WingedHussar_Adler

why do you play game in which you are very bad AND MORE IMPORTANT you do not like mechanic that WILL NOT CHANGE and you know it?

NOT YOU MATE, i said your kind of players

Well cryiers destroyed IJN torpedos, 1-2 years ago only you could read on forum was "NERF SHIMAKAZE!!!!!)!)!)!)!), and now tomatoes have new target......anything that requires a little amount of skill or tamplay is target for yourkind of playrs

lol.....my least played games are in CV :) we have here pure LTP issue.....removing CV (that will not happen) will not help you to move from tomato stats, you know?

31,4% gams in DDS 24,8% games in CA 23,6 in Bs 20,2 in CV so what kind of player i am ? :)

i know....tomatos have biggest problems wit them....CV in penicilin for tomatos

BBs haters?.....ha?....from where do you pull that?...when subjest is totaly irelevant, you need to look at person, and person allwas is tomato....is it coincidence?

so stalth dd do not bother you, but CV does :).....funny funny

problem is....you suck in game....CV destroys tomatos....you wana them out of the game...it is so unsen to this day :)) it is like 100000 topic/posts about "remove cv" form total tomatos....and mate you totaly suck in this game eaven you have 10 k!!! games....

did they stealthtorp BBs from 5,5 km?

unvisable ships on 6 km? - dds? you dont have problem with that?..in reality dd could sneek to BBs to 6 km? :)

why o why allways this brillian ideas fromm totaly potato playrs?

Nop. From where2 do you pull that?

In this game cvs are: 1. If game full of tomato zombies - dmg dealer 2. If there are nonidiots who can teamplay= scauters. In this game as in real one cv is prior target but because of disbalance between them they intreduced defensive AAA (imaginarni thing) to protect them. In reality whole fleet protect cv

Apslolutly not thrue. CV was dominant ship that contered EVEREYTHING. Job of cv was to sunk anithing over and under sea. CV was and is not anty cv ship.

I hope you all know this game has nothing in common with reall naval battles of ww2

True. Because of hords and hords of whiners who crys when get killed going solo on other side of map and majority is like that. So wg make BBs one man army with 13 km detection, 100 AAA rating and radars (rn line). Basicly now everything conters everything except BBs who has no conter as dd and cv are nerfed to protect solo sailing potato morons

Nobody (who is not braindeadmonkey) gets deleted by AP bombs.

Only Saipan

Well you need brain for that and for whining on forum you don't:)

Nah if he is not total moron you will not do more than 5-6 k non fire dmg in 100 shots. And with fire chance nerfed it will eavened or slightly nerfed dmg from secondaries. Also on 10+ km dd will avoid most hits. And to be honest Bismarck/tirpitz needed firechance reduction. It is not god when he can start 3 fires in 30 sec.

Offc or if you wanna torprun it on Zao or Hindy.....but still CA and below 10 km from deathstar is not good position :) Yesterday i deleted t9 cruiser with one salvo from Montena on 14 km. Ok he was full broadside and could do crap when deathstar emerged from cloaking 13.4 km stealth and unleashed 120.000 k potential dmg towards him. So fun and engaging :)

I think that we have solid balance on t10. BBs are (all 3) balanced to eachothers CA are fair game. No bad contender Dds well ijn could use some love but still not catastrophic CV is mess. Haku eats alive Midway which is historicaly corect because ijn destroyed all usa cv which were inferior to ijn.....ih wait:) And now crossclass balance. BBs needs less AAA and worst precision on 15k+ And BIGGEST problem on t10 is hords and hords of braindead monkey zombies with 6 k games and 42% winrate with 18 k average dmg and 800 efficiency

If ca is a spoted and 10 km from BBs it has bigger problems than secundaries :)

They have more HP with module than regular t8 TB and DB from usa/ijn but They are slower so good approach is mandatory2