WingedHussar_Adler

you are fine to comment and even finer to give some stats (when you can not use personal experience for CC play) that back up your opinion.

i am worst possible example...i started playing cvs and dds as first lines....on 3k games i was on 49% wr....aka total brain dead idiot :) better to use myple stats vs RTS stats from warships.

third option...RU beeast that for sure will come for research points :)

see..wee agree....spreadsheets are in line with stats from Maple...you would know if you have single game played in RTS mode or more than couple games in todays mode...but hey..listen to Forum....it is know as been most precise and wine free place to gather solid information's :)

yep my bad.

no need....i use stats..do not surf forum and take words on 1 or 2 players as gods truth

The gap is lesser, Good CV captain now can not stop other Captain.....only his incopetence stops him. While before if yu were 60% WR guny and met 80%WR guy you would be usseles.....right now you do not fight 80%WR guy but flak..... Dominance of CV? Where? Can you point what CV were or are now dominating? Never ever CV dominated anythig it is reduntant lie. the only true thing is that in RTS good captain would shut down bad one and make his play (unfun).....now he can not stop him...he can freely run into flack and die,

and still average player does worst in new Haku than in old Haku? How come?

What is wrong with Aplha? It is higher than BIG E isnt it? Precision is the problem

Because peoples are ignorant and believe everything that they read on forum aka CV = won game becasue unstopable ship entered the game...and if your team lost because you in Terminator ship were worst that their captain in Terminator ship. how may time did i hear "CV do that, do this gimme fighter....from 42%WR guy who ended last on scoreboard.....just ignore. Yesterday in Ranked one guy did not stop posting "LTP CV, use fighters, cover me"...bla bla.....we won...i was fiirst....2700 base exp...he was last......just ignore

At least i pull it on first page :)

Less type type of forum and more pew pew in game and many of you will pass that magic mark of 50% WR :) you can do it. Forum wins do not count. :)

this topic is on page 2....that is unaccaptable. look i capped cap in cv....nerf plox

So competitive T4 scene is still strong :(

so you think they did this because good players would not handle with it: - torepdo herf - nerf od spread and detection - remove of fighters from CV - remove of stealth fire - crating BBs that are designed to spam HE - introducing skills that shows you where is enemie ship which is undetected and so on basically i could not remember single thing that WG did last couple of years that was not "easing/dumbing down" the game....they did not do that because good players demand it for sure. regarding RTS vs NOW players...i know they are not exact same peoples but they are o similar level skill.

sorry man but to WG you are irrelevant.....because you are 1 and them are 10.000 who do you think they like and earn more, from you 1 or them 10.000.....ofc this was rhetorical question, no need to answer :) also we can agree that to some part there is also part of affiliation towards game play....you can not say Farra is incompetent, but his level of play in RTS and now is not comparable. also it is very strech thing to say something is better just because 1 person does better in it while 10.000 of rest does worst. We still talk about same playerbase and same competence or incompetence. we can say, on same lavel of competence most player did better in old Saipan, and it is valid statistical statement. If same poples do better in old version than old version was stronger.

Problem is that most semi competitive clans will not accept your average WOWS player into clan or/and CW.....and CW has very good system of leaving "not so good" clans to potato in between them on first level...no amount of grind will help you in CW if you just can not win. and WG will balance game to accommodate highest percentage of players.....and sadly most in wows do not know basics of gameplay(here i blame WG for dumbing down the game instead forcing peoples to lean a thing)

but we all know there are more factors why BBS can not be limited to 3 per match in randoms (beside balance reasons)...they are most played class of ships, and MM would go beserk with that limit....i imagine it is prime reason for not strong or soft limmit BBs to 3 or less. my point about BBs and 1 is regard to reducing spot to CV in CW only.

r AAA so About why they limited BBs to 1 it is not my opinion but WG statement why they did limited them to 1. Rest is my opinion based on very bad skill of players in randoms...you literally in Random can do full broadside turns couple of times per game and survive...in CW you show broadside for 5-10 seconds you wll get salvo from that 1 bbs and it will hurt.....or that 2 Stalingrads that created crossfire :)

Problem is that in CW BBs captain can and will delete cruisers with pint point precision. If they would not limmit BBs, Cruisers would be obsolete class due to BBs domination. In randoms BBs play is no near clinical as good CW clans would make them in crosfires. Does that means BBs are OP ships.....yes in CW, but not in Randoms. Same could be said for CVs ability to spot. Good clans wouls utilize that power of spot...in randoms nobody care of spoted dd....you snipe with HE that BBs 25 km from you.

noting abut real strength of RTS Saipan...as his forte was not dmg in first place :) also , as i told you before....your vision and ability do not corespondent with general public aka playerbase. 2 months stats of Saipan vs RTS stats of Saipan. RTS SAIPAN - T7 - 50% WR - 60,8 k DMG NEW SAIPAN - T8 - 50% WR - 55,7 k DGM Conclusion.....OLD Saipan was better performing ship even tier lower than NEW Saipan.

Problem is that state of game or skill in Randoms and in CW is so hughe that you basically have 2 different games. Driven by your logic BBS are bad for game becasue in CW they have limit to 1 per side?

Yeh if he is alone. But when there are 2-3 ships by him you are in their strong zones and lose planes. With sling you start out of AAA. Got immunity. Land on his head. Zoom out. Sling is not for precision. Sling is for protection.

It is if you do 20 k with AP after sling. And with little practice it is not that hard on sitting target. Cruisers hiding behind island

Alpha wins over DPM. Torps are DPM Ap = ALPHA Even if in the end they sum to same numbers.