ShinGetsu

Lost a match with Martel yesterday : Had Arsonist, Confederate, Witherer... I don't know why, but for once yesterday my team weren't camping. They happily went to suicide instead. Did a straight 7 loss without a single win, and gave up at this point... Also I think we're just gonna keep having these topics as long as the issue isn't resolved.

Depuis la campagne du Bismarck et les dernières missions comme Mikasa, on est passé de 47% à 51% du total des parties jouées en tier 8 jouées par des BB...

Pas de CE... Et si t'es en build AA à 13 points, t'as même pas IFHE ?

Ils sont automatiquement revendus pour 10.000 crédits unité.

Don't like all BB matches when playing BB ? Stop playing BB. You're just part of the problem.

L'Aoba c'était mon premier tier 6 sur ce jeu, quelques semaines après la CBT... évidemment qu'avec le Cleve que j'ai eu y a deux mois je fais mieux en stats. C'est pas comparable ça. xD C'est comme si tu comparais mes stats en Myoko avec le Shchors ou l'Algérie qui sont mes derniers grind quoi. Mais lorsque les ranked tier 6/7 ont eue lieue, j'ai joué Aoba dans la partie t6 et je l'ai trouvé proprement monstrueux dans ce mode. Les 203 mettent tout en feu facilement, font mal, font beaucoup plus mal aux DD que tu le crois parce qu'elles cumulent alpha, gros calibre (gros dégâts aux modules), bonne balistique, et reload correct. Et comme il est pas si mal blindé et qu'il a des torps, il peut jouer beaucoup plus agressivement qu'un Cleve voire un Budyo.

Les stats serveurs mettent le Cleveland au niveau d'Aoba alors qu'il a le double de "DPM" et que les deux sont ultra violents. xD

Non. Aoba est un excellent navire et je veux qu'on le reconnaisse. Non mais vraiment.

Non mais comparer la Gali avec l'Aoba j'aurais tout lu ici. ._.

L'Aoba a 10 secondes de reload sur 6x203, c'est la meilleure cadence de tir de tous les CA IJN et même de tous les 203 jusqu'au tier 8, d'où exactement ça donne "un DPM minable" ? Surtout que l'armement aux 2/3 à l'avant c'est un avantage, pas un défaut... Et il est maniable, robuste, et avec plein de torpilles qui mordent et vont loin.

It seems Hindenburg will get fixed next patch in this regard. That never happened to mine, curiously, but I did detonate one recently with my Moskva.

Le Shinonome reste pour moi un des meilleurs DD t6. Son armement est long à reload mais ne rigole pas, et ses torpilles bien qu'un peu short en portée sont quand même redoutables.

I remember a battle in Kutuzov, not only did I fail very hard, but a NO used radar and went for me. I wanted to ambush him with torpedoes, but sadly there was a huge gap between the first torp and the 4 other at its right... so he went through without even moving his rudder and sunk me while holding his laughter. :'( RNG wasn't with me that day.

Aoba en garbage tier. LOL NOPE. xD 4x203 (la dernière tourelle est rarement utilisable) qui reload en 10 secondes avec un profil étroit, des chances d'incendies énormes à leur tier, et un navire globalement robuste, agile et rapide ? C'est un des meilleurs du tier 6... Galissonnière par contre, c'est du garbage. Et Shinonome c'est 3x3 torpilles, je sais pas pourquoi vous voulez absolument lui mettre 2x3.

Everything besides Khabarovsk belt armor, German BBs belt and deck, Yamato deck. I think part of german BBs bow is also at 50mm. USN BBs is 37mm (or 38 ? I never remember), so even them are not safe against 180mm with IFHE, while they are against 152/IFHE and 203.

I know my overall stats and approximately how good I am, and any progress on my end would be very slow at this point. It's already slow actually. So checking my stats doesn't really interest me as a whole. I just try to get more win than lose on a daily basis. On the other hand, I often check my results on a specific ship. For example since 4/5 days I'm mostly playing the Khabarovsk I just bought, and I'm checking how well I do perform with her and if I can improve it.

And absolute devotion to the Sub_Octavian.

De base PEGI 7 c'est hyper trop méga giga bas pour ce jeu...

"Balanced". Yeah right. Take another look at her AA consumable.

Well, even if they weren't, it's really not the moment to add any other BB line. Especially the overhyped one which will obviously also be overbuffed.

But she IS similar... I played Budyonny, Shchors, even Kirov the same... And I still play Moskva the same. The only big difference is the radar. Kutuzov is a different beast entirely due to the smoke. Also it's OP af. Donskoi scales very well for her tier. Actually if not for the Saint Louis I'd say that she's hand down the best tier 9 CAs, while the other are between "meh" (Roon, Baltimore) and okay-ish (Ibuki) As for fire chance, you really doesn't care losing 1% with IFHE and DE given the huge boost in DPM you gain in the process. 4 Captain points more on Moskva indeed is a good addition, but that doesn't impact much on the playstyle itself. Look, I have the Moskva, I played the whole tech tree from Kirov to Donskoi (okay, I freepexed Chapayev because I'm sick of playing tier 8), I know what I'm saying...

Like French DD, RN DDs, Italians CAs/CLs, Italian DDs, or USN CLs ? (Or even RN CVs) Because I don't think overhyped, ugly RN BBs are "relevant".

Jean Bart, sister ship of Richelieu. Richelieu will probably be the standard tech tree version.

Donskoi have very accurate guns, with high velocity. The DPM is a little bad, but the reload mod is here to compensate, and you still got 12x180mm (while the other ships are either 10x203 or 9x203), and your range is more than enough. As for the handling, I'm sorry but that's totally not true. Shchors got 900m turn radius and is slower, Budyonny is about 840 or 860, Chapayev is the only "agile" ship of the whole line actually, most handle like battleships. Donskoi have bad gun arcs, and that's why you have to use kiting and firing "from behind". Moskva without IFHE actually has less HE pen than Donskoi with. And if you did the grind starting from Kirov, you should already have a captain specced with both IFHE and CE. Moskva indeed requires a different captain, but is as sluggish as the other of the line, as fast as the other, the only difference is the horrible concealment and the somewhat better armor. Which is very relative, since the only thing you can actually hope to use is your deck armor at longer range. The playstyle is very much the same from tier 6 to 10 in the russian cruiser line. There are some difference of course, like the concealment on Chapayev, but if you waited until tier 9 to figures you can't play them... well... you're slow. Moskva ISN'T a "totally different ship". I thought the same when I bought it, but that's not the case. With Moskva you still can't play agressively at the beginning of the match, because if you do, you'll be spotted very soon, focused and sunk in no time. Donskoi is a very good cruiser, probably the tier 9 I liked the most. 180 with IFHE hurts like hell, and the AP on broadside targets are much more reliable than 152, and even 203/220 at times since they prevent overpens on other squishy cruisers.

Quelques semaines après que Kancolle rajoute le même navire à son jeu sous le nom de Gangut (son nom original). Coïncidence ? Il me semble qu'il y a aussi un HMS racheté par les Russes qui correspond à cette description, mais Gangut est largement plus probable.