ilhilh

To follow your argument: Bit selfish don't you think? Not everyone has tier 7 and 8 ships... EDIT: I do this to point out that you at first glance seem to be trying to make things fairer but in fact seem to be looking just at yourself. To add to all of this you then also claim that 'all of the action' is in tiers 4-7 and base this on your whopping 64 games at tier 8. Please stop.

What is your favourite class of ship? No point having a good credit earner if you don't enjoying playing her. The Saipan (since you asked) is a decent and can hold its own at tier 7 even without a 5 skill captain. I've actually just rolled my captain onto his 5th skill and not tried it since but I will be able to dominate the skies (with 2/2/0) even easier with it now.

'so people know'? Which people? I wouldn't remember your name if I saw it in battle and I'm not sure I even read the 3 perpetrator's names. I tried to help but you seem to be taking a very childish approach to the situation - posting on a forum is never going to get anyone banned (well except maybe you). It is that simple. But, as I said it is unlikely that you could get anything done even with a support ticket since you don't have any proof. I don't know why you think that they have replays for every game (and a team of people to trawl through them???) because I'm pretty certain they don't - the storage required would be insane. Even if they store information about who has done team damage they are not going to know the circumstances behind it. In all honesty if you are serious about leaving the game if they don't ban these 3 people based on your forum post then you might as well uninstall now but I can't offer you any recommendations of what you might move on to play instead - single player games might the best option because I've yet to play any multiplayer game that doesn't suffer from griefers and trollers.

Yea... so the people who deal with misbehaviour in chat don't sit reading the gameplay section of the forum. If you want to speak to someone then raise a support ticket. You also are not allowed to name people on the forum in a negative way (such as this). It will get removed and you will get sanctioned. Finally, just because you describe it as 'not enough' doesn't change the fact that they are unlikely to get any more punishment than what the automatic system dished out... especially if you have nothing like a screenshot or better yet replay of the events you describe (that you can add to your ticket to support).

Damn, that looks like a nice offer. Having just got the Benson I am not sure I need another tier 8 gunboat... but it does look nice and decent value.

Yesterday me and Damanta were in a tier 8 division (me Lex and him NC) when we came up against a division with Vulgarny (Shokaku), Dropsiq (Kutuzov) and Azell (Hipper). Surprisingly I didn't embarrass myself totally in what is an inferior CV - although I recently got 15th skill point for my Lex captain. But I couldn't do a massive amount to stop Vulgarny (apart from a sneaky strafe against his first cross drop on our DD) and had to focus on doing what I could in parts of the sea where he wasn't. Their team won but me and Damanta were top 2 on our team and I would like to think that we put up a respectable fight

My original main focus was on the 2 BB lines but I also pushed up both (USN and IJN) CA lines and the the IJN CV/DD lines. This reflected my overall preference for BBs and views from CBT i.e. get the BBs but play all classes. Doing both CA lines was only ever going to go as far as the Cleve for USN and then the top for IJN. That already is 6 lines but changes in the meta have led to my plans being adapted. I played IJN CV to tier 7 and then paused. At the time the Hiryu was a beast (although the changes to TBs have affected it) but the top tier USN CVs were excellent. So, once I got to the Hiryu I elited it and started up the USN CV line. Currently at the Lex and still kind of enjoying it. I have now bought the Shokaku as well but I don't want to play too much CV so I think I will hop between lines until I have both at tier 10. On the DD front, IJN DDs always appeared better due to their superior torps but I was never very good with them (too impatient mainly). But, in the days where DDs became much more prevalent, gun boat DDs became a great option... and as the owner of a Gremyashchy I have learned the way of the gunboat... to an ok level. I already had the Fubuki at the point I started the USN DD line and now I have the Benson and the Fubuki is still a work in progress - the USN DD line is just more fun. As for the new nations... I haven't really touched them but this is because I don't want to start new CA lines when I haven't finished current ones. I think both the German and Russian CA lines look good but I need to get through the Mogami/Ibuki before I tackle either of them. The top tier RU DDs look good and with a 15 skill Gremy captain I get a nice start on the line but with 2 tier 8 DDs on the go I need to finish them before I start another. German BBs are about to arrive and that will be a big focus of mine. With a 15 skill captain on my Tirpitz I have another nice start to the line and as I said at the start... I love BBs As for picking ships on a day to day basis I try to do my 'grinds' but I also use my decent collection of premiums to both earn credits and escape from some of the more lacklustre ships (that could also read ships I am crap in). Texas, Tirpitz, Gremyashchy, Blyskawica and Saipan are all just fun to play (I also have Warspite and Atago but play them less). In fact, the large number of premiums I have has actually slowed my grinds down as I get distracted playing them too much but some, like the Blyskawica I try and focus on a lot in order to get to the 15 point captain that will make it a viable ranked option. My current grinds are the Lexington, Mogami, Fubuki, Benson and Pensacola (doesn't really count) but out of those the Benson is the most fun and the Lex I am happy to play until I get the daily bonus. The others I rarely touch outside of a division.

I still don't see his post as being very toxic. But maybe I just don't see everyone as being so delicate. I'm not actually sure you can just 'ask the same' because that implies I am behaving the same as you when in fact you invited comment and I gave it. But seeing as you do ask I will say that I was not trying to stand up for or protect Geralt as the person was incidental to what I was trying to say - I have a long standing dislike of people getting offended on someone's behalf when the person in question feels no offence themselves.

Atlanta can't smoke...

You can also see the topic on the WoT forum (http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/507752-new-wargaming-rules-violation-policy/) and this probably explains it. It is a wargaming policy that covers all 3 games - probably because they couldn't be bothered thinking about each game individually. WoT does have physics which is open to abuse and it is probably aimed at them.

Little late to the party here but Giralt made a bit of a joke and you got all kinds of twisted on the OP's behalf. If you look at the OP's next reply he didn't seem to have taken the replies as a massive 'bashing'. Why do you feel that you need to stand up for someone who seems perfectly happy. As much as there is toxicity and we should all try and keep it down (I know I make too many sarcy replies but I do try and help people who need help) you wading in there after _one_ reply and turning the thread into an argument is not exactly a positive contribution to the community.

I never claimed to have an official link - we all know the level of official information there has been but just because you make a counter rumour and then say they are all equally rubbish doesn't mean they are. But if you want to dismiss the Gamescom as just being a rumour unworthy of paying any attention to then fine, you do that but I am looking forwards to playing German BBs at the time I always thought I would be able to play German BBs.

Link please

I especially love that despite it being common knowledge that they will be released at Gamescon some people still insist on complaining despite the fact that we haven't got to the Gamescon dates yet

It is called a 'weekend'.

Suck it up. They are under no obligation to tell you anything. And I have seen things on the forum suggesting that it was OP in its original configuration and further balancing/testing was required.

Perhaps you could add an option that if you die in the first 5 minutes it doesn't affect your stats? That would be cool right? ...for someone who has loudly proclaimed the worthless nature of stats over the past year you seem to have them weighing on your mind quite a lot.

This. It has been known gamescon was the date for such a long time now and the date of gamescon hasn't changed...

I think saying "secret" and "ninja nerf" is over egging it a bit. I don't feel they should have to explain every indirect consequence of every change they make.

Is it useful having the minimap all the way over there? Considering how little most people do use it and how much they should use it, it needs to be somewhere in people's eye-lines.

Fuso is one of the best ships in the game. I can only assume that people struggling with it are either using it stock or just don't know how to Fuso.

Totally going to have to get this for some trolling.

So excited about having a new BB line

I'm with you.

You won't play with 50 FPS? Lol. Get a grip. EDIT: further advice - upgrade your PC