by "full-fledged DD"? Isn't a DD meant to perform a variety of roles, including defending bigger warships from airborne and underwater threats, and from attacks of enemy DDs?
  9. Historynerd

    Some interesting info around the world

    French DDs tended to be something more than shitty, I believe...
  10. Historynerd

    Some interesting info around the world

    Hmmm... let's not forget that initially the Dunkerques were meant to counter the Panzerschiffe... if I remember right, only the Strasbourg could be somewhat modified to try and make her a match for the Scharnhorst (and to react to the Italians starting to build the Littorios), by giving her thicker belt armour. Is it possible that this difference may mean that, if the Dunkerque is a premium, we'll have the Strasbourg in the regular tree, maybe in a higher tree?
  11. Historynerd

    R+L=J theory confirmed and Uncle Benjen found

    The chance that it might a different turn is always present, of course. But you have to admit it does add up. Besides, to me it sound right. Jon is taking an increasingly important role in the fight against the Others; it's poignant that his ancestry comes from both the North (the only ones who remember them coming) and the House of Dragons (who seem to be connected to what the White Walkers fear). Just my opinion here, though.
  12. Historynerd

    German BB line !

    I'm late for the party. But no surprises here. It looks pretty much how I figured it would be.
  13. Historynerd

    PROPOSAL: Full German Capital Ships Line (BB/BC)

    You have a point, but as the other ships on other trees show the influence of the Washington Treaty, we cannot ignore it. The issue with barbettes is a bit different if we talk about cruisers or about battleships. High caliber guns' turrets were exceedingly heavy (some weighed as much as a destroyer), and the barbettes were not just to protect the ammunition trunks, they were there also to sustain such tremendous weight. You cannot swap them like sneakers, so it's not wheter it's cheaper than building a new ship, it's about wheter the ship can take new guns and turrets. In the case of the Italian battleships, the weight increase was modest, so the structures and the barbettes could take it. What you suggest is something definitely more ambitious,
  14. Historynerd

    Fan made Italian tech tree

    Aesthetics aren't that important, not to mention that only the Kirov so far really comes close to the Italian cruisers in resemblance. In fact, I sail it also because at times I can pretend I am sailing an Italian light cruiser!
  15. Historynerd

    Pick for the first French premium ship.

    I never thought that it could work at Tier 7. Its armament is good but not spectacular (damage- and RoF-wise), its speed and protection are again decent but not enough to give it an edge over the heavy cruisers that it would have to face. But we are drifting OT, I'm afraid.
  16. Historynerd

    Pick for the first French premium ship.

    I never thought that the D'Aosta could be Tier 6 material. I think that even before the Duca degli Abruzzi is adequate for that.
  17. Historynerd

    Let's talk French battleships a bit...

    It's true. I wonder why... Maybe I don't know where to look, but I can't figure out what this gun has that causes such a lackluster performance... Damn... I just realized that, if these figures are correct. the Italian 320 mm would've done a better job than the French gun. If so, I would not have wished for the Bretagne-class BBs to go and slug it out with their Italian counterparts...
  18. Historynerd

    Montana is WEAK

  19. Historynerd

    Let's talk French battleships a bit...

    I see about the penetration, but I was talking about the sheer alpha damage, which is something different. Maybe you have information that I don't, but from what I know the 340 mm doesn't seem such a bad weapon. It was held back by the fact that its initial top elevation was ridicolous (12°), but it doesn't seem that inferior to, say, the British 13.5-inch Mark V gun, which I think might have a good chance for appearing at Tier 5.
  20. Historynerd

    Pick for the first French premium ship.

    Well, I personally feel that one of those DDs wouldn't be bad... but that's my opinion. For all we know, they could put in the Lorraine.
  21. Historynerd

    Let's talk French battleships a bit...

    All true, However, they'll also pay with somewhat lower alpha damage, albeit a bit more than the German 28cm.
  22. Historynerd

    Pick for the first French premium ship.

    The Bretagne is the lead ship of her class, so it's unlikely we'll see her. The Waldeck-Rousseau was an armoured cruiser, which is a no-go with WG. Personally, I am inclined to believe it will be a destroyer.
  23. Historynerd

    R+L=J theory confirmed and Uncle Benjen found

    Don't you mean... IF...
  24. Historynerd

    How about add an Ise-class BB in its late hybrid-CV design?

    Biased poll is biased. Also, how about you search the forums and see if someone has already opened a topic about it, before making a new one?
×