C4PT41N_0BV10US

Aight mate, whatever floats your boat! Hope to see you soon on a battlefield

Except, the Zao encounter happened at the beginning of the game and resulted in how much damage? 10k? Later you popped on another Zao, which, kudos to you, was sent to bottom very fast (although he was engaged in a fight against a DD). Then it was Atago, NC, and another Atago - which formed majority of your damage. And, if you actually bothered to read my comments in your other section - vids you posted are ok, but you show Des fighting cruisers, and 90% of the time they're lower tier cruisers, in games when you don't have 3 Yamatos and 2 Montanas with a Tirpitz to boot teams.. Des murders them, and I always said exactly that. Also, I said that recently we're experiencing a meta-shift - due to high DD numbers, BB's are dropping. So, MM will fill the hole with CA's, and usually they're Atagos. This helps Des greatly, and high tier CA's in general, cause CA vs CA gameplay is actually pretty balanced. What I dislike about your vids, is that you draw a conclusion here. Since I do a lot of damage to my opponents - this ship must be great! But, I'd love to see how would you fare in Des pre 5.1, when MM was full of BB's, and what would be your evaluation of the ship performance then.

Or, you are posting vids when you faceroll over tier VIII's? [edit] at least for the Des video, don't have Hindi or Zao, so I won't comment on that vids.

.

Confirm.

http://prntscr.com/9x9s0v Here's the results. However, no thing can go smoothly, do it? So, semifinals were won by landlubbers and pancerni flowmasters, so the final match should be landlubbers vs pancerni. Unfortunately, one of the landlubbers had to take care of some important stuff, and wasn't able to play. After consulting Iwon, we decided that because landlubbers actually made it to finals, they deserve second place (game lost by walkover), and the Pancerni Flowmasters won the whole tournament. However, after consulting teams involved, we thought it would be a shame if we skipped finals, so we forced "honorary battle for glory" rule, and Jedi of the seven seas were called for final battle, which ended in 3:2 for Jedis. Therefore, they earned a special "glory" prize from me. Officially though, the tournament was won by Pancerni Flowmasters, with landlubbers second. General feedback is as follows. If we want international tournament, there needs to be more then one org to contact with english-speaking participants. The enlisting process must be more strictly checked. Any changes to teams must be done day before the tournament. Check in must be done an hour before the tournament - if you don't check, you drop from the tournament. Best of one rounds, although fast, are very unsatisfactory, and this must be changed in favour for Best of three. Format itself is pretty funny, and we saw some very cool actions. Streaming persons must be excluded from organisation and participation. Also, I'm not 100% sure yet, but your team Kurbain propably won the "Best nickname" prize. Although we can't still decide between you and the tea and chocolate brigade. But those Albany names, they made us laugh. Albany is somewhat a memeship in polish section (mostly due to my own actions, but still). Overall. The tournament was pretty fun, although kinda chaotic. From our side - we need to smooth the whole drafting the bracket process and rules must be much more clear. Also, some more strict rules for joining must be implemented. A lot of chaos was coming from teams organising at the last moment. Also, as mentioned, we need to look for a possibility to made this a two days or two weekend event if we want all games to be BO3 and with points system implemented. We also were thinking about set ship roosters (you have to pick 2 roosters before the tournament and sent them to us).

Grats and thanks for playing. We have a lot to discuss about (BO1, and enlisting are most important), also, we need at least 2 more person for org section, to keep contact smooth. If you liked this format, give us some feedback, and we will try to make it a cyclic event, with a lot of improvement. The biggest question is: Can we make it a two day event. First day 2 rounds, BO3, second day 2 rounds, first BO3 and Finals BO5, also, with points, so we can fight for second, third and fourth place. Let us know what you think.

Love it!

Usually, anything with a "Albany" in it is a way to go

So, the listing is over! I'll send each captain a PM with the details. Please, be sure to check it, confirm your participation and be sure you have the latest training room mod installed. Also, please check in on the teamspeak adress you will find in the PM at least 15 minutes before the tournament! Only captains are needed. If you have any questions, please, let me know See you tommorow gents!

znaczy, gość średnio nie gra, jego staty mówia same za siebie, ale te filmiki po prostu nie są rewelacyjne, nie są rzetelną oceną możliwości okrętów, ich wad i zalet. Dlatego nie polecam się nimi kierować. Ktoś się podjara Desem, a później będzie go paziować Zao albo North Carolina i będzie zdziwko, bo przecież Flamu to wychodziło na filmiku. I będą płacze o nerfy i buffy bez żadnego pomysłu.

@Spithas We played yesterday against each other divisions few times. We each had a CV in division. Did you find your games boring? Did you find the DD's so dominant? I had plenty of fun in those games. Especially first game which ended in cool brawl in the middle cap between few ships (2 Des Moines, 2 Zaos, Ibuki and North Carolina). Those games were so much better in terms of fun, pace, teamwork etc. Your CV did splendid job, countered our DD's pretty hard, and that won you two games. In third one he placed two very well executed attack on our BB's (me and my teammate), and that costed you a victory, cause our DD's could do their job without usuall CV punishment above their heads. Which brings us to the core of this discussion. What is the real problem here? DD's? MM? Or is it the missing CV piece? What makes a CA life harder - BB's acting like they do, or the fact that without CV they can't be reliably taken out once they deploy in "siege mode"? In the second battle we played I was stomped by Yamato, but it was a fair fight. I made a huge position mistake, and that Yammy took advantage of it and send me to the bottom in three salvoes. But it was MY mistake that costed me my ship. Not a wonky game design, not a lolrandom citadel. I don't know how you look at it, but imho, without CV, this game is pointless above VIII tier. We're just missing the key element to somewhat balance stuff against each other.

Dzisiaj to nie wiem czy będę. Dużo pracy (3 spotkania od 16 mam ) więc nie wiem czy będę, ale jakbyś mógł mi na priva wysłać np? Ja jakiś tam poradnik standardowy sobie ostatnio obejrzałem i tam było krok po kroku mniej więcej pokazane, więc myślę że ogólnie powinno być ok. Generalnie jest tak, że działa wszystko spoko, przez 3 godziny stream leci ładnie, a później nagle puff i zaczyna się chryja.

.

Mam pytanie natury technicznej. Streama nagrywam OBSem, czy ktoś posiada wiedzę dlaczego OBS zaczyna tracić klatki i krztusi się przy przesyłaniu danych? Połączenie jest stabilne, sprzętowo nie powinno być problemów. OBS zaczyna się krztusić i tym samym stream zaczyna strasznie ścinać. Ktoś ogarnięty ma pomysł z czego to wynika i jak można to naprawić?

Added!

It might be. Let's hope so. From what I hear, it's degrading right now again. They didn't adress most issues with CV's. Like I said, when I que solo, i hit a CV game once in 5 games. With a CV in division, on tier X, we usually wait aroun 2 minutes. LAter at nights 5 minutes is common, at which point we drops high tier CV and go for tier V rumble. This need's to be adressed. One game in 5 shouldn't have CV in it, not the other way around.

Cool, we waited 2 minutes yesterday, restarted que to avoid monster MM, rejoined for another 3 minutes. After that we just went on tier V. It was around 20:00 CET. It's on my stream. And it happens everyday. Around 1:00 it's really getting frustrating. So what's your point? Maybe you try to say, that CV playerbase is big, and each your tier X game has a CV in it?

Well, if you join game with CV you might wait 3 to 5 minutes before MM will find second CV. Although, it got better with last patch. Now it's a 5 games without CV and 1 with. So much better. Before the patch it was like 10 or 15 games in a row without CV. However, I try to not que without CV player in division at high tier. With CV mate I can ask for spot, or for some BB mauling.

Um, don't know exactly. You have 18,4 km range with upgrade, 12,6 detection. With all stuff in place, you should have camo around 9,45 km. Roughly add 6 km to it. So it should be around 16 km, so 2,5 km stealth shoot. Thats pretty decent. Range is one thing, but the ability to sneak to some targets is other. So yeah, go as fast as you can to range and full camo, and you should have better results then me in Baltimore. Additional, high arc will let you already learn your way to Des Moines.

O o o, dzisiaj może kamerkę ustawię o, papę pokaże, staniki polecą, majtasy nerdów, fame i wieczna gloria. Tak, to jest dobry pomysł

Range bro, only range. Range is life. I made the mistake and didn't invest in Baltimore. Don't do it (look at my statistics, Baltimore kinda stands out, doesn't it?). So, range upgrade, concealment upgrade, camo captain, situational awarness. Stealth shoot at BB's, sneak as close as you can to CA's and unleash hell.

I explained it in few topics here and there. We can go two ways: 1. Improve CA survivability and improve their DD hunting capability - imho, it's okay-ish, but we're trying to bring back rock-paper-scissors scheme which failed, and couldn't be forced to work. 2. Provide a hardcounter to BB's - in this case CV's - to force them to manouver and take risks. What kills gameplay at higher tiers is how static the games are being played. No flanking, no sudden movement's nobody want's to take the risk - and it's understandable, can't blame them. You can easily dodge 99% of torps if you are moving slow, bow pointed towards enemy, or where you suspect DD's are hiding. Which at tier X is coming naturally, from experience. So, you need to force them to take the risks, but lessen the punishment from DD's. How do you make that? You bring back CV's which makes DD life a lot harder (DD vs CV balance is a whole other huge factor), and you provide instant punishment for being static. That way, the clock is ticking for BB's, CA's can escort (again, escort stuff is third grade issue at best, but now it's irrelevant, and should be made a flavour of the class). You can't play static games, you need to move, cap, push, lock your enemies etc. I played Des solo few times recently - it's pointless. Either I end in 5 DD vs 5 DD games, which I have almost 0 influence on, or I end in a game with 4 Yamatos per side and 4 DD's - which I hide for the most of the time. But it's a very compensated version of what I think

No te 60% to taki mój poziom mniej więcej jak na razie. Myślę że US krążownikami ciężko mi będzie wyciągnąć się wyżej, a inne klasy mi tak nie podchodzą. Musiałbym Marbleheadem grać ciągle albo inną Kumą, a to mi się tak nie uśmiecha A na pewno nie clevelandem. Sprzedaje go dzisiaj w cholerę.

Thats already happening. Due to huge amounts of DD's on tier VIII+ BB playerbase dwindled (as games are made less fun for them - dodging torps for 15 minutes and shooting dd's is not that fun in a BB), which in turn spawned more CA players. But, it still didn't improve gameplay.